Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal performance improvement of kerosene cook-stoves by heat reuse and radiant heat shielding

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improvements in the thermal performances of kerosene cook-stoves, which have been modified by the incorporation of radiant heat shields and a heat reuse pot, were assessed in this study. Eight test configurations, comprising different combinations of shielded/unshielded cook-stoves, conventional pots and a heat reuse pot, were experimentally assessed. The experiments followed a procedure adapted from water boiling test (WBT) protocol, which included cold-start, hot-start and simmering test phases. Using the temperatures, boiling times, and water and fuel masses obtained from the tests, the firepowers, specific fuel consumptions and thermal efficiencies of the cook-stoves were determined for the eight configurations. When processes in the conventional pot alone were considered, the greatest improvement in the efficiency \(\eta _{\mathrm{conv}}\) was obtained when radiation shields were applied to both inner and outer casings of the cook-stove (Setup V) and was up to 1.7 times the efficiency of the unmodified cook-stove setup. When processes in both conventional and heat reuse pots were considered, however, the greatest improvement in the efficiency \(\eta _{\mathrm{conv+HRP}}\) was up to 3.6 times the efficiency of the unmodified setup, and was obtained when radiation shields were applied to both inner and outer casings of the cook-stove in addition to incorporating the heat reuse pot (Setup VI). These results are indicative of the immense quantities of heat lost by radiation from kerosene cook-stove walls and by the steam vented from convention cooking pots. It has also been shown that significant improvements in kerosene cook-stove performances could be achieved by the simple measures proposed and at low cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayub I, Munir A, Amjad W, Ghafoor A, Nasir MS. Energy-and exergy-based thermal analyses of a solar bakery unit. J Thermal Anal Calorim. 2018;133(2):1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wako FM, Reshad AS, Goud VV. Thermal degradation kinetics study and thermal cracking of waste cooking oil for biofuel production. J Thermal Anal Calorim. 2018;131(3):2157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IEA. Energy poverty: how to make modern energy access universal. World Energy Outlook, International Energy Agency, Paris (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jetter JJ, Kariher P. Solid-fuel household cook stoves: characterization of performance and emissions. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33:294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacCarty N, Ogle D, Still D, Bond T, Roden C. A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2008;XII(2):56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryden M, Still D, Scott P, Hoffa G, Ogle D, Bailis R, Goyer K. Design principles for wood burning cook stoves. Shell Foundation, The Partnership for Clean Indoor AirEugene, OR: Aprovecho Research Center; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anenberg SC, Balakrishnan K, Jetter J, Masera O, Mehta S, Moss J, Ramanathan V. Cleaner cooking solutions to achieve health, climate, and economic cobenefits. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:3944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar M, Kumar S, Tyagi SK. Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khandelwal M, Hill ME Jr, Greenough P, Anthony J, Quill M, Linderman M, Udaykumar H. Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Dev. 2017;92:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith KR, Dutta K, Chengappa C, Gusain PPS, Masera O, Berrueta V. Monitoring and evaluation of improved biomass cookstove programs for indoor air quality and stove performance: conclusions from the Household Energy and Health Project. Energy Sustain Dev. 2007;XI(2):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailis R, Berrueta V, Chengappa C, Dutta K, Edwards R, Masera O, Still D, Smith KR. Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the Household Energy and Health Project. Energy Sustain Dev. 2007;XI(2):57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berrueta VM, Edwards RD, Masera OR. Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. Renew Energy. 2008;33:859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malla S, Timilsina GR. Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries: a review. Policy research working paper 6903, The World Bank, Development Research Group Environment and Energy Team (2014).

  14. IEA. Africa energy outlook: a focus on energy prospects in sub-Saharan Africa. World energy outlook special report, Paris; International Energy Agency, 2014.

  15. Lam NL, Smith KR, Gauthier A, Bates MN. Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low and middle-income countries. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2012;15(6):396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. IEA. Energy access outlook 2017: from poverty to prosperity. World energy outlook special report. Paris: International Energy Agency 2017.

  17. Koshala R, Koshal M, Boyd RG, Rachmany H. Demand for kerosene in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. J Asian Econ. 1999;10:329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao N. Kerosene subsidies in India: when energy policy fails as social policy. Energy Sustain Dev. 2012;16:35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma M, Mahanta P, Mishra SC. Usability of porous burner in kerosene pressure stove: an experimental investigation aided by energy and exergy analyses. Energy. 2016;103:251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. MacCarty N, Still D, Ogle D. Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance. Energy Sustain Dev. 2010;14:161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tyagi S, Pandey A, Sahu S, Bajala V, Rajput J. Experimental study and performance evaluation of various cook stove models based on energy and exergy analysis. J Thermal Anal Calorim. 2013;111(3):1791.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bailis R, Ogle D, MacCarty N, Still D. The Water Boiling Test (WBT). Household Energy and Health Programme, Shell Foundation. Available from The Partnership For Clean Indoor Air at: http://www.pciaonline.org/files/WBT_Version_3.0_0.pdf (2007).

  23. Arora P, Jain S. A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: challenges and way forward. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;55:203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard O. Njoku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Njoku, H.O., Agbo, I.N., Agwuna, I.P. et al. Thermal performance improvement of kerosene cook-stoves by heat reuse and radiant heat shielding. J Therm Anal Calorim 136, 1847–1860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7792-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7792-8

Keywords

Navigation