Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 136, Issue 4, pp 1631–1643 | Cite as

Insights on structural characteristic of Xilinguole lignite chars from low-temperature pyrolysis

  • Qing WangEmail author
  • Ying Liu
  • Fang Xu
  • Qi Liu
  • Da Cui
Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

The cleavage behavior of covalent bonds in Xilinguole (XLGL) lignite and changes in chemical structure of lignite and its chars during low-temperature pyrolysis were investigated by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Based on the TG and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) analysis results, the cleavage of different types of chemical bonds in lignite occurred mainly at four certain temperatures, 170 °C, 376 °C, 432 °C, and 521 °C. The latter three were selected as the final pyrolysis temperatures of chars evaluated in this study. The FTIR analysis results indicate that thermal treatment increased the relative content of two and three adjacent H deformation structures but decreased that of four adjacent H deformation structure. This was caused by the cleavage of Cal–Cal and Car–Cal bonds. The oxygen-containing functional groups in lignite are dominated by C–O and C–OH groups with a lower chemical reactivity than C=O–C and conjugated C=O groups. Moreover, XLGL lignite has the highest ratio of CH2/CH3 which declines with increasing temperature, indicating the decrease in the length of aliphatic chains and increase in the degree of branching of aliphatic side chains. This change mainly resulted from the cleavage of Cal–O, Cal–Cal, and Car–Cal bonds. Furthermore, XLGL lignite and its chars contain five specific hydrogen bonds: OH–N, cyclic OH, OH–ether O, OH–OH, and OH–π hydrogen bonds. The relative content of OH–OH hydrogen bond was the highest, indicating that OH–OH hydrogen bond has the highest thermal stability.

Keywords

Lignite FTIR spectroscopy Covalent bonds Structure changes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded through the support coming from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51676032 and 5176034) and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT-17R19).

References

  1. 1.
    Xu F, Pan S, Liu C, Zhao D, Liu H, Wang Q, et al. Construction and evaluation of chemical structure model of Huolinhe lignite using molecular modeling. RSC Adv. 2017;7(66):41512–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07387a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li F, Fan LS. Clean coal conversion processes - progress and challenges. Energy Environ Sci. 2008;1(2):248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karthikeyan M, Zhonghua W, Mujumdar AS. Low-rank coal drying technologies-current status and new developments. Dry Technol. 2009;27(3):403–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmed II, Gupta AK. Experiments and stochastic simulations of lignite coal during pyrolysis and gasification. Appl Energy. 2013;102(2):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han Y, Yin F, Li X, et al. A review on water in low rank coals: The existence, interaction with; coal structure and effects on coal utilization. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;106(2):9–20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu P, Zhang D, Wang L, Yang Z, Pan T, Lu X. The structure and pyrolysis product distribution of lignite from different sedimentary environment. Appl Energy. 2016;163:254–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu M, Qin Y, Yan H, Han X, Chong D. Energy and water conservation at lignite-fired power plants using drying and water recovery technologies. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;105:118–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen J, Lin M, Cai J, Yin H, Song X, Li A. Thermal characteristics and kinetics of refining and chemicals wastewater, lignite and their blends during combustion. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;100:201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guan Y, Ma Y, Zhang K, Chen H, Xu G, Liu W, et al. Co-pyrolysis behaviors of energy grass and lignite. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;93:132–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu D, Zhou Z, Dai Z, Yu G. Effects of coal drying on the pyrolysis and in situ gasification characteristics of lignite coals. Appl Energy. 2015;155:660–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhang G, Chen L. Gas evolution characteristics of lignite during low-temperature pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2013;104:625–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Guo Y. Low temperature pyrolysates distribution and kinetics of Zhaotong lignite. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;114:11–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang D, Liu P, Lu X, Wang L, Pan T. Upgrading of low rank coal by hydrothermal treatment: coal tar yield during pyrolysis. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;141:117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gong X, Wang Z, Deng S, Li S, Song W, Lin W. Impact of the temperature, pressure, and particle size on tar composition from pyrolysis of three ranks of Chinese coals. Energy Fuels. 2014;28(8):4942–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kabir KB, Hein K, Bhattacharya S. Process modelling of dimethyl ether production from Victorian brown coal-Integrating coal drying, gasification and synthesis processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2013;48(48):96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhattacharya S, Kabir KB, Hein K. Dimethyl ether synthesis from Victorian brown coal through gasification—current status, and research and development needs. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2013;39(6):577–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng X, Wang Y, Yu J, Wu S, Han J, Xu S, et al. Gas upgrading in a downdraft fixed-bed reactor downstream of a fluidized-bed coal pyrolyzer. Energy Fuels. 2011;25(11):5242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun M, Chen J, Dai XM, Zhao XL, Liu K, Ma XX. Controlled separation of low temperature coal tar based on solvent extraction-column chromatography. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;136:41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(3):848–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li Y, Wang ZH, Huang ZY, Liu JZ, Zhou JH, Cen KF. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on lignite char properties and slurrying ability. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;134:52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang K, Deng J, Zhang YN, Wang CP. Kinetics and mechanisms of coal oxidation mass gain phenomenon by TG–FTIR and in situ IR analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132(1):591–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6916-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naktiyok J, Bayrakçeken H, Özer AK, Gülaboğlu MŞ. Investigation of combustion kinetics of Umutbaca-lignite by thermal analysis technique. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;129(1):531–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6149-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu H, Gong S, Jia C, Wang Q. TG-FTIR analysis of co-combustion characteristics of oil shale semi-coke and corn straw. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;127(3):2531–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5739-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi L, Liu Q, Guo X, Wu W, Liu Z. Pyrolysis behavior and bonding information of coal—a TGA study. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;108:125–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.06.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng J, Zhang Y, Wang T, Norris P, Chen WY, Pan WP. Thermogravimetric–Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry study of volatile organic compounds from coal pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(7):7042–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    He Q, Wan K, Hoadley A, Yeasmin H, Miao Z. TG–GC–MS study of volatile products from Shengli lignite pyrolysis. Fuel. 2015;156:121–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meng F, Yu J, Tahmasebi A, Han Y, Zhao H, Lucas J. Characteristics of chars from low-temperature pyrolysis of lignite. Energy Fuels. 2013;28(1):275–84.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401423s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang JP, Li GY, Guo R, Li AQ, Liang YH. Theoretical and experimental insight into coal structure: establishing a chemical model for Yuzhou lignite. Energy Fuels. 2016;31(1):124–32.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang YG, Wei XY, Wang SK, Li ZK, Li P, Liu FJ, et al. Structural evaluation of Xiaolongtan lignite by direct characterization and pyrolytic analysis. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;144:248–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.12.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibarra J, Moliner R, Bonet AJ. FT-I.R. investigation on char formation during the early stages of coal pyrolysis. Fuel. 1994;73(6):918–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Han F, Zhang YG, Meng AH, Li QH. FTIR analysis of Yunnan Lignite. J China Coal Soc. 2014;39(11):2293–9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu S, Zhu YM, Wu LI. Structure evolution of oxygen functional groups in Dongsheng long flame coal by 13C-NMR and FT-IR. J Fuel Chem Technol. 2015;43(5):519–29.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang Q, Cui D, Wang P, Bai J, Wang Z, Liu B. A comparison of the structures of > 300°C fractions in six Chinese shale oils obtained from different locations using 1H NMR, 13C NMR and FT-IR analyses. Fuel. 2018;211:341–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang Q, Ye JB, Yang HY, Liu Q. Chemical composition and structural characteristics of oil shales and their kerogens using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Energy Fuels. 2016;30(8):6271–80.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meng F, Tahmasebi A, Yu J, Zhao H, Han Y, Lucas J, et al. Low-temperature oxidation characteristics of lignite chars from low-temperature pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 2014;28(9):5612–22.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef501004t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dun W, Guijian L, Ruoyu S, Xiang F. Investigation of structural characteristics of thermally metamorphosed coal by FTIR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Energy Fuels. 2013;27(10):5823–30.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401276h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    He X, Liu X, Nie B, Song D. FTIR and Raman spectroscopy characterization of functional groups in various rank coals. Fuel. 2017;206:555–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xiong G, Li Y, Jin L, Hu H. In situ FT-IR spectroscopic studies on thermal decomposition of the weak covalent bonds of brown coal. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2015;115:262–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Georgakopoulos A, Iordanidis A, Kapina V. Study of low rank Greek coals using FTIR spectroscopy. Energy Sources. 2003;25(10):995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Geng W, Nakajima T, Takanashi H, Ohki A. Analysis of carboxyl group in coal and coal aromaticity by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry. Fuel. 2009;88(1):139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hämäläinen JP, Aho MJ. Conversion of fuel nitrogen through HCN and NH3 to nitrogen oxides at elevated pressure. Fuel. 1996;75(12):1377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomas KM. The release of nitrogen oxides during char combustion. Fuel. 1997;76(6):457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Research Centre of Oil Shale Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of EducationNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilin CityPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Energy Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations