Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation of a water/nanofluid jacket performance in stack heat recovery

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of nanofluids (Al2O3–water) on the overall thermal performance of an annular enclosure (or jacket) are experimentally investigated which is used for recovering waste heat from a typical stack of a gas heater. In the initial stages of the heating process, the inner cylindrical wall becomes hotter, while the bulk fluid is nearly at the preceding uniform temperature; hence, the wall heat flux is strongly enhanced at the beginning. Afterward a decline in the wall heat flux is observed due to increasing Rayleigh number and correspondingly generating cellular flows in the annulus that leads to temperature enhancement of the liquid. Using nanofluids has the advantage of improving key parameters such as Nusselt number. Nanofluids with higher nanoparticle concentrations need less response time to react to any changes in thermal environment, and consequently they have smaller time constant. Higher convective heat transfer coefficient as well as greater temperature uniformity in the enclosure is achieved by selecting nanofluids with larger values of nanoparticle concentration. The results also reveal that convective heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number of nanofluids are comparatively enhanced with time, since hotter base fluid results in higher effective thermal conductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

\( A \) :

Area (m2)

\( c_{\text{p}} \) :

Specific heat (J kg−1 K−1)

\( D \) :

Diameter (m)

\( h \) :

Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

\( \mathop h\limits^{\_} \) :

Average heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

\( k \) :

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

\( M \) :

Mass (kg)

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg s−1)

\( Nu \) :

Nusselt number

\( \mathop {Nu}\limits^{\_} \) :

Average Nusselt number

\( Q \) :

Heat (J)

\( q \) :

Heat transfer rate (W)

\( q^{\prime \prime } \) :

Heat flux (W m−2)

\( \bar{q}^{\prime \prime } \) :

Average heat flux (W m−2)

\( Ra \) :

Rayleigh number

\( T \) :

Temperature (°C)

\( \mathop T\limits^{\_} \) :

Average temperature (°C)

\( V \) :

Volume (m3)

X :

Temperature ratio

Y :

Mass ratio

\( \bar{v} \) :

Average velocity (m s−1)

\( \zeta \) :

Heat loss percentage

\( \delta \) :

Boundary layer thickness (m)

\( \Delta \) :

Conduction layer thickness (m)

\( \phi \) :

Nanoparticles volume fraction

\( \rho \) :

Density (kg m−3)

\( \tau_{\text{t}} \) :

Time constant (s)

bf:

Base fluid

e:

Equivalent

eff:

Effective

g:

Gas

i:

Inlet

l:

Liquid

m:

Mean or average

nf:

Nanofluid

np:

Nanoparticle

o:

Outlet

S:

Surface

t:

Time (min)

vol:

Volume concentration

References

  1. Choi S, Siginer DA, Wang HP. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles in development and applications of non-newtonian flows. New York: ASME; 1995. p. 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar H. A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:4051–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang Y, Lee JK, Lee JKU, Jeong Y, Cheong SI, Ahn YC, Kim SH. Production and dispersion stability of nanoparticles in nanofluids. Powder Technol. 2007;186:145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bejan A, Karaus AD. Heat transfer handbook. Hoboken: Wiely; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choi SUS. Nanofluid technology: current status and future research. Vienna, VA, US: Korea-US. Technical Conference on Strategic Technologies; 1998.

  6. Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N. Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles. Netsu Bussei. 1993;7:227–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sridhara V, Satapathy LN. Al2O3-based nanofluids: a review. Nnoscale Res Lett. 2011;6(456):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grimm A. Powdered aluminum-containing heat transfer fluids. German Patent DE 4131516A1; 1993.

  9. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:675–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rashidi S, Mahian O, Languri EM. Applications of nanofluids in condensing and evaporating systems. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:2027–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hung YH, Chen YH, Teng TP. Feasibility assessment of thermal management system for green power sources using nanofluid. J Nanomaterials. 2013; Article ID 321261: 11.

  12. Amani M, Amani P, Kasaeian A, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity measurement of spinel-type ferrite MnFe2O4 nanofluids in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. J Mol Liq. 2017;230:121–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Togun H, Abdulrazzaq T, Kazi SN, Badarudin A, Kadhum AAH, Sadeghinezhad E. A review of studies on forced, natural and mixed heat transfer to fluid and nanofluid flow in an annular passage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;39:835–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravnik J, Škerget L. A numerical study of nanofluid natural convection in a cubic enclosure with a circular and an ellipsoidal cylinder. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;89:596–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amani M, Amani P, Kasaeian A, Mahian O, Pop I, Wongwises S. Modeling and optimization of thermal conductivity and viscosity of MnFe2O4 nanofluid under magnetic field using an ANN. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arani AAA, Kakoli E, Hajialigol N. Double-diffusive natural convection of Al2O3–water nanofluid in an enclosure with partially active side walls using variable properties. J Mech Sci Technol. 2014;28:4681–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abu-Nada E, Masoud Z, Oztop HF, Campo A. Effect of nanofluid variable properties on natural convection in enclosure. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;49:479–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Amani M, Amani P, Mahian O, Estelle P. Multi-objective optimization of thermophysical properties of eco-friendly organic nanofluids. J Clean Prod. 2017;166:350–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Efficiency of ferromagnetic nanoparticles suspended in ethylene glycol for applications in energy devices: effects of particle size, temperature, and concentration. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2014;58:138–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parizad RL, Rashidi S, Esfahani JA. Experimental investigation of nanofluid free convection over the vertical and horizontal flat plates with uniform heat flux by PIV. Adv Powder Technol. 2016;27:312–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amani M, Ameri M, Kasaeian A. Hydrothermal assessment of ferrofluids in a metal foam tube under lowfrequency magnetic field. Int J Therm Sci. 2018;127:242–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rashidi S, Eskandarian M, Mahian O, Poncet S. Combination of nanofluid and inserts for heat transfer enhancement: gaps and challenges. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7070-9 (Accepted).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moghadam AJ, Farzane-Gord M, Sajadi M, Hoseyn-zadeh M. Effects of CuO/water nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;58:9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghadiri M, Sardarabadi M, Pasandideh-fard M, Moghadam AJ. Experimental investigation of a PVT system performance using nano ferrofluids. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;103:468–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moshizi SA, Malvandi A. Different modes of nanoparticle migration at mixed convection of Al2O3–water nanofluid inside a vertical microannulus in the presence of heat generation/absorption. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;126:1947–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Javadi P, Rashidi S, Esfahani JA. Flow and heat management around obstacle by nanofluid and incidence angle. J Thermophys Heat Transf. 2017;31:983–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Raei B, Shahraki F, Jamialahmadi M, Peyghambarzadeh SM. Experimental study on the heat transfer and flow properties of c-Al2O3/water nanofluid in a double-tube heat exchanger. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;127:2561–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shirejini SZ, Rashidi S, Esfahani JA. Recovery of drop in heat transfer rate for a rotating system by nanofluids. J Mol Liq. 2016;220:961–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shahriari A, Javaran EJ, Rahnama M. Effect of nanoparticles Brownian motion and uniform sinusoidal roughness elements on natural convection in an enclosure. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:2865–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Terhan M, Comakli K. Design and economic analysis of a flue gas condenser to recover latent heat from exhaust flue gas. Appl Thermal Eng. 2016;100:1007–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shelke SA, Gohel NS. Heat transfer performance of a vertical thermosyphons heat pipe heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluid for automobile engine exhaust heat. Int J Curr Eng Technol. 2016;5:91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pak BC, Cho YI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf Int. 1998;11:151–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Xuan Y, Roetzel W. Conception for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2000;43:3701–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maxwell JC. A treatise on electricity and magnetism, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon; 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moffat R. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 1988;1:3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rohsenow WM, Hartnett JP, Cho YI. Handbook of heat transfer. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bergman TL, Lavine AS, Incropera FP, Dewitt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. New York: Wiley; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46:3639–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang KS, Lee JH, Jang SP. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids in a rectangular cavity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50:4003–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ho CJ, Chen MW, Li ZW. Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51:4506–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ho CJ, Liu WK, Chang YS, Lin CC. Natural convection heat transfer of alumina–water nanofluid in vertical square enclosures: an experimental study. Int J Thermal Sci. 2010;49:1345–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, P.O. Box 316, Shahrood, Iran

    Houman Moradi Dalvand & Ali Jabari Moghadam

Authors
  1. Houman Moradi Dalvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Jabari Moghadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Jabari Moghadam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalvand, H.M., Moghadam, A.J. Experimental investigation of a water/nanofluid jacket performance in stack heat recovery. J Therm Anal Calorim 135, 657–669 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7220-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7220-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation