Magnetohydrodynamics mixed convection in a power law nanofluid-filled triangular cavity with an opening using Tiwari and Das’ nanofluid model

Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Numerical simulation of mixed convection heat transfer in a lid-driven triangular cavity filled with power law nanofluid and with an opening was performed under the effect of an inclined magnetic field. The left vertical wall of the cavity moves in + y-direction, and the bottom wall of the cavity is partially heated. Galerkin weighted residual finite element method was used to solve the governing equations. Influence of Richardson number, Hartmann number, inclination angle, opening ratio and nanoparticle volume fraction on the fluid flow and heat transfer is examined for various power law indices. It was observed that average heat transfer deteriorates as the value of Richardson number and Hartmann number enhances. At the lowest value of Richardson number, the discrepancy between the average heat transfer corresponding to different power law indices is higher. The inclination angle of the magnetic field where the minimum of the average Nusselt number is seen depends on the fluid type. Average heat transfer number is the highest for the highest value of the opening ratio. The average Nusselt number enhances with solid particle volume fraction, and there are slight variations in the reduction in the average Nusselt number when base fluid and nanofluid are considered for various power law indices.

Keywords

Mixed convection Nanofluid Magnetic field Power law fluid Opening Finite element method 

List of symbols

\(\mathbf {B}_0\)

Magnetic field strength

Gr

Grashof number

h

Local heat transfer coefficient (\(\hbox {W m}^{-2}\; \hbox {K}^{-1}\))

Ha

Hartmann number

k

Thermal conductivity (W \(\hbox {m}^{-1}\; \hbox {K}^{-1}\))

H

Length of the enclosure (m)

h

Length of the heater (m)

m

Consistency coefficient

n

Power law index

\({Nu}_\mathrm{x}\)

Local Nusselt number

\({Nu}_\mathrm{m}\)

Average Nusselt number

p

Pressure (Pa)

Pr

Prandtl number

Re

Reynolds number

Ri

Richardson number

T

Temperature (K)

u, v

xy velocity components (m \(\hbox {s}^{-1}\))

x, y

Cartesian coordinates (m)

Greek letters

\(\alpha\)

Thermal diffusivity (\(\hbox {m}^2\hbox { s}^{-1}\))

\(\beta\)

Expansion coefficient (\(\hbox {K}^{-1}\))

\(\gamma\)

Inclination angle (°)

\(\nu\)

Kinematic viscosity (\(\hbox {m}^2\hbox { s}^{-1}\))

\(\theta\)

Non-dimensional temperature

\(\rho\)

Density of the fluid (\(\hbox {kg m}^{-3}\))

\(\sigma\)

Electrical conductivity (\(\hbox {S m}^{-1}\))

Subscripts

c

Cold

h

Hot

m

Average

References

  1. 1.
    Varol Y, Koca A, Oztop H. Natural convection in a triangle enclosure with flush mounted heater on the wall. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33:951–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yucel N, Turkoglu H. Natural convection in rectangular enclosures with partial heating and cooling. Heat Mass Transf. 1994;29:471–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oztop FH, Estelle P, Yan WM, Al-Salem Khaled, Orfi J, Mahian O. A brief review of natural convection in enclosures under localized heating with and without nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2015;60:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oztop HF, Abu-Nada E. Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:1326–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yucel A. Convection and radiation in a square enclosure. Numer Heat Transfer Part A. 1989;15:261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF, Chamkha AJ. MHD mixed convection and entropy generation of nanofluid filled lid driven cavity under the influence of inclined magnetic fields imposed to its upper and lower diagonal triangular domains. J Magn Magn Mater. 2016;406:266–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Effect of a rotating cylinder in forced convection of ferrofluid over a backward facing step. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;71:142–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banerjee S, Mukhopadhyay A, Sen S, Ganguly R. Thermomagnetic convection in square and shallow enclosures for electronics cooling. Numer Heat Transfer Part A Appl. 2009;55:931–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polat O, Bilgen E. Conjugate heat transfer in inclined open shallow cavities. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46:1563–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostrach S. Natural convection heat transfer in cavities and cells. In: Proceedings 7th international heat transfer conference, Toronto, Canada; 1978Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu P, Qiu J, Qin Q, Tian ZF. Numerical investigation of natural convection in a rectangular cavity under different directions of uniform magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;67:1131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prakash C, Kaminski D. Conjugate natural convection in square enclosure: effect of conduction in one of the vertical walls. HTD ASME. 1984;39:49–54.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF, Al-Salem K. Natural convection of ferrofluids in partially heated square enclosures. J Magn Magn Mater. 2014;372:122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rahman M, Alim M, Sarker M. Numerical study on the conjugate effect of joule heating and magnato-hydrodynamics mixed convection in an obstructed lid-driven square cavity. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37(37):524–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oztop HF, Al-Salem K, Pop I. MHD mixed convection in a lid-driven cavity with corner heater. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:494–3504.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finlayson B. Convective instability of ferromagnetic fluids. J Fluid Mech. 1970;40:753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tiwari RK, Das MK. Heat transfer augmentation in a two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50:2002–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Armaghani T, Chamkha AJ, Maghrebi M, Nazari M. Numerical analysis of a nanofluid forced convection in a porous channel: a new heat flux model in LTNE condition. J Porous Med. 2014;17:637–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ismael MA, Armaghani T, Chamkha AJ. Conjugate heat transfer and entropy generation in a cavity filled with a nanofluid-saturated porous media and heated by a triangular solid. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;59:138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kakac S, Pramuanjaroenkij A. Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:3187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meibodi SS, Kianifar A, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Second law analysis of a nanofluid-based solar collector using experimental data. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;126:617–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rashidi S, Mahian O, Languri EM. Applications of nanofluids in condensing and evaporating systems. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017; 1–13 (in press)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kalogirou SA, Pop I, Wongwises S. A review of the applications of nanofluids in solar energy. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;57:582–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abu-Nada E, Chamkha AJ. Mixed convection flow in a lid-driven inclined square enclosure filled with a nanofluid. Eur J Mechs B Fluids. 2010;29:472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Armaghani T, Kasaeipoor A, Alavi N, Rashidi M. Numerical investigation of water-alumina nanofluid natural convection heat transfer and entropy generation in a baffled l-shaped cavity. J Mol Liq. 2016;223:243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chamkha AJ, Abu-Nada E. Mixed convection flow in single- and double-lid driven square cavities filled with water–Al2O3 nanofluid: Effect of viscosity models. Eur J Mech B Fluids. 2012;36:82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Identification of forced convection in pulsating flow at a backward facing step with a stationary cylinder subjected to nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2013;45:111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Mixed convection of nanofluids in a three dimensional cavity with two adiabatic inner rotating cylinders. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;117:331–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abu-Nada E. Application of nanofluids for heat transfer enhancement of separated flows encountered in a backward facing step. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shenoy A, Sheremet M, Pop I. Convective flow and heat transfer from wavy surfaces: viscous fluids. Porous media and nanofluids. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Das SK, Choi SUS, Yu W, Pradeep Y. Nanofluids: science and technology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grosan T, Sheremet MA, Pop I. In: Heat transfer enhancement in cavities filled with nanofluids. 2017; 267–284Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bahiraei M. A numerical study of heat transfer characteristics of Cuo–water nanofluid by euler–lagrange approach. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:1591–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Modeling and optimization of MHD mixed convection in a lid-driven trapezoidal cavity filled with alumina–water nanofluid: effects of electrical conductivity models. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;136:264–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheikholeslami M, Bandpy MG, Ganji D. Numerical investigation of MHD effects on Al2o3–water nanofluid flow and heat transfer in a semi-annulus enclosure using LBM. Energy. 2013;60:501–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Numerical study of MHD mixed convection in a nanofluid filled lid driven square enclosure with a rotating cylinder. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;78:741–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sheikholeslami M, Bandpy MG, Ellahi R, Zeeshan A. Simulation of MHD Cuo–water nanofluid flow and convective heat transfer considering lorentz forces. J Magn Magn Mater. 2014;369:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Conjugate natural convection in a nanofluid filled partitioned horizontal annulus formed by two isothermal cylinder surfaces under magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;108:156–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hatami M, Sheikholeslami M, Hosseini M, Ganji DD. Analytical investigation of MHD nanofluid flow in non-parallel walls. J Mol Liq. 2014;194:251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chamkha AJ, Rashad AM, Mansour MA, Armaghani T, Ghalambaz M. Effects of heat sink and source and entropy generation on MHD mixed convection of a cu-water nanofluid in a lid-driven square porous enclosure with partial slip. Phys Fluids. 2017;29:052001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chamkha AJ, Rashad AM, Armaghani T, Mansour MA. Effects of partial slip on entropy generation and MHD combined convection in a lid-driven porous enclosure saturated with a cu-water nanofluid. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2017 (in press)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. MHD mixed convection of nanofluid filled partially heated triangular enclosure with a rotating adiabatic cylinder. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45:2150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mahmoudi A, Mejri I, Abbassi MA, Omri A. Lattice boltzmann simulation of MHD natural convection in a nanofluid-filled cavity with linear temperature distribution. Powder Technol. 2014;256:257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheikholeslami M, Abelman S. Two-phase simulation of nanofluid flow and heat transfer in an annulus in the presence of an axial magnetic field. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol. 2015;14:561–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rashad A, Armaghani T, Chamkha A, Mansour M. Entropy generation and MHD natural convection of a nanofluid in an inclined square porous cavity: effects of a heat sink and source size and location. Chin J Phys. 2018;56:193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Selimefendigil F, Oztop HF. Influence of inclination angle of magnetic field on mixed convection of nanofluid flow over a backward facing step and entropy generation. Adv Powder Technol. 2015;26:1663–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rashidi M, Ganji D. Effect of non-uniform magnetic field on forced convection heat transfer of image-water nanofluid. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2015;294:299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Selimefendigil F, Chamkha AJ. Natural convection of a hybrid nanofluid-filled triangular annulus with an opening. Comput Thermal Sci. 2016;8:555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Muftuoglu A, Bilgen E. Natural convection in an open square cavity with discrete heaters at their optimized positions. Int J Therm Sci. 2008;47:369–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hsu TH, Hong KY. Natural convection of micropolar fluids in an open cavity. Numer Heat Transf Part A. 2006;50:281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bilgen E, Muftuoglu A. Natural convection in an open square cavity with slots. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2008;35:896–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kefayati G. Simulation of magnetic field effect on natural convection of non-newtonian power-law fluids in a sinusoidal heated cavity using FDLBM. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2014;53:139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kefayati G. FDLBM simulation of magnetic field effect on non-newtonian blood flow in a cavity driven by the motion of two facing lids. Powder Technol. 2014;253:325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mendu SS, Das P. Flow of power-law fluids in a cavity driven by the motion of two facing lids—a simulation by lattice boltzmann method. J Non Newton Fluid Mech. 2012;175:10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Polat O, Bilgen E. Laminar natural convection in shallow open cavities. Int J Therm Sci. 2002;41:360–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maxwell J. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1873.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brinkman H. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J Chem Phys. 1952;20:571–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pirmohammadi M, Ghassemi M. Effect of magnetic field on convection heat transfer inside a tilted square enclosure. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2009;36:776–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sarris I, Zikos G, Grecos A, Vlachos N. On the limits of validity of the low magnetic reynolds number approximation in MHD natural-convection heat transfer. Numer Heat Transf Part B. 2006;50:158–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCelal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering Department, Prince Sultan Endowment for Energy and EnvironmentPrince Mohammad Bin Fahd UniversityAl-KhobarSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.RAK Research and Innovation CenterAmerican University of Ras Al KhaimahRas Al KhaimahUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations