Skip to main content
Log in

The role of lattice mismatch in heterogeneous nucleation of pure Al on Al2O3 single-crystal substrates with different termination planes

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Al solidification on Al2O3 single-crystal substrates with (0001) and (11\( \overline{2} \)0) termination surfaces was performed to investigate whether the lattice mismatch can influence the heterogeneous nucleation when the same kind of substrate was employed. Nucleation undercooling was measured via differential scanning calorimeter to present the nucleation potency of Al on selected substrates. The measured results show that the lower undercooling was achieved in Al/Al2O3(11\( \overline{2} \)0), which means that the Al has a higher nucleation potency on Al2O3(11\( \overline{2} \)0) substrates. This is consistent with the calculated lattice misfit of Al/Al2O3(0001) and Al/Al2O3(11\( \overline{2} \)0) based on Bramfitt two-dimensional model because the lowest lattice misfit of Al/Al2O3(11\( \overline{2} \)0) is less than that of Al/Al2O3(0001). Moreover, the corresponding orientation relationships at the interface achieved by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy are almost the same with the predicted one from lattice misfit calculation. It is proved that the lattice misfit does affect the heterogeneous nucleation even the melted metals nucleated on the substrates made of the same kind of material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Todoroki H, Lertarom R, Suzuki T, et al. Solidification of steel droplets against a water cooled copper mold. In: Proceedings of the McLean symposium; 1998. p. 155–75.

  2. Greer AL, Bunn AM, Tronche A, et al. Modelling of inoculation of metallic melts: application to grain refinement of aluminium by Al–Ti–B. Acta Mater. 2000;48(11):2823–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng Q, Xu S. Thermodynamics and characteristics of heterogeneous nucleation on fractal surfaces. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119(49):27426–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Qian M, Ma J. The characteristics of heterogeneous nucleation on concave surfaces and implications for directed nucleation or surface activity by surface nanopatterning. J Cryst Growth. 2012;355(1):73–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Król M, Staszuk M, Mikuszewski T, et al. Refinement effect of RE in light weight Mg–Li–Al alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;134(1):333–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu M, Zhang Q, Zhao B, et al. Solidification behavior of indium droplets embedded in aluminum by differential fast scanning calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;117:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glicksman ME, Childs WJ. Nucleation catalysis in supercooled liquid tin. Acta Metall. 1962;10(10):925–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marotta A, Buri A, Branda F. Heterogeneous bulk nucleation and differential thermal analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1981;21(2):227–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ujhelyiova A, Marcinčin A, Kišš M, et al. Nucleation and crystallization of polypropylene filled with BaSO4. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1996;46(2):619–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turnbull D. The kinetics of precipitation of barium sulfate from aqueous solution. Acta Metall. 1953;1(6):684–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Turnbull D, Vonnegut B. Nucleation catalysis. Ind Eng Chem. 1952;44(6):1292–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bramfitt BL. The effect of carbide and nitride additions on the heterogeneous nucleation behavior of liquid iron. Metall Trans. 1970;1(7):1987–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Fan Z, Zhou X, et al. Characterisation of magnesium oxide and its interface with α-Mg in Mg–Al-based alloys. Philos Mag Lett. 2011;91(8):516–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Q, Bu F, Meng F, et al. The improved effects by the combinative addition of lanthanum and samarium on the microstructures and the tensile properties of high-pressure die-cast Mg–4Al-based alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;628:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma G, Han G, Liu X, et al. Grain refining efficiency of a new Al–1B–0.6C master alloy on AZ63 magnesium alloy. J Alloys Comp. 2010;49(1):165–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Zhou W, Hu P, et al. Effect of Al–3Nb–1B master alloy on the grain refinement of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Metall Mater Trans B. 2016;47:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Lu W, Hu Q, et al. Interfacial tuning for the nucleation of liquid AlCu alloy. Acta Mater. 2017;139:75–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shibata H, Watanabe Y, Nakajima K, et al. Degree of undercooling and contact angle of pure iron at 1933K on single-crystal Al2O3, MgO, and MgAl2O4 under argon atmosphere with controlled oxygen partial pressure. ISIJ Int. 2009;49(7):985–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee SB, Kim YM. Direct observation of in-plane ordering in the liquid at a liquid Al/α-Al2O3 (1102) interface. Acta Mater. 2011;59(4):1383–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Figgins BF, Jones GO, Riley DP. LXXVII. The thermal expansion of aluminium at low temperatures as measured by an X-ray diffraction method. Philos Mag. 1956;1(8):747–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Newnham RE, de Haan YM. Refinement of the αAl2O3, Ti2O3, V2O3 and Cr2O3 structures. Z Kristallogr. 1962;117(2–3):235–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun J, Wang D, Zhang Y, et al. Heterogeneous nucleation of pure Al on MgO single crystal substrate accompanied by a MgAl2O4 buffer layer. J Alloy Compd. 2018;753:543–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheng C, Sun J, Wang DP, et al. Heterogeneous nucleation of pure gold on highly smooth ceramic substrates and the influence of lattice misfit and cooling rate. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(6):4612–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maxwell I, Hellawell A. A simple model for grain refinement during solidification. Acta Metall. 1975;23:229–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiller WA, Takahashi T. The electrostatic contribution in heterogeneous nucleation theory: pure liquids. Acta Metall. 1969;17(4):483–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Peng for stimulating discussions and TEM examination, X. Liang for FIB analysis and the Instrumental Analysis and Research Center of SHU. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51320105003, 51704192, U1760204) and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 15520710800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunhu Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Chang, W., Shen, Y. et al. The role of lattice mismatch in heterogeneous nucleation of pure Al on Al2O3 single-crystal substrates with different termination planes. J Therm Anal Calorim 137, 791–797 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-07990-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-07990-z

Keywords

Navigation