Abstract
In this paper, with the aim of enhancing the thermal conductivity of the fluid, a nanofluid is prepared based on SiO2. A series of experimental tests were carried out for both laminar and forced convection regimes in a horizontal tube with two different geometric shapes (circular and square cross section) subjected to constant wall heat flux (4735 W m−2). A comparative study has been done to investigate the effect of the geometry on the convective heat transfer. Moreover, the effect of the volume concentration on the behavior of the nanofluid and the base fluid was evaluated by comparing various volume concentrations (0.05, 0.07 and 0.2%). The experiments were done under two different conditions: constant Reynolds number and constant mass flow rate. It was found that the circular-shaped channel could be better for heat transfer purposes at the same flow rate, while the square-shaped channel has a higher heat transfer coefficient at the same Reynolds number. The slope of the lines for the square cross section is more than that for circular cross sections which result in a steeper increase in average heat transfer coefficient versus Reynolds number in the square-shaped channel. The increase of the Reynolds number may decrease the dead zones in the square channel that causes the double enhancement of the average heat transfer coefficient.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Abbreviations
- k :
-
Conductivity
- φ :
-
Volume concentration
- μ :
-
Viscosity
- ρ :
-
Density
- \(C_{\text{p}}\) :
-
Specific heat
- \(Q_{\text{loss}}\) :
-
Heat loss
- V :
-
Supply voltage
- R :
-
Wire resistance
- \(T_{\text{out}}\) :
-
Outlet temperature
- \(T_{\text{in}}\) :
-
Inlet temperature
- \(\dot{m}\) :
-
Mass flow rate
- P :
-
Cross-sectional perimeter
- L :
-
Pipe length
- Re :
-
Reynolds number
- Nu :
-
Nusselt number
- Pr :
-
Prandtl number
- D :
-
Pipe diameter
- x :
-
Axial distance
- h :
-
Convective heat transfer coefficient
References
Minea AA. Numerical studies on heat transfer enhancement in different closed enclosures heated symmetrically. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121(2):711–20.
Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N. Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles (dispersion of y-A12O3, SiO2, and TiO2 ultra-fine particles). Netsu Bussei. 1993;4(4):227–33.
Chon CH, Kihm KD. Thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids by Brownian motion. J Heat Transf. 2005;127(8):810.
Bergman TL. Effect of reduced specific heats of nanofluids on single phase, laminar internal forced convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:1240–4.
Ferrouillat S, Bontemps A, Ribeiro JP, Gruss JA, Soranio O. Hydraulic and heat transfer study of SiO2/water nanofluids in horizontal tubes with imposed wall temperature boundary conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2011;32:424–39.
Rea U, McKrell T, Hu LW, Buongiorno J. Laminar convective heat transfer and viscous pressure loss of alumina–water and zirconia–water nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:2042–8.
Ebrahimnia-Bajestan E, Niazmand H, Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S. Numerical investigation of effective parameters in convective heat transfer of nanofluids flowing under a laminar flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:4376–88.
Peyghambarzadeh SM, Hashemabadi SH, Seifi Jamnani M, Hoseini SM. Improving the cooling performance of automobile radiator with Al2O3/water nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng. 2011;31:1833–8.
Özerinç S, Yazicioglu AG, Kakaç S. Numerical analysis of laminar forced convection with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of nanofluids and thermal dispersion. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;62:138–48.
Lotfi R, Saboohi Y, Rashidi AM. Numerical study of forced convective heat transfer of nanofluids: comparison of different approaches. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2010;37:74–8.
Nassan TH, Heris SZ, Noie SH. A comparison of experimental heat transfer characteristics for Al2O3/water and CuO/water nanofluids in square cross-section duct. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37:924–8.
Escher W, Brunschwiler T, Shalkevich N, Burgi T, Michel B, Poulikakos D. On the cooling of electronics with nanofluids. J Heat Transf. 2011;133:051401–11.
Barbés B, Páramo R, Blanco E, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Piñeiro MM, Legido JL, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity measurements of Al2O3 nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(2):1615–25.
Minea AA. Comparative study of turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids: effect of thermophysical properties on figure of merit ratio. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;124(1):407–16.
Moghadassi A, Masoud Hosseini S, Henneke D, Elkamel A. A model of nanofluids effective thermal conductivity based on dimensionless groups. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96(1):81–4.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117(2):675–81.
Mehrjou B, Heris SZ, Mohamadifard K. Experimental study of CuO/water nanofluid turbulent convective heat transfer in square cross-section duct. Exp Heat Transf. 2015;28(3):282–97.
Esmaeilzadeh E, Almohammadi H, Nasiri Vatan Sh, Omrani AN. Experimental investigation of hydrodynamics and heat transfer characteristics of γ-Al2O3/water under laminar flow inside a horizontal tube. Int J Therm Sci. 2013;63:31–7.
Cengel YA, Ghajar AJ, Ma H. Heat and mass transfer: fundamentals & applications. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
Alawi OA, Sidik NAC, Mohammed HA, Syahrullail S. Fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids in heat pipes: a review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2014;56:50–62.
Das K, Duari PR, Kundu PK. Numerical simulation of nanofluid flow with convective boundary condition. J Egypt Math Soc. 2015;23(2):435–9.
Devendiran DK, Amirtham VA. A review on preparation, characterization, properties and applications of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;60:21–40.
Solangi KH, Kazi SN, Luhur MR, Badarudin A, Amiri A, Sadri R, Zubir MNM, Gharehkhani S, Teng KH. A comprehensive review of thermo-physical properties and convective heat transfer to nanofluids. Energy. 2015;89:1065–86.
Halelfadl S, Maré T, Estellé P. Efficiency of carbon nanotubes water based nanofluids as coolants. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;53:104–10.
Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F. Heat transfer, pressure drop and fouling studies of multi-walled carbon nanotube nano-fluids inside a plate heat exchanger. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2016;72:1–11.
Huminic G, Huminic A. Heat transfer and flow characteristics of conventional fluids and nanofluids in curved tubes: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:1327–47.
Purohit N, Purohit VA, Purohit K. Assessment of nanofluids for laminar convective heat transfer: a numerical study. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2016;19(1):574–86.
Zarringhalam M, Karimipour A, Toghraie D. Experimental study of the effect of solid volume fraction and Reynolds number on heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop of CuO–water nanofluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2016;76:342–51.
Vanaki ShM, Ganesan P, Mohammed HA. Numerical study of convective heat transfer of nanofluids: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:1212–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pourfayaz, F., Sanjarian, N., Kasaeian, A. et al. An experimental comparison of SiO2/water nanofluid heat transfer in square and circular cross-sectional channels. J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1577–1586 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6500-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6500-4