Abstract
The understanding of kinetic parameters and torrefaction mechanism is required for the design of the operational equipment for biomass torrefaction. This study presents the results from thermogravimetric analyses of oil palm shell (PS), mesocarp (MF) and empty fruit bunches (EFB) under inert atmosphere mimicking torrefaction. Torrefaction was studied isothermally within the range of 200–300 °C to analyze the kinetics of this process. The kinetic data were used to predict the torrefaction performance of all the three oil palm biomass using a two-stage decomposition mechanism that closely matches the experimental data. The activation energies corresponding to the first-stage reactions are 39.22, 28.61 and 60.47 kJ mol−1 for EFB, MF and PS, respectively. Activation energy for EFB is highest for the second-stage reactions at 35.18 kJ mol−1 followed by PS at 25.49 kJ mol−1 and MF at 25.49 kJ mol−1.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
British Petroleum G. BP statistical review of world energy. 2013.
DOE U. International energy outlook 20132013. Report No.: DOE/EIA-0484(2013).
USDA. Oilseeds: world markets and Trade2014. Report No.: FOP 01-14.
Basiron Y, Chan KW. The palm oil and its sustainability. J Oil Palm Res. 2004;16(1):1–10.
Lee J-W, Kim Y-H, Lee S-M, Lee H-W. Optimizing the torrefaction of mixed softwood by response surface methodology for biomass upgrading to high energy density. Bioresour Technol. 2012;116:471–6.
Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG. Torrefaction of wood: part 2. Analysis of products. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2006;77(1):35–40.
Phanphanich M, Mani S. Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2010;102(2):1246–53.
Chew JJ, Doshi V. Recent advances in biomass pretreatment—torrefaction fundamentals and technology. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2011;15(8):4212–22.
Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG. Torrefaction of wood: part 1. Weight loss kinetics. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2006;77(1):28–34.
Chen W-H, Kuo P-C. Isothermal torrefaction kinetics of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and xylan using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy. 2011;36(11):6451–60.
Pétrissans A, Younsi R, Chaouch M, Gérardin P, Pétrissans M. Experimental and numerical analysis of wood thermodegradation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;109(2):907–14.
Bates RB, Ghoniem AF. Biomass torrefaction: modeling of reaction thermochemistry. Bioresour Technol. 2013;134:331–40.
Di Blasi C, Lanzetta M. Intrinsic kinetics of isothermal xylan degradation in inert atmosphere. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1997;40–41:287–303.
Donahue CJ, Rais EA. Proximate analysis of coal. J Chem Educ. 2009;86(2):222–4.
Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Zheng C, Lee DH, Liang DT. In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuel.
García-Núñez JA, García-Pérez M, Das KC. Determination of kinetic parameters of thermal degradation of palm oil mill by-products using thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. Trans ASABE. 2008;51(2):547–57.
Law KN, Wan Daud WR, Ghazali A. Morphological and chemical nature of fiber strands of oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB). Bioresources. 2007;2(3):351–62.
Luangkiattikhun P, Tangsathitkulchai C, Tangsathitkulchai M. Non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis of oil-palm solid wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(5):986–97.
Braga RM, Melo DMA, Aquino FM, Freitas JCO, Melo MAF, Barros JMF, et al. Characterization and comparative study of pyrolysis kinetics of the rice husk and the elephant grass. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;115(2):1915–20.
Varhegyi G, Antal MJ, Jakab E, Szabo P. Kinetic modeling of biomass pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1997;42(1):73–87.
Khazraie Shoulaifar T, DeMartini N, Karlström O, Hupa M. Impact of organically bonded potassium on torrefaction: part 1. Experimental. Fuel. 2016;165:544–52.
Nanou P, Carbo MC, Kiel JHA. Detailed mapping of the mass and energy balance of a continuous biomass torrefaction plant. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.012.
Ren S, Lei H, Wang L, Bu Q, Chen S, Wu J. Thermal behaviour and kinetic study for woody biomass torrefaction and torrefied biomass pyrolysis by TGA. Biosys Eng. 2013;116(4):420–6.
White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2011;91(1):1–33.
Yaman S. Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Convers Manage. 2004;45(5):651–71.
Braga RM, Costa TR, Freitas JCO, Barros JMF, Melo DMA, Melo MAF. Pyrolysis kinetics of elephant grass pretreated biomasses. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117(3):1341–8.
Yang H, Yan R, Chin T, Liang DT, Chen H, Zheng C. Thermogravimetric analysis − Fourier transform infrared analysis of palm oil waste pyrolysis. Energy Fuel. 2004;18(6):1814–21.
Guo J, Lua A. Kinetic study on pyrolysis of extracted oil palm fiber. Isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2000;59(3):763–74.
Guo J, Lua AC. Kinetic study on pyrolytic process of oil-palm solid waste using two-step consecutive reaction model. Biomass Bioenerg. 2001;20(3):223–33.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding support from Monash University for this work under the Major Grant EM1-11 and Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) FRGS/1/2012/ST01/MUSM/03/2 and Taylor’s University Major Grant TRGS/MFS2/2013/SOE/006. We are also thankful to Dr. Luguang Chen for her technical assistance with the experiments and useful advice in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chew, JJ., Doshi, V., Yong, ST. et al. Kinetic study of torrefaction of oil palm shell, mesocarp and empty fruit bunch. J Therm Anal Calorim 126, 709–715 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5518-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5518-3