Abstract
Nanofluids are considered to offer important advantages over conventional heat transfer fluids, but their thermophysical properties are not known precisely. In this paper, essential aspects of the turbulent-flow convective heat transfer of nanofluids are compared in detail based on few figures of merits relevant to their applications. The considered aspects were: (1) model selection—the nanofluid thermophysical properties (related to heat transfer performance) and the comparison criteria over their base fluids, and (2) effectiveness—the enhancement of the heat transfer coefficients of nanofluids over their base fluids. Few different models selected from the literature are used to express nanofluid properties in terms of particle loading, and they lead to different results in a classical problem of replacement of a single fluid by a nanofluid in a given application. As the base of comparison, the pumping power similarity condition was adopted, and the analysis revealed that nanofluid benefits in terms of energy performance are questionable, even if the heat transfer enhancement is obvious. Finally, this study aims to quantify the accuracy of existing models for nanofluid evaluation. The results reported in the present paper are believed to be useful for the thermal optimization of nanofluid flow inside tubes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Abbreviations
- c p :
-
Specific heat (J kg−1 K−1)
- D :
-
Hydraulic diameter (m)
- f :
-
Fanning friction factor (–)
- FOM1:
-
Figure of merit adopted from Ref. [43] (–)
- FOM2:
-
Figure of merit adopted from Ref. [24] (–)
- h :
-
Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)
- L :
-
Channel length (m)
- Mo :
-
Mouromtseff number (–)
- Nu :
-
Nusselt number (–)
- p :
-
Pressure (Pa)
- P :
-
Pumping power (W)
- R :
-
Figure-of-merit ratio (–)
- Pr :
-
Prandtl number (–)
- Re :
-
Reynolds number (–)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- q :
-
Wall heat flux (W m−2)
- Q :
-
Volume flow rate (W)
- x, y, z :
-
Cartesian coordinates (m)
- v :
-
Velocity (m s−1)
- β :
-
Volumetric expansion coefficient (K−1)
- φ :
-
Volume fraction of particles (%)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg m−3)
- μ :
-
Fluid dynamic viscosity (kg m−1 s−1)
- bf:
-
Refers to base fluid
- f:
-
Fluid
- nf:
-
Refers to nanofluid property
- r:
-
Refers to “nanofluid/base fluid” ratio
References
Wong KV, De Leon O. Applications of nanofluids: current and future. Adv Mech Eng. 2010; Article ID 519659:1–11.
Godson L, Raja B, Lal DM, Wongwises S. Enhancement of heat transfer using nanofluids—an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:629–41.
Xie H, Yu W, Li Y, Chen L. Discussion on the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6:124–9.
Xuan Y, Li Q. Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2000;21:58–64.
Yu W, Xie, A Review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater. 2012; Article ID 435873:1–17.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S. Turbulent forced convection heat transfer and thermophysical properties of MgO–water nanofluid with consideration of different nanoparticles diameter, an empirical study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119:1205–13.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Bahiraei M, Toghraie D, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity modeling of MgO/EG nanofluids using experimental data and artificial neural network. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;. doi:10.1007/s10973-014-3771-x.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Wongwises S, Toghraie D. An experimental study on the effect of diameter on thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Fe/water nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119:1817–24.
Barbes B, Paramo R, Blanco E, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity measurements of CuO nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:1883–91.
Sarkar J. A critical review on convective heat transfer correlations of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:3271–7.
Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P. Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and it’s implications for thermal applications. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89:133108-3.
Escher W, Brunschwiler T, Shalkevich N, Shalkevich A, Burgi T, Michel B, Poulikakos D. On the cooling of electronics with nanofluids. J Heat Transf. 2011;133:1–11.
Moghadassi AR, Masoud Hosseini S, Henneke D, Elkamel A. A model of nanofluids effective thermal conductivity based on dimensionless groups. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96:81–4.
Barbes B, Paramo R, Blanco E, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Pineiro MM, Legido JL, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity measurements of Al2O3 nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111:1615–25.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids: measurement, correlation, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons with literature reports. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:675–81.
Bahiraei M, Mashaei PR. Using nanofluid as a smart suspension in cooling channels with discrete heat sources: numerical investigation and modeling. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119:2079–91.
Bashirnezhad K, Rashidi MM, Yang Z, Bazri S, Yan WM. A comprehensive review of last experimental studies on thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;122:863–84.
Malvandi A, Ganji DD. Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects on slip flow of alumina/water nanofluid inside a circular microchannel in the presence of a magnetic field. Int J Therm Sci. 2014;84:196–206.
Malvandi A, Ganji DD. Magneto hydro dynamic mixed convective flow of Al2O3–water nanofluid inside a vertical microtube. J Magn Magn Mater. 2014;369:132–41.
Malvandi A, Moshizi SA, Ganji DD. Effect of magnetic fields on heat convection inside a concentric annulus filled with Al2O3–water nanofluid. Adv Powder Technol. 2014;25:1817–24.
Vizureanu P, Cimpoesu N, Radu V, Agop M. Investigations on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes reinforced composites. Exp Heat Transf. 2015;28:37–57.
Yu W, France DM, Timofeeva EV, Singh D, Routbort JL. Thermophysical property-related comparison criteria for nanofluid heat transfer enhancement in turbulent flow. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96:213109.
Timofeeva EV, Yu W, France DM, Singh D, Routbort JL. Nanofluids for heat transfer: an engineering approach. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6:1–7.
Yu W, France DM, Timofeeva EV, Singh D, Routbort JL. Comparative review of turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:5380–96.
Mansour RB, Galanis N, Nguyen CT. Effect of uncertainties in physical properties on forced convection heat transfer with nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:240–9.
Ho CJ, Chen MW, Li ZW. Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51:4506–16.
Oztop HF, Abu-Nada E. Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:1326–36.
Manca O, Nardini S, Ricci D. Enhancement of forced convection in ribbed channels by nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;37:280–92.
Gosselin L, da Silva A. Combined heat transfer and power dissipation optimization of nanofluid flow. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85:4160–2.
Bianco V, Manca O, Nardini S. Numerical investigation on nanofluids turbulent convection heat transfer inside a circular tube. Int J Therm Sci. 2011;50:341–9.
Vajjha RS, Das DK, Mahagaonkar BM. Density measurements of different nanofluids and their comparison with theory. Pet Sci Technol. 2009;27:612–24.
Pak BC, Cho YI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf. 1998;11:151–70.
Li Q, Xuan Y. Convective heat transfer performances of fluids with nano-particles. In: Proceedings of the 12th international heat transfer conference. Grenoble, France; 2002. p. 483–8.
Dittus FW, Boelter LMK. Univ. California (Berkeley) Publ. Eng. 1930; 2:443.
Malvandi A, Ganji DD. Effects of nanoparticle migration and asymmetric heating on magneto hydro dynamic forced convection of alumina/water nanofluid in microchannels. Eur J Mech B/Fluids. 2015;52:169–84.
Kazemi-Beydokhti A, Heris SZ. Thermal optimization of combined heat and power (CHP) systems using nanofluids. Energy. 2012;44:241–7.
Mahmud S, Fraser RA. Second law analysis of forced convection in a circular duct for non-Newtonian fluids. Energy. 2006;31:1890–908.
Myat A, Thu K, Kim YD, Saha BB, Choon NK. Entropy generation minimization: a practical approach for performance evaluation of temperature cascaded co-generation plants. Energy. 2012;46:493–521.
Poulikakos D, Johnson JM. Second law analysis of combined heat and mass transfer phenomena in external flow. Energy. 1989;14:67–73.
Mouromtseff IE. Water and forced-air cooling of vacuum tubes. Proc IRE. 1942;30:190–205.
Bergles AE. Evolution of cooling technology for electrical, electronic, and microelectronic equipment. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol. 2003;26:6–15.
Bergles AE, Bar-Cohen A. Advances in thermal modeling of electronic components and systems, vol. 2. New York: ASME Press; 1990.
Yeh LT, Chu RC. Thermal management of microelectronic equipment—heat transfer theory, analysis methods, and design practices. New York: ASME Press; 2002.
Blasius H. Das Ähnlichkeitsgesetz bei Reibungsvorgängen in Flüssigkeiten, Forschungsarbeiten des Ingenieurwesens. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. 1913;131:41.
Bianco V, Manca O, Nardini S. Performance analysis of turbulent convection heat transfer of Al2O3 water-nanofluid in circular tubes at constant wall temperature. Energy. 2014;77:403–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minea, A.A. Comparative study of turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim 124, 407–416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5166-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5166-z