Abstract
A series of experiments have been carried out to determine the thermal conductivity and viscosity of a novel nanofluid, i.e., Mg(OH)2/ethylene glycol (EG). The thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids with volume fractions by 2 % in the temperature range of 25–55 °C are measured. The results unfold that in the temperature of 35 °C, called critical temperature, the ratio of nanofluid viscosity to water viscosity is minimized. This critical temperature reveals that it is more advantageous to use Mg(OH)2/EG nanofluids instead of water at temperatures higher than 35 °C from the pressure drop and pumping power viewpoint.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ghadimi A, Henk Metselaar I. The influence of surfactant and ultrasonic processing on improvement of stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of titania nanofluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2013;51:1–9.
Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar HSC. A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:4051–68.
Witharana S, Palabiyik I, Musina Z, Ding Y. Stability of glycol nanofluids—the theory and experiment. Powder Technol. 2013;239:72–7.
Mahian O, Kianifar A, Wongwises S. Dispersion of ZnO nanoparticles in a mixture of ethylene glycol–water, exploration of temperature-dependent density, and sensitivity analysis. J Cluster Sci. 2013;24:1103–14.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids: measurement, correlation, sensitivity analysis, and comparisons with literature reports. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:675–81.
Barbés B, Páramo R, Blanco E, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Pineiro MM, Legido JL, Casanova C. Thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity measurements of Al2O3 nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;11:1615–25.
Halelfadl S, Maré T, Estellé P. Efficiency of carbon nanotubes water based nanofluids as coolants. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;53:104–10.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Bahiraei M, Toghraie D, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Thermal conductivity modeling of MgO/EG nanofluids using experimental data and artificial neural network. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;. doi:10.1007/s10973-014-4002-1.
Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA. Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:874–85.
Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kalogirou SA, Pop I, Wongwises S. A review of the applications of nanofluids in solar energy. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;57:582–94.
Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA. A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:1646–68.
Wu JM, Zhao J. A review of nanofluid heat transfer and critical heat flux enhancement—research gap to engineering application. Prog Nucl Energy. 2013;66:13–24.
Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Lugo L, Cabaleiro D, Legido JL, Piñeiro MM. Thermophysical profile of ethylene glycol-based ZnO nanofluids. J Chem Thermodyn. 2014;73:23–30.
Cabaleiro D, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Piñeiro MM, Lugo L. Characterization and measurements of thermal conductivity, density and rheological properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles dispersed in (ethane-1,2-diol + water) mixture. J Chem Thermodyn. 2013;58:405–15.
Said Z, Sajid MH, Alim MA, Saidur R, Rahim NA. Experimental investigation of the thermophysical properties of Al2O3-nanofluid and its effect on a flat plate solar collector. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2013;48:99–107.
Yu W, Xie H, Li Y, Chen L. Experimental investigation on thermal conductivity and viscosity of aluminum nitride nanofluid. Particuology. 2011;9:187–91.
Su F, Ma X, Lan Z. The effect of carbon nanotubes on the physical properties of a binary nanofluid. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2011;42:252–7.
Leea G, Kima C, Leea M, Rheea C, Kimc S, Kim C. Thermal conductivity enhancement of ZnO nanofluid using a one-step physical method. Thermochim Acta. 2012;542:24–7.
Ghanbarpour M, Bitaraf Haghigi E, Khodabandeh R. Thermal properties and rheological behavior of water based Al2O3 nanofluid as a heat transfer fluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;53:227–35.
Hemmat Esfe M, Saedodin S, Mahmoodi M. Experimental studies on the convective heat transfer performance and thermophysical properties of MgO–water nanofluid under turbulent flow. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;52:68–78.
Hemmat Esfe S, Saedodin S, Mahian O, Wongwises S. Heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop of COOH-functionalized DWCNTs/water nanofluid in turbulent flow at low concentrations. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;73:186–94.
Estellé P, Halelfadl S, Maré T. Lignin as dispersant for water-based carbon nanotubes nanofluids: Impact on viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int Commun Heat and Mass Transf. 2014;57:8–12.
Manimaran R, Palaniradja K, Alagumurthi N, Sendhilnathan S, Hussain J. Preparation and characterization of copper oxide nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Appl Nanosci. 2014;4:163–7.
França JMP, Reis F, Vieira SIC, Lourenço MJV, Santos FJV, Nieto de Castro CA, Pádua AAH. Thermophysical properties of ionic liquid dicyanamide (DCA) nanosystems. J Chem Thermodyn. 2014;79:248–57.
Yu W, Xie H, Li Y, Chen L, Wang Q. Experimental investigation on the thermal transport properties of ethylene glycol based nanofluids containing low volume concentration diamond nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2011;380:1–5.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their thanks for the assistance provided by the Nano-rheologic Laboratory of Semnan University Science and Technology Park for providing necessary instruments to carry out the sample preparation and helping in analyzing the samples to complete the article in time, and also express their deepest gratitude to Mr. Molaei, Makki, and Hafezi for their supports.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemmat Esfe, M., Saedodin, S., Asadi, A. et al. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of Mg(OH)2-ethylene glycol nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim 120, 1145–1149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4417-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4417-3