Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 120, Issue 2, pp 1473–1482 | Cite as

Prediction of concentration profiles and theoretical yields in lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis

  • Li Huang
  • Tao Ding
  • Ronghou Liu
  • Junmeng Cai


This work involved the prediction of the concentration profiles and theoretical yields in lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis under real pyrolysis conditions. The competing reaction model was used and verified by the experimental data of the pyrolysis of oilseed rape straw and sesame stalk. The pyrolysis kinetic behaviors of the pyrolysis of peach branch, cotton stalk, and corn stalk under various conditions were simulated based on the model and their chemical compositions. The influences of the heating rate and final temperature on the theoretical yields of pyrolysis products and the pyrolysis time were obtained. Under the same conditions, the pyrolysis of peach branch gave the highest yield of volatile products, while the pyrolysis of cotton stalk gave the highest yield of char. The method presented in this work enables us to predict the concentration profiles and theoretical yields of different lignocellulosic materials under various pyrolysis conditions.


Lignocellulosic biomass Pyrolysis Kinetics Volatile Char 



Financial support from School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (Grant No. NRC201101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51176121), and the Ministry of Agriculture, China (Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest: No. 201003063-09) are acknowledged. The authors would like to appreciate Dr. Xiaojuan Yu from School of Environmental Science & Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University for her help in the chemical analysis of lignocellulosic materials.


  1. 1.
    Bridgwater AV. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;38:68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu W, Mei Y, Zhang L, Liu R, Cai J. Effective activation energies of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 2014;28(6):3916–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(3):848–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yin C. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass for liquid biofuels production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;120:273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Davies S, Hill S, Tucker G. The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: new insights from thermal-analytical and complementary studies. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(19):9272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu W, Cai J, Liu R. Isoconversional kinetic analysis of distributed activation energy model processes for pyrolysis of solid fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(40):14376–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2011;91(1):1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koufopanos CA, Papayannakos N, Maschio G, Lucchesi A. Modelling of the pyrolysis of biomass particles. Studies on kinetics, thermal and heat transfer effects. Can J Chem Eng. 1991;69(4):907–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srivastava VK, Jalan RK. Prediction of concentration in the pyrolysis of biomass material—II. Energy Convers Manag. 1996;37(4):473–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Babu BV, Chaurasia AS. Modeling, simulation and estimation of optimum parameters in pyrolysis of biomass. Energy Convers Manag. 2003;44(13):2135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim S-S, Agblevor FA. Thermogravimetric analysis and fast pyrolysis of Milkweed. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:367–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borges FC, Du Z, Xie Q, Trierweiler JO, Cheng Y, Wan Y, et al. Fast microwave assisted pyrolysis of biomass using microwave absorbent. Bioresour Technol. 2014;156:267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu F, Steele PH, Ruan R. Microwave pyrolysis of corn cob and characteristics of the pyrolytic chars. Energy Sour Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects. 2009;32(5):475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gauthier G, Melkior T, Salvador S, Corbetta M, Frassoldati A, Pierucci S, et al. Pyrolysis of thick biomass particles: experimental and kinetic modelling. Chem Eng Trans. 2013;32:601–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin R, Liu R, Wu J, Wu X, Sun C, Wu C. Influence of particle size on performance of a pilot-scale fixed-bed gasification system. Bioresour Technol. 2012;119:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM E1721-01. Standard test method for determination of carbohydrates in biomass by high performance liquid chromatograph. 2007.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van de Velden M, Baeyens J, Brems A, Janssens B, Dewil R. Fundamentals, kinetics and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction. Renew Energy. 2010;35(1):232–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koufopanos CA, Lucchesi A, Maschio G. Kinetic modelling of the pyrolysis of biomass and biomass components. Can J Chem Eng. 1989;67(1):75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts C. Ordinary differential equations: applications, models, and computing. London: Taylor & Francis; 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Attaway S. Matlab: A practical introduction to programming and problem solving. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nan Z, Yang M, Han W, Liu C, Huang F. Fast pyrolysis oil crops straw and characteristics of bio-oil (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Oil Crop Sci. 2008;30(4):501–5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ateş F, Pütün E, Pütün AE. Fast pyrolysis of sesame stalk: yields and structural analysis of bio-oil. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2004;71(2):779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carpenter D, Westover TL, Czernik S, Jablonski W. Biomass feedstocks for renewable fuel production: a review of the impacts of feedstock and pretreatment on the yield and product distribution of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and vapors. Green Chem. 2014;16(2):384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cai J, Wu W, Liu R, Huber GW. A distributed activation energy model for the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 2013;15(5):1331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Várhegyi G, Bobály B, Jakab E, Chen H. Thermogravimetric study of biomass pyrolysis kinetics. A distributed activation energy model with prediction tests. Energy Fuels. 2010;25(1):24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park J, Lee Y, Ryu C, Park Y-K. Slow pyrolysis of rice straw: analysis of products properties, carbon and energy yields. Bioresour Technol. 2014;155:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang J, Chen T, Wu J, Wu J. Multi-Gaussian-DAEM-reaction model for thermal decompositions of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: comparison of N2 and CO2 atmosphere. Bioresour Technol. 2014;166:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pasangulapati V, Ramachandriya KD, Kumar A, Wilkins MR, Jones CL, Huhnke RL. Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on thermochemical conversion characteristics of the selected biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:663–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomass Energy Engineering Center, School of Agriculture and BiologyShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations