Skip to main content
Log in

Calorimetric characterization of Portland limestone cement produced by intergrinding

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The calorimetric technique provides continuous, direct, and general measurements of the course of coexisting reactions and their interactions during hydration of blended cement at early age. In this article, this technique is used to analyze the influence of compositional and process variables on the early age hydration of Portland limestone cements (PLC) made by intergrinding in a full size-cement plant. Eight cements, the vertices of 23 factorial design, were made with a limestone filler content (LF) of 0 and 24%, a gypsum content (GC) of 2.5, and 5.0%; and a fineness, measured as that fraction retained on a 45 μm sieve (R45), of 5 and 18%, to study their effects on the heat released. In addition, a PLC with a composition nearly to the center point of 23 designs was analyzed. Measurements were performed on cement pastes (w/cm = 0.4) using a semiadiabatic differential calorimeter operating at 20 °C during 48 h. At different time, the heat released was determined and it was modeled using a linear mathematical model including the three variables (LF, R45, CG) and their interactions. The significance of the model, the variables and the interactions was judged using the analysis of variance. Results of model show that heat released is reduced by LF due to physically dilution phenomenon, which is directly proportional to LF content. The R45 exerts its major influence during the development of second peak (12–21 h) but later its effect declines to null contribution. GC retards and attenuates the hydration reactions moderately until 30 h, and then its increase contributes to Q t due to the formation of ettringite and its transformation. The only significant interaction was LF with R45 during the second peak development. Results present good correlation with the isolate measurement of compressive strength at 12, 24, and 48 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentz DP. Cement hydration: building bridges and dams at the microstructure level. Mater Struct. 2007;40(4):397–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lura P, Winnefeld F, Klemm S. Simultaneous measurements of heat of hydration and chemical shrinkage on hardening cement pastes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;101(3):925–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Odler I. Hydration, setting and hardening of Portland cement. In: Hewlett P, editor. Lea’s Chemistry of cement and concrete. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier; 1998. p. 241–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frigione G. Gypsum in cement. In: Ghosh SN, editor. Advances in cement technology: chemistry, manufacture and testing. New Delhi: Tech book International; 2002. p. 87–170.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentz DP. Influence of water-to-cement ratio on hydration kinetics: simple models based on spatial considerations. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(2):238–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentz DP, Garboczi EJ, Haecker CJ, Jensen OM. Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of cement-based materials. Cement Concrete Res. 1999;29(10):1663–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knudsen T. The dispersion model for hydration of Portland cement 1. General concepts. Cement Concrete Res. 1984;14(5):622–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma RL, Pandey SP. Influence of mineral additives on the hydration characteristics of ordinary Portland cement. Cement Concrete Res. 1999;29(9):1525–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Talero R, Rahhal VF. Calorimetric comparison of Portland cements containing silica fume and metakaolin. Is silica fume, like metakaolin, characterized by pozzolanic activity that is more specific than generic? J Therm Anal Calorim. 2007;96(2):383–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uchikawa H, Hanehara S, Shirasaka T, Sawaki D. Effect of admixture on hydration of cement, adsorptive behavior of admixture and fluidity and setting of fresh cement paste. Cement and Concrete Res. 1992;22(6):1115–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Escalante-Garcia JI. Nonevaporable water from neat OPC and replacement materials in composite cements hydrated at different temperatures. Cement and Concrete Res. 2003;33(11):1883–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baron J, Dourve C. Technical and economical aspects of the use of limestone filler additions in cement. World Cement. 1987;18(4):100–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Damtoft JS, Lukasik J, Herfort D, Sorrentino D, Gartner EM. Sustainable development and climate change initiatives. Cement Concrete Res. 2008;38(2):115–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellerbrock HG, Spung S, Kuhlmann K. Particle size distribution and properties of cement. Part III: influence of grinding process. Zement-Kalk-Gips. 1990;43(1):13–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsivilis S, Chaniotakis E, Kakali G, Batis G. An analysis of the properties of Portland limestone cements and concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2002;24(3–4):371–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawrence P, Cyr M, Ringot E. Mineral admixtures in mortars: effect of inert materials on short-term hydration. Cement Concrete Res. 2003;33(12):1939–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cyr M, Lawrence P, Ringot E. Mineral admixtures in mortars: quantification of the physical effects of inert materials on short-term hydration. Cement Concrete Res. 2005;35(4):719–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsivilis S, Kakali G, Chaniotakis E, Souvaridou A. A study on the hydration of Portland limestone cement by means of TG. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1998;52(3):863–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonavetti VL, Rahhal VF, Irassar EF. Studies on the carboaluminate formation in limestone filler-blended cements. Cement Concrete Res. 2001;31(6):853–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bensted J. Some hydration investigations involving Portland cement—effect of calcium carbonate substitution of gypsum. World Cement Technol. 1980;11(8):395–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roszczynialski W, Nocuń-Wczelik W. Studies of cementitious systems with new generation by-products from fluidised bed combustion. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;77(1):151–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery DC, Runger GC, Hubele NF. Engineering statistics. New York: John Wiley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barker AP, Matthews JD. Heat release characteristics of limestone-filled cements. Performance of limestone-filled cements: report of joint BRE/BCA/Cement industry working party, 28 November 1989, Watford: Building Research Establishment; 1993.

  24. Rahhal V, Talero R. Early hydration of Portland cement with crystalline mineral additions. Cement Concrete Res. 2005;35(7):1285–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Poppe AM, DeSchutter G. Analytical hydration model for filler rich self-compacting concrete. J Adv Concr Technol. 2006;4(3):259–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiong X, van Breugel K. Hydration processes of cement blended with limestone powder: experimental study and numerical simulation. In: Grieve G, Owens G editors. Proceedings of the 11th international congress on the chemistry of cement (ICCC) CD-ROM, Durban, 2003. p. 1983–1993.

  27. Rahhal VF, Cabrera O, Delgado A, Pedrajas C, Talero R. C4AF ettringite and calorific synergic effect contribution. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;100(1):57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Powers TC. Structure and physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste. J Am Ceramic Soc. 1958;41(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonavetti V, Donza H, Menendez G, Cabrera O, Irassar EF. Limestone filler cement in low w/c concrete: a rational use of energy. Cement Concrete Res. 2003;33(6):865–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bentz DP, Irassar EF, Bucher BE, Weiss WJ. Limestone fillers conserve cement-Part 1: an analysis based on Powers’ model. Concrete International. 2009;31(11):41–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Irassar EF, Violni D, Rahhal VF, Milanesi C, Trezza MA, Bonavetti VL. Influence of limestone content, gypsum content and fineness on early age properties of Portland limestone cement produced by intergrinding. Cement Concrete Composite. 2011;33(2):192–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is the result of collaboration between Cementos Avellaneda SA (Argentine) and the National University of Center of Province of Buenos Aires. Authors would also like to gratefully acknowledge Eng. Daniel Violini and Eng. Carlos Milanesi for their support during industrial process to make this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. F. Irassar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahhal, V.F., Irassar, E.F., Trezza, M.A. et al. Calorimetric characterization of Portland limestone cement produced by intergrinding. J Therm Anal Calorim 109, 153–161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1575-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1575-9

Keywords

Navigation