Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 841–847 | Cite as

Thermal characterization and electrical properties of Fe-modified cellulose long fibers and micro crystalline cellulose

Article

Abstract

Thermal properties of polylactic acid (PLA) filled with Fe-modified cellulose long fibers (CLF) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) were studied using thermo gravimetric analysis (TG), differential scanning calorimetry, and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The Fe-modified CLFs and MCCs were compared with unmodified samples to study the effect of modification with Fe on electrical conductivity. Results from TG showed that the degradation temperature was higher for all composites when compared to the pure PLA and that the PLA composites filled with unmodified celluloses resulted in the best thermal stability. No comparable difference was found in glass transition temperature (Tg) and melting temperature (Tm) between pure PLA and Fe-modified and unmodified CLF- and MCC-based PLA biocomposites. DMA results showed that the storage modulus in glassy state was increased for the biocomposites when compared to pure PLA. The results obtained from a femtostat showed that electrical conductivity of Fe-modified CLF and MCC samples were higher than that of unmodified samples, thus indicating that the prepared biocomposites have potential uses where conductive biopolymers are needed. These modified fibers can also be tailored for fiber orientation in a matrix when subjected to a magnetic field.

Keywords

Biocomposite Cellulose complexes Polylactic acid Thermal analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Larenjeria E, Carvalho LH, Silva SM, D’Almedia JRM. Influence of fiber orientation on the mechanical properties of polyester/jute composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2006;25(12):1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alemdar A, Sain MM. Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibers: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petersson L, Kvien I, Oksman K. Structure and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposite materials. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67:2535–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alemdar A, Sain MM. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues—wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:1664–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kvien I, Oksman K. Orientation of cellulose nanowhiskers in polyvinylalcohol. Appl Phys A. 2007;87:641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cranston ED, Gray DG. Formation of cellulose based electrostatic layer by layer film in magnetic field. Sci Tech Adv Mater. 2006;7:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Maret G. Orientation of cellulose microcrystals by strong magnetic fields. Macromolecules. 1992;25:4232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J, Yun S, Ounaies Z. Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules. 2006;39:4202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundar ST, Sain MM, Oksman K. Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose long fiber modified by iron salt. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;80:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hudaa MS, Mohanty K, Drazl LT, Schut E, Misra TM. “Green” composites from recycled cellulose and poly(lactic acid): Physico-mechanical and morphological properties evaluation. J Mater Sci. 2005;40:4221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teramoto Y, Nishio Y. Cellulose diacetate-graft-poly(lactic acid)s: synthesis of wide-ranging compositions and their thermal and mechanical properties. Polymer. 2003;44:2701–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suryanegara L, Nakagaito AN, Yano H. The effect of crystallization of PLA on the thermal and mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced PLA composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakagaito AN, Fujimura A, Sakai T, Hama Y, Yano H. Production of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites from sheets obtained by a papermaking-like process. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1293–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewitus D, McCarthy S, Ophir A, Kenig S. The Effect of nanoclays on the properties of PLLA-modified polymers part 1: mechanical and thermal properties. J Polym Environ. 2006;14:171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oksman K, Skrifvars M, Selin JF. Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:1317–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iwatake A, Nogi M, Yano H. Cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:2103–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathew AP, Oksman K, Sain MM. Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;97:2014–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skopenko VV, Amirkhanov VM, Sliva TY, Vasilchenko IS, Anpilova EL, Garnovskii AD. Various types of metal complexes based on chelatingbeta-diketones and their structural analogues. Russ Chem Rev. 2004;73(8):737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hegetschweiler K, Hausherr-Primo L, Koppenol WH, Gramlich V, Odier L, Meyer W, et al. A novel hexanuclear FeIII-cis-inositolato complexes as a model for Fe III-polyol interaction in aqueous solution. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1995;34(20):2242. In English.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biocomposites and Biomaterials ProcessingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Manufacturing and Design of Wood and BionanocompositesLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations