Abstract
In this short communication, a recent article published in the Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, which presents an erroneous conclusion based on incorrect calculations, is critically discussed. Since the observations made in that report are based on part of the content of a publication of my authorship, trying to reject some expressions I presented, obviously it came to my attention. This brief note emphasizes that some of the arguments used and the main conclusion stressed in the manuscript under discussion are wrong and must be dismissed.
References
Senum GI, Yang RT. Rational approximations of integral of Arrhenius function. J Therm Anal. 1977;11:445–9.
Órfão JJM. Review and evaluation of the approximations to the temperature integral. AIChE J. 2007;53:2905–15.
Gautschi W, Cahill WF. Exponential integral and related functions. In: Abramowitz M, Stegun IA, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. National Bureau of Standards: Washington; 1970. pp. 227–51.
Cai JM, Liu RH. On evaluate of the integral methods for the determination of the activation energy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96:331–3.
Cai JM, Liu RH. Precision of integral methods for the determination of the kinetic parameters: use in the kinetic analysis of solid-state reactions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;91:275–8.
Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature. 1964;201:68–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Órfão, J.J.M. On the evaluation of the accuracy of activation energies calculated by integral methods: rebuttal of a putative correction. J Therm Anal Calorim 100, 593–597 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0356-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0356-1