Skip to main content
Log in

Fundamental restrictions of the second-law and Arrhenius plot methods used in the determination of reaction enthalpies in decomposition kinetics

  • Regular Papers
  • Theory/Instrumentation
  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The apparent increase of the reaction enthalpy ΔH with temperature due to the self-cooling and condensation effects is responsible for the fundamental restrictions of the second-law and Arrhenius plot methods related to determination of this parameter. Theoretical analysis and a comparison with the experimental data indicate that the systematic underestimation of ΔH magnitudes determined by the second-law method equals 10–25% for the reactants decomposed to gaseous products and 15–50% for reactants decomposed to solids. Therefore, the use of these methods in decomposition kinetics is hardly acceptable. The replacement of the Arrhenius plot and second-law methods to the much more precise and accurate third-law method is desirable or even obligatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. V. L’vov, Thermochim. Acta, 389 (2002) 199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. V. L’vov, Thermochim. Acta, 424 (2004) 183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. B. V. L’vov, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 79 (2005) 151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. B. V. L’vov, Thermal Decomposition of Solid and Liquid Substances, Polytech. Univ. Publisher, St. Petersburg 2006, (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. V. L’vov, Thermal Decomposition of Solids and Melts. New Thermochemical Approach to the Mechanism, Kinetics and Methodology, Springer, Berlin 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. L. Hoenig and A. W. Searcy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 50 (1967) 460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. L. Hoenig and A. W. Searcy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 49 (1966) 128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. A. Munir and A. W. Searcy, J. Chem. Phys., 42 (1965) 4223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. A. H. Blank and A. W. Searcy, J. Phys. Chem., 72 (1968) 2241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. K. Basu and A. W. Searcy, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., I 72 (1976) 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. K. Powell and A. W. Searcy, Metall. Trans., 11B (1980) 427.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. K. Powell and A. W. Searcy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 61 (1978) 216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. N. Modestov, P. V. Poplaukhin and N. Z. Lyakhov, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 65 (2001) 121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. A. Kirdyashkina and V. B. Okhotnikov, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 36 (1988) 417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. V. B. Okhotnikov, S. E. Petrov, B. I. Yakobson and N. Z. Lyakhov, Reactivity of Solids, 2 (1987) 359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. B. Okhotnikov and N. Z. Lyakhov, J. Solid State Chem., 53 (1984) 161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

L’vov, B.V. Fundamental restrictions of the second-law and Arrhenius plot methods used in the determination of reaction enthalpies in decomposition kinetics. J Therm Anal Calorim 92, 639–642 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8693-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8693-4

Keywords

Navigation