Skip to main content
Log in

Determination and comparison of the essentialwork of fracture (EWF) of two polyester blends

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fracture toughness of blends of polypropylene terephthalate (PPT) with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) were investigated. Binary blends were prepared comprising 10:90, 30:70, 50:50, 70:30 and 90:10 mass/mass%. The fracture toughness was determined for each blend using the essential work of fracture (EWF) method and thin film double edge notched tension (DENT) specimens. The specific essential work of fracture, w e, values obtained for blends of PET/PPT ranged from 27.33 to 37.38 kJ m–2 whilst PBT/PPT blends yielded values ranging from 41.78 to 64.23 kJ m–2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed to assess whether or not crystallinity levels influence the mechanical properties evaluated. The fracture toughness of PPT deteriorated with PET incorporation. However, high we values exceeding that of pure PPT were obtained for PBT/PPT blends across the composition range studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L Vincent SN Connolly F Dolan PH Willcocks SAA Jayaweera R Pendlebury (2006) J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 86 147

    Google Scholar 

  2. KB Broberg (1968) Int. J. Fracture 4 11

    Google Scholar 

  3. KB Broberg (1975) J. Mech. Phys. Solids 23 215 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-5096(75)90017-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B Cotterell JK Reddel (1977) Int. J. Fracture 13 267 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXltlCjsLk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S Hashemi (1993) Plast. Rubber Compos. 20 229 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXmtlamsrk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. WYF Chan JG Williams (1994) Polymer 35 1666 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXjtVSjurY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0032-3861(94)90840-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ECY Ching RKY Li YW Mai (2000) Polym. Eng. Sci. 40 310 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsFyktrw%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/pen.11164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J Karger-Kocsis T Czigány EJ Moskala (1998) Polymer 39 3939 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjslegs7k%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00029-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S Hashemi (2000) Polym. Eng. Sci. 40 132 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhslOjt70%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/pen.11146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S Hashemi (2000) Polym. Eng. Sci. 40 798 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXisVSnuro%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/pen.11209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S Hashemi (2000) Polym. Eng. Sci. 40 1435 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksFyisbo%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/pen.11273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. EQ Clutton et al. (2001) Fracture Mechanics: Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites Elsevier Oxford Chapter 2

    Google Scholar 

  13. DE Mouzakis J Karger-Kocsis EJ Moskala (2000) J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 19 1615 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXns1ens78%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006797522901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A Arkhireyeva S Hashemi (2001) Plast. Rubber Compos. 30 125 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsVemsrw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A Arkhireyeva S Hashemi (2002) J. Mater. Sci. 37 3675 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlsFKntLk%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016561225281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Hashemi (2002) Polymer 43 4033 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjtlKltrY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00204-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R Hill (1952) J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1 19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-5096(52)90003-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C Hwo T Forschner R Lowtan D Gwyn B Cristea (1999) J. Plast. Film Sheet. 15 219 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXkvVOqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1106/9JG9-2UDP-AKH1-KNQ0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J Karger-Kocsis EJ Moskala PP Shang (2000) J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 63 671 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010123617593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The Advanced Thermal Analysis System Databank [online], http://web.utk.edu/~athas/databank/intro.html, accessed 15th May 2003.

  21. J Wu YW Mai (1996) Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 2275 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XmtFejuro%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/pen.10626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Connolly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, L., Connolly, S.N., Dolan, F. et al. Determination and comparison of the essentialwork of fracture (EWF) of two polyester blends. J Therm Anal Calorim 86, 155–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-006-7596-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-006-7596-0

Keywords

Navigation