Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of enthalpy relaxation between two different molecular masses of a bisphenol-A polycarbonate

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present work is an extension of an earlier study that compared the stress relaxation between two molecular masses of a bisphenol-A polycarbonate due to thermal aging. The enthalpy relaxation of the same materials has been characterized. First, by measuring the change in enthalpy loss (ΔHa) and fictive temperature (Tf) as a function of aging temperature (Ta) ranging from -25 to 120°C, using differential scanning calorimetry. For the limited aging time of 120 h, ΔHa and Tf changes were only appreciable for (Tg -70 K)<Ta<Tg . While the influence of molecular mass was somewhat discernible, enthalpy measurements were not as sensitive as stress relaxation tests in differentiating molecular mass effects. In a second investigation, the kinetics of enthalpy relaxation upon isothermal aging at 130°C was evaluated using the peak shift method and found to be comparable to literature values. The plot of ΔHa as a function of log (aging time) showed two distinct regions: a brief non-linear portion (less than 1 h aging) which is followed by a linear relationship as typically reported in the literature. In contrast to the linear region, the non-linear relaxation behaviour of the poorly aged state does not appear to be dependent on molecular mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee-Sullivan, P., Bettle, M. Comparison of enthalpy relaxation between two different molecular masses of a bisphenol-A polycarbonate. J Therm Anal Calorim 81, 169–177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0763-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0763-x

Navigation