Abstract
Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of school resources (i.e., material, human, and social) for teaching science to diverse student groups were examined across three school districts from one state. As part of a 3-year curricular and professional development intervention, we examined the effect on teachers’ perceptions after their first year of participation. The study involved 103 fifth-grade teachers from 33 schools participating in the intervention and 116 teachers from 33 control schools. The teachers completed a survey at the beginning and end of the school year. As a result of the intervention, teachers in the treatment group reported more positive perceptions of school resources than teachers in the control group.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
The What Works Clearinghouse adopted the Benjamini–Hochberg method (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995) to correct for multiple comparisons. The traditional approach for adjusting for multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni method, was shown to be unnecessarily stringent for many practical situations. To apply the Benjamini–Hochberg method, we followed the steps outlined in the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 3.0, pp. G1–G5.
References
Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375–395.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B Methodological, 57, 289–300.
Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97, 830–847.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. In C. Faltis & J. Abedi (Eds.), Review of research in education: Extraordinary pedagogies for working within school settings serving nondominant students (Vol. 37, pp. 298–341). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
Coburn, C. E., Russell, J. L., Kaufman, J., & Stein, M. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: Teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119, 137–182.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Fathman, A. K., & Crowther, D. T. (Eds.). (2006). Science for English language learners: K-12 classroom strategies. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gamoran, A., Secada, W. G., & Marrett, C. B. (2006). The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of research in the sociology of education (pp. 37–63). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Heller, J. I., Daeler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 333–362.
Hewson, P. W., Kahle, J. B., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1130–1144.
Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 172–177.
Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1010–1038.
Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 1–12.
Johnson, C. C. (2007). Whole-school collaborative sustained professional development and science teacher change: Signs of progress. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 629–661.
Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 35, 249–263.
King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243–257.
Knapp, M. S., & Plecki, M. L. (2001). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1089–1100.
Lampert, M., Boerst, T. A., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400.
Lee, O. (2005). Science education and English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Integrating science learning and English language development for English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52, 36–42.
Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. (2016). Teachers’ science knowledge and practices with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597.
Lee, O., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2012). Teacher change in elementary science instruction with English language learners: Results of a multi-year professional development intervention across multiple grades. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1–44.
Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Buxton, C. A., Penfield, R. D., & Secada, W. G. (2009). Urban elementary teachers’ perspectives on teaching science to English language learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 263–286.
Loeb, S., Soland, J., & Fox, L. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 457–475.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Data local education agency locale code file: School year 2005–06. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pdf/pau051agen.pdf
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 323–346.
Penuel, W., Riel, M., Krause, A., & Frank, K. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 124–163.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Spybrook, J., Congdon, R., Liu, X., & Martinez, A. (2011). Optimal design software for multi-level and longitudinal research (Version 2.01) [Computer software]. www.wtgrantfoundation.org
Rivera Maulucci, M. S. (2010). Resisting the marginalization of science in an urban school: Coactivating social, cultural, material, and strategic resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 840–860.
Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 883–907.
Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Smith, P. S., Nelson, M. M., Trygstad, P. J., & Banilower, E. R. (2013). Unequal distribution of resources for K-12 science instruction: Data from the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918–940.
Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185–203.
Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.
Tuerk, P. W. (2005). Research in the high-stakes era: Achievement, resources, and no child left behind. Psychological Science, 16, 419–425.
Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DRL 1209309. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Appendix: Teacher Survey Scales
Appendix: Teacher Survey Scales
I. Material Resources
Materials
-
1.
Indicate how much of a barrier each of the following factors is to your science teaching.
Not a barrier | Minor barrier | Moderate barrier | Major barrier | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Shortage of science resources (e.g., trade books, posters, and other supplements) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Shortage of computers and technology for science instruction | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Classroom facility (e.g., lab set-up, insufficient space, furniture, etc.) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Time
-
2.
Indicate how much of a barrier each of the following factors is to your science teaching.
Not a barrier | Minor barrier | Moderate barrier | Major barrier | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(d) Lack of time available to teach science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) Lack of time available for teachers to plan together | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(f) Lack of time available for teacher professional development | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
II. Human Resources
Teaching Practices for Understanding
-
3.
In your most recent teaching position, indicate how often YOU did the following in your science lessons.
Never or almost never | Some lessons | Most lessons | Every lesson | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Use students’ ideas to generate class discussion | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Connect science topics to one another | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
In your most recent teaching position, please indicate how often you ASKED STUDENTS to do the following in your science lessons.
Never or almost never | Some lessons | Most lessons | Every lesson | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(c) Explain the reasoning behind an idea | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Apply science concepts to explain natural events or real world situations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) Talk about things they do at home that are similar to what we do in science class (e.g., measurement, mixture, energy sources) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(f) Discuss their prior knowledge or experience related to the science topic or concept | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Teaching Practices for Inquiry
-
4.
In your most recent teaching position, please indicate how often you ASKED STUDENTS to do the following in your science lessons.
Never or almost never | Some lessons | Most lessons | Every lesson | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Provide evidence (observations, data) to support claims | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Use measurement tools (e.g., ruler, thermometer, scale/balance, timer, graduated cylinder) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Design investigations to test their own ideas | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Analyze data to identify patterns and relationships | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) Write about what was observed and why it happened | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(f) Use simulations or models to construct explanations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Language Development Strategies
-
5.
In your most recent teaching position, please indicate how often YOU did the following in your science lessons.
Never or almost never | Some lessons | Most lessons | Every lesson | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Present information in multiple graphic formats (e.g., graphs, charts, photos, diagrams, and models) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Use realia (including hands-on activities) to help students develop academic language of science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Adjust style of interaction based on varying levels of English proficiency | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Make science text comprehensible (e.g., underline important information, identify main ideas and details, make inferences) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) Make science talk understandable (e.g., clearer enunciation, longer wait time) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(f) Use science terms in various contexts (e.g., introduction, science investigation, writing, and discussion) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(g) Create small groups with varying levels of language proficiency to work together in science class | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Home Language Use
If you have NO ESOL level 1–5 students in your science class(es), skip to question #7.
-
6.
In your most recent teaching position, please indicate how often YOU did the following in your science lessons.
Never or almost never | Some lessons | Most lessons | Every lesson | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Encourage more English proficient students to assist less English proficient students in their home language | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Allow students to discuss science using their home language | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Introduce key science vocabulary terms in both their home language and English | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Allow students to write about science ideas or experiments in their home language | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
III. Social Resources
Teacher Collaboration in Science Practices
-
7.
We would like to know how you feel about teaching science in your school. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement.
Strongly disagree | Disagree | Agree | Strongly agree | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Most teachers in this school have a shared vision of effective science instruction | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) When I have questions about teaching science, I can get good advice from other teachers in this school | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) I can rely on other teachers in this school to help me try out new teaching techniques in science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Teachers plan for science instruction together | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Teacher Collaboration in Science Tasks
-
8.
Please indicate how often YOU did the following with other teachers in your school during a typical month for at least 15 min.
Never | 1 time | 2–3 times | 4–8 times | 9+ times | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Share teaching materials and activities for science | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Share stories about teaching experiences in science | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Analyze a specific student’s work in science | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) Work together to develop activities for science instruction | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) Share assessment tasks that reveal how students understand science | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
School Administration Support of Science
-
9.
We would like to know how you feel about teaching science in your school. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement.
Strongly disagree | Disagree | Agree | Strongly agree | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) The school administration actively supports using the allocated time for science instruction | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) The school administration allocates enough funding for supplementary science resources | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) The school administration clearly communicates the importance of teaching science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(d) The school administration encourages faculty to plan for science instruction together | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(e) The school administration recognizes student achievement in science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(f) The school administration demonstrates knowledge of Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) in Science | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Parent and Family
-
10.
Please indicate how much of a barrier each of the following factors is to science learning in your school.
Not a barrier | Minor barrier | Moderate barrier | Major barrier | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Lack of participation in school activities (e.g., parent-teacher conferences, returning phone calls) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(b) Parent’s (or guardian’s) limited English proficiency | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
(c) Lack of supervision and support for homework | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F. et al. School Resources in Teaching Science to Diverse Student Groups: An Intervention’s Effect on Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 769–794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9487-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9487-y
Keywords
- School resources
- Teacher professional development
- English learners
- Student diversity