Abstract
This qualitative study examined how and why research experiences for teachers (RETs) influenced middle and high school science teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and values about teaching science as inquiry. Changes teachers reported after participating in the RET ranged from modifying a few lessons (belief change) to a comprehensive revision of what and how they taught to better reflect inquiry (attitude change). Some teachers who described comprehensively changing their instruction also described implementing actions meant to change science education within their respective schools, not just their own classrooms (value change). We present how and why teachers went about changes in their practices in relation to the researcher-created teacher inquiry beliefs system spectrum (TIBSS). The TIBSS conceptualizes the range of changes observed in participating teachers. We also describe the features of the RET and external factors, such as personal experiences and school contexts, that teachers cited as influential to these changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


References
Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teachers’ knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Abelson, R. (1979). Differences between belief systems and knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355–366.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behaviour. London: Open University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1–12.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Science Education, 93, 322–360.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613–642.
Damnjanovic, A. (1999). Attitudes toward inquiry-based teaching: Differences between preservice and in-service teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 71–76.
Dubner, J., Silverstein, S. C., Carey, N., Frechtling, J., Busch-Johnsen, T., Han, J.,… & Zounar, E. (2001). Evaluating science research experience for teachers programs and their effects on student interest and academic performance: A preliminary report of an ongoing collaborative study by eight programs. MRS Proceedings, 684(1), GG3–6.
Enderle, P., Dentzau, M., Roseler, K., Southerland, S., Granger, E., Hughes, R., … & Saka, Y. (2014). Examining the influence of RETs on science teacher beliefs and practice. Science Education, 98, 1077–1108.
Fine, S. F., & Glasser, P. H. (1996). The first helping interview: Engaging the client and building trust. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693–705.
Gupta, R. (2012). Values and value system. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 471–473.
Halverson, R., & Clifford, M. (2013). Distributed instructional leadership in high schools. Journal of School Leadership, 23(2), 389–419.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teachers beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–994.
Harwood, W. S., Hansen, J., & Lotter, C. (2006). Measuring teacher beliefs about inquiry: The development of a blended qualitative/quantitative instrument. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 69–79.
Hawkey, K. (1996). Image and the pressure to conform in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 99–108.
Helms, J. V. (1998). Science—and me: Subject matter identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 811–834.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90.
Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222–232.
Kvale, S. (1994). Ten standard responses to qualitative research interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 147–173.
Lakin, J. M., & Wallace, C. S. (2015). Assessing dimensions of inquiry practice by middle school science teachers engaged in a professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 139–162.
Lewis, H. (1990). A question of values. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1318–1347.
Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.
Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and personal religious beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about science-technology and society (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1605–1634.
Marlow, M. P., & Stevens, E. (1999). Science teachers attitudes about inquiry-based science. Retrieved from ERIC database. (No. ED466350)
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peterman, F. P. (1991). An experienced teacher’s emerging constructivist beliefs about teaching and learning. Retrieved from ERIC database. (No. ED336344)
Pop, M. M., Dixon, P., & Grove, C. M. (2010). Research experiences for teachers (RET): Motivation, expectations, and changes to teaching practices due to professional program involvement. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 127–147.
Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150–167.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York, NY: Basic.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Rokeach, M. (1979). Some unresolved issues in theories of beliefs, attitudes, and values. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, pp. 261–304. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Russell, S. H., & Hancock, M. P. (2007). Evaluation of the research experiences for teachers (RET) program: 2001–2006. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 245–253.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963–980.
Westerlund, J. F., García, D. M., Koke, J. R., Taylor, T. A., & Mason, D. S. (2002). Summer scientific research for teachers: The experience and its effect. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 63–83.
Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313.
Dedoose (Version 5.0.11) [Computer Software]. Available from http://www.dedoose.com/
Zacharia, Z. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 792–823.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Herrington, D.G., Bancroft, S.F., Edwards, M.M. et al. I Want to be the Inquiry Guy! How Research Experiences for Teachers Change Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values About Teaching Science as Inquiry. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 183–204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9450-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9450-y
Keywords
- Professional development
- Research experiences for teachers
- Science teacher beliefs, attitudes, and values