Skip to main content
Log in

Educative Mentoring: How a Mentor Supported a Preservice Biology Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Research suggests discipline-specific, educative mentoring can help preservice teachers develop more sophisticated pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). However, there are few studies examining the nature of mentors’ practice and how mentors influence preservice teacher’s (PST) PCK. The purpose of this case study was to describe the strategies used by a secondary biology mentor teacher to support the development of a PST’s PCK. The primary data sources were the transcripts of audio-recorded, daily meetings between the mentor and the PST during two curriculum units: DNA/Protein Synthesis and Evolution. The mentor influenced the PST’s teaching orientation by repeatedly comparing teacher- and student-centered approaches, asking him to consider how students learn, and asking him to self-assess whether his instruction aligned with his teaching beliefs. The mentor helped the PST develop topic-specific knowledge of instructional strategies by sharing strategies she used previously, modeling critical reflection, and inviting him to critically reflect on his own instructional strategies. Topic-specific knowledge of students’ understanding of science was developed by discussing common student misconceptions revealed in students’ conversations and by sharing the results of test-item analysis from previous unit tests. The mentor helped develop the PST’s topic-specific knowledge of assessment by helping him critically analyze and revise previous examinations to better align with the current curriculum units. Topic-specific knowledge of curricula was developed by jointly grappling with decisions about concept sequencing within units. The study includes implications for research, science teacher education, and professional development for mentors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abell, S. K., Dillon, D. R., Hopkins, C. J., McInerney, W. D., & O’Brien, D. G. (1995). Somebody to count on: Mentor/intern relationships in a beginning teacher internship program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achieve Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Achieve Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.

  • Anderson, D. (2007). The role of cooperating teachers’ power in student teaching. Education, 128, 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Tarkin, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akin, F. N., … Uzuntiryaki, E. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97, 903–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, E., & Luft, J. A. (2014). Exploring the written dialogues of two first-year secondary science teachers in an online mentoring program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 130–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, L. U. (2010). Educative mentoring: Promoting reform-based science teaching through mentoring relationships. Science Teacher Education, 94, 1049–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, L. U., & Koballa, T. R. (2007). Mentor advice giving in an alternate certification program for secondary science teaching: Opportunities and roadblocks in developing a knowledge base for teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 817–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M. (2001). Helping primary student teachers understand pupils’ learning: Exploring the student–mentor interaction. Mentoring and Tutoring, 9, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013). The development of prospective secondary biology teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 947–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, C. M., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ reflection on narrative images of inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Beasley, K. (1997). Mentoring as assisted performance: A case of co-planning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2011). Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Science Education, 95, 1124–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, A., & Dahlgren, L. O. (1996). Conceptions of mentoring: An empirical study of mentoring during the school based teacher education. Teacher Education, 12, 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. M., Munford, D., & Orgill, M. (2006). Brokering at the boundary: A prospective science teacher engages students in inquiry. Science Education, 90(3), 522–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen & J. Loughran (Eds.), Reexamining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 29–42). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisham, D. L., Ferguson, J. L., & Brink, B. (2004). Mentoring the mentors: Student teachers’ contributions to the middle school classroom. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2005). A case study of the development of a beginning chemistry teacher’s knowledge about models and modelling. Research in Science Education, 35, 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, E., Gullberg, A., Attorps, I., Thorén, I., & Tärneberg, R. (2011). Prospective teachers’ initial conceptions about pupils’ difficulties in science and mathematics: A potential resource in teacher education. International Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 9, 843–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. R., & Bradbury, L. U. (2009). Mentoring in support of science teaching. In A. Collins & N. Gillespie (Eds.), The continuum of secondary science teacher preparation: Knowledge, questions, and research recommendations (pp. 171–185). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. R., Bradbury, L. U., Glynn, S. M., & Deaton, C. M. (2008). Conceptions of science teacher mentoring and mentoring practice in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, T., & Lopez-Real, F. (2005). Mentors’ perceptions of their roles in mentoring student teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitmate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2014). Developing understandings of practice: Science teacher learning. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 811–829). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Firestone, J. B., Wong, S. S., Ortega, I., Adams, K., & Bang, E. (2011). Beginning secondary science teacher induction: A two-year mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1199–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, T. C. (1997). Assisted performance and teacher preparation in an urban school. Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Fox, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 171–193). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2008). Computer, craft, complexity, change: Explorations into science teacher knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 44, 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P. J., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2005). Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 679–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 922–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2014). Learning to teach science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 871–888). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. (2008). Mentoring new mentors: Learning to mentor preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (2007). Negotiating power and pedagogy in student teaching: Expanding and shifting roles in expert–novice discourse. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail Lowery, N. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 86, 572–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Fulton, L. A. (2012). Mentor–novice relationships and learning to teach in teacher induction: A critical review of the research. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2, 56–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 481–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weasmer, J., & Woods, A. M. (2003). The role of the host teacher in the student teaching experience. The Clearinghouse Journal, 76, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science eaching, 39, 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation’s Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Award 0934839.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Barnett.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnett, E., Friedrichsen, P.J. Educative Mentoring: How a Mentor Supported a Preservice Biology Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development. J Sci Teacher Educ 26, 647–668 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9442-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9442-3

Keywords

Navigation