Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 445–464 | Cite as

Teacher Training and Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Science Teaching

  • Chantal VelthuisEmail author
  • Petra Fisser
  • Jules Pieters
Elementary Science Teacher Education


This study focuses on the improvement of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching science by including science courses within the teacher training program. Knowing how efficacy beliefs change over time and what factors influence the development by pre-service primary teachers of positive science teaching efficacy beliefs may be useful for teacher training universities, so that they can adapt their curriculum to accommodate these factors. Participants included 292 pre-service primary teachers, a cross-sectional sample from two different universities in the Netherlands across the four different years of study in the training program. Based upon our results, we conclude that the science teaching self-efficacy of pre-service teachers, in particular, improved during years 1 and 2, and not during years 3 and 4. Higher levels of self-rated subject-matter knowledge and science teaching experience in primary schools both contributed to higher levels of personal self-efficacy for science teaching. Differences at the university level in courses taken during the first year between science content courses and science methods courses also influenced the pre-service teachers’ development of science teaching self-efficacy. After their first year, the pre-service teachers from the university with science content courses had significantly higher self-efficacy than pre-service teachers from the university that offered science methods courses. After the second year of teacher training, however, this difference in self-efficacy was no longer present.


Teacher education Pre-service primary teachers Self-efficacy Science teaching 


  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Bleicher, R. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in preservice primary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teaching Education, 14(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enochs, L., & Riggs, I. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisser, P., Ormel, B., & Velthuis, C. (2010). Natuur en techniek in het basisonderwijs: hoe bekwaam voelen de leerkrachten zich? [Science in the primary school: what is the science teaching self-efficacy of teachers?] . Paper presented during the Onderwijs Research Dagen, 23–25 june 2010. Enschede.Google Scholar
  9. Jarvis, T., & Pell, T. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 1787–1811.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Science Report. Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade. Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  11. Meelissen, M., & Drent, M. (2008). TIMSS-2007 Nederland: Leerprestaties in exacte vakken in het basisonderwijs [TIMSS-2007 the Netherlands: Science learning in primary schools]. Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, J. J., & Watson, S. B. (1999). Contributors to the decision of elementary education majors to choose science as an academic concentration. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bookout, V. (2002). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on preservice teachers’attitudes toward self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Platform Bèta Techniek. (2010). Technomonitor 2010. The Hague: Platform Bèta Techniek.Google Scholar
  17. Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M., & Straver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of primary level teachers. Science Education, 80, 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of a primary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rohaan, E., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. (2012). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of a randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Teacher Education, 84(1), 43–50.Google Scholar
  23. Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 192(2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bachelor Teacher TrainingSaxion University of Applied SciencesHengeloThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum Design and Educational Innovation, Faculty of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.SLONational Institute for Curriculum DevelopmentEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations