Skip to main content

Framing Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Dissolving as a Ladder of Explanations

Journal of Science Teacher Education volume 24, pages 1177–1199 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

The paper details an exploratory qualitative study that investigated 61 prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding of dissolving salt and sugar in water respectively. The study was set within a 15-week elementary science methods course that included a 5E learning cycle lesson on dissolving, the instructional context. Oversby’s (Prim Sci Rev 63:6–19, 2002, Aspects of teaching secondary science, Routledge Falmer, London, 2002) ladder of explanations for the context of dissolving, current scientific explanations for dissolving and perspectives on conceptions and misconceptions provided the unified framework for the study. Concept maps, interview transcripts, written artifacts, and drawings and narratives were used as data to investigate these prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding of dissolving throughout the 15-weeks of the methods course. Analysis revealed that participants’ explanations of dissolving were predominantly descriptive explanations (39 %) and interpretative explanations (38 %), with lower percentage occurrences of intentional (14 %) and cause and effect (9 %) level explanations. Most of these explanations were also constructed by a set of loosely connected and reinforcing everyday concepts abstracted from common everyday experiences making them misconceptions. Implications include: (1) the need for science teacher educators to use multiple platforms to derive their prospective elementary teachers’ conceptual understandings of science content; and (2) to identify and help them identify their own scientific conceptions and misconceptions and how they influence the construction of scientific/nonscientific explanations. Science teacher educators also need to emphasize the role of meaningful frameworks associated with the concept that is being introduced during the Engage phase of the 5E learning cycle. This is important because, relevant prior knowledge is associated with the knowledge of the particle theory of matter and both are part of larger knowledge system comprised of interrelated scientific concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abell, C. F. H., DeBoer, G. E. (2008). An analysis of field test results for assessment items aligned to the middle school topic of atoms, molecules, and states of matter. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD, 3/30-4/2/2008.

  • Akgün, A. (2009). The relation between science student teachers’ misconceptions about solution, dissolution, diffusion and their attitudes toward science with their achievement. Education and Science, 34(154), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of Grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primary teachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. S. & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Introduction. In M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford, (Eds.), How students learn science: Science in the classroom. Committee on how people learn, a targeted report for teachers (pp. 1–28). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Ebenezer, J. V. (2001). A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: Animation of the solution process of table salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., & Fraser, D. M. (2001). First year chemical engineering students’ conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction. Science Education, 85, 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1001–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldston, M. J., Day, J. B., Sundberg, C., & Dantzler, J. (2010). Psychometric analysis of a 5E learning cycle lesson plan assessment instrument. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 633–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabapinar, F., Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2004). The design and evaluation of a teaching-learning sequence addressing the solubility concept with Turkish secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, P. (2012). Misunderstanding misconceptions. Science Scope, 38(5), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesseler, J., & Galvan, P. (2006). Dissolving is the solution. Science and Children, 43(5), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikas, E. (2001). Children’s understanding of dissolving: The influence of visibility of the process. Implications for teaching. In N. Valanides, (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1st JOSTE Symposium in Southern Europe-Science and technology education: Preparing future citizens. Vol I (pp. 456). Section 1: Relevant teaching incorporating curriculum, teaching approaches and assessment aspects. Section 2: Environmental issues including sustainable development and a culture of peace. Nicosia, Cyprus: Imprinta (2001).

  • Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 432–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ Misconceptions About Basic Chemical Ideas (2nd ed.). A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry, London, United Kingdom. Retrieved from Royal Society of Chemistry website: www.rsc.org/images/Misconceptions_update_tcm18-188603.pdf.

  • Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2007). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (3rd ed.). London, England: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., & Merritt, J. (2012). Engaging students in scientific practices: What does constructing and revising models look like in the science classroom? Science and Children, 49(7), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, L., Mendoza, J., & Borsese, A. (2007). Teachers‘and prospective teachers‘explanations of liquid-state phenomena: A comparative study involving three European Countries. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Ebenezer, J. V. (2002). Descriptive categories and structural characteristics of students’ conceptions: An exploration of relations. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 1120–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W.-H., & Lin, M.-S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 344–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longden, K. (1991). Children’s interpretation of dissolving. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Press Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman, J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oversby, J. P. (2000). Good explanations for dissolving. Primary Science Review, 63, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oversby, J. P. (2002). Assessing conceptual understanding. In S. Amos & R. Boohan (Eds.), Aspects of teaching secondary science (pp. 148–165). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, P. M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-drive assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 265–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J., & Goldston, M. J. D. (2007). Prognosis for science misconceptions research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, K. (2013). Minority pre-service teachers' conceptions of teaching science: Sources of science teaching strategies. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 687–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, K., Harrell, P., & Wojnowski, D. (2013). Analyzing prospective teachers' images of scientists using positive, negative and stereotypical images of scientists. Research in Science and Technological Education, 31(1), 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2007). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemical Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Garderen, D., Hanuscin, D., Lee, E., & Kohn, P. (2012). QUEST: A collaborative professional development model to meet the needs of diverse learners in K-6 science. Psychology in Schools, 49(5), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #310740, Denton, TX, 76203-5017, USA

    Karthigeyan Subramaniam & Pamela Esprivalo Harrell

Authors
  1. Karthigeyan Subramaniam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Esprivalo Harrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karthigeyan Subramaniam.

About this article

Cite this article

Subramaniam, K., Esprivalo Harrell, P. Framing Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Dissolving as a Ladder of Explanations. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 1177–1199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9356-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9356-x

Keywords

  • Conceptions
  • Explanations
  • Dissolving
  • Misconceptions