Skip to main content

Professional Journals as a Source of PCK for Teaching Nature of Science: An Examination of Articles Published in The Science Teacher (TST) (an NSTA Journal), 1995–2010

Journal of Science Teacher Education volume 24, pages 977–997 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

A number of science education policy documents recommend that students develop an understanding of the enterprise of science and the nature of science (NOS). Despite this emphasis, there is still a gap between policy and practice. Teacher professional literature provides one potential venue for bridging this gap, by providing “activities that work” (Appleton in elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2006) that can scaffold teachers’ developing pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching NOS. We analyzed articles published in the NSTA journal The Science Teacher (1995–2010) in terms of the degree to which they provide appropriate model activities and specific information that can support the development of teachers’ PCK for teaching NOS. Our analysis revealed a diversity of NOS aspects addressed by the authors and a wide range of variation in the percent of articles focused on each aspect. Additionally, we found that few articles provided robust information related to all the component knowledge bases of PCK for NOS. In particular, within the extant practitioner literature, there are few models for teaching the aspects of NOS, such as the function and nature of scientific theory. Furthermore, though articles provided information relevant to informing teachers’ knowledge of instructional strategies for NOS, relevant information to inform teachers’ knowledge of assessment in this regard was lacking. We provide recommendations for ways in which the practitioner literature may support teachers’ teaching of NOS through more robust attention to the types of knowledge research indicates are needed in order to teaching NOS effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but…. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. doi:10.1002/tea.20226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Early childhood teachers’ views of nature of science: The influence of intellectual levels, cultural values, and explicit reflective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 748–770. doi:10.1002/tea.20236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2010). Experienced teachers’ strategies for assessing nature of science conceptions in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(6), 723–745. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9208-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. doi:10.1002/tea.20132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1990). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narrative of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Friedrichsen, P. (2006). JELL-O and detergents: A successful inquiry recipe. The Science Teacher, 73(5), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (2004). Quizing students on the myths of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2004). Nature of science the always part of the science story. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (1998). The card activity: Introducing teachers to the philosophy of science. In McComas W. (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 73–82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

  • Colburn, A. (1997). How to make lab activities more open-ended. California Science Teachers Association Journal, Fall issue, 4–6.

  • Colburn, A. (2004). Focusing labs on the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, A., & Clough, M. (1997). Implementing the learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 64(5), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2007). Unlocking the atom. The Science Teacher, 72(4), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Densmore, M., Kolecki, J. C., Miller, A., Petersen, R., & Terrell, M. (2005). Science through ARts (STAR). The Science Teacher, 72(2), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirnberger, J. M., McCullagh, S., & Howick, T. (2005). Writing & Drawing in the Naturalist’s Journal: Reviving the tradition of the Naturalist’s Journal as an effective learning tool. The Science Teacher, 72(1), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young peoples’ images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC). 2005. Foundation science: A comprehensive curriculum. Center for Science Education at EDC. http://cse.edc.org/curriculum/foundationscience/default.asp.

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkema, J., Jadrich, J., & Bruxvoort, C. (2009). Science and engineering. The Science Teacher, 76(9), 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, W. (2004). An activity model for scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, A., & Townsend, J. S. (2004). Models that matter. The Science Teacher, 71(3), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubenthal, M., Braile, L., & Taber, J. (2008). Redefining earthquakes and the earthquake machine. The Science Teacher, 75(1), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, S. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Mind the gap: Looking for evidence-based practice of science literacy for all in science teaching journals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 559–577. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9271-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S., Scharman, L. C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89(2), 314–334. doi:10.1002/sce.20053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, A. (2008). Weaving the story of science. The Science Teacher, 75(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, C. M. (2006). Challenges and strategies for effectively teaching the nature of science: A qualitative case study. An unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Connectuit.

  • Lederman, N. G. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The constructs and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matkins, J. J., Bell, R., Irving, K., & McNall, R. (2002). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED465615).

  • Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (1998). The principle elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2004). The nature of science: Always part of the science story. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). International science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J., & Glasson, G. (2003). Connecting biotechnology and society. The Science Teacher, 70(4), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, E., & Bell, R. L. (2003). The nature of science and perceptual frameworks: Emphasizing a more balanced approach to science instruction. The Science Teacher, 70(8), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narguizian, P. (2004). Understanding the nature of science through evolution. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (2007). Member Journals. Retrieved February 6, 2013, from http://www.nsta.org/publications/journals.aspx.

  • National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (2000, July). NSTA position statement on the nature of science. Retrieved March 30, 2011, from http://www.nsta.org/159&psid=22.

  • Osborne, J. F., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the ‘expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, R. H., & Sterling, D. R. (2003). Team science: Students from different disciplines come together for a science project. The Science Teacher, 70(4), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, G. (2009). A new twist on “mystery boxes”. The Science Teacher, 76(8), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, C., Chessin, D., & Chambless, M. (2007). Nurturing the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 74(8), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubba, P., & Anderson, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). It’s the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. doi:10.1002/sce.10128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. (2008). A multi-year program developing an explicit reflective pedagogy for teaching pre-service teachers the nature of science by ostention. Science & Education, 17(2), 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1989). Teachers’ views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teach. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staver, J. R. (2003). Evolution and intelligent design. The Science Teacher, 70(8), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, J. (2004). I lost the answer key: Authentic science flourishes when a teacher loses the prepared answer key. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

    Sevgi Aydın

  2. Bülent Ecevit University, Kdz. Ereğli, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Betül Demirdöğen

  3. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Nilay Muslu & Deborah L. Hanuscin

Authors
  1. Sevgi Aydın
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Betül Demirdöğen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nilay Muslu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deborah L. Hanuscin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevgi Aydın.

About this article

Cite this article

Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Muslu, N. et al. Professional Journals as a Source of PCK for Teaching Nature of Science: An Examination of Articles Published in The Science Teacher (TST) (an NSTA Journal), 1995–2010. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 977–997 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9345-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9345-0

Keywords

  • Nature of science
  • Pedagogical content knowledge
  • Secondary science education
  • Professional journals