Abstract
This study explored the nature of the relationship between a fifth-grade teacher and an informal science educator as they planned and implemented a life science unit in the classroom, and sought to define this relationship in order to gain insight into the roles of each educator. In addition, student learning as a result of instruction was assessed. Prior research has predominately examined relationships and roles of groups of teachers and informal educators in the museum setting (Tal et al. in Sci Educ 89:920–935, 2005; Tal and Steiner in Can J Sci Math Technol Educ 6:25–46, 2006; Tran 2007). The current study utilized case study methodology to examine one relationship (between two educators) in more depth and in a different setting—an elementary classroom. The relationship was defined through a framework of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration (Buck 1998; Intriligator 1986, 1992) containing eight dimensions. Findings suggest a relationship of coordination, which requires moderate commitment, risk, negotiation, and involvement, and examined the roles that each educator played and how they negotiated these roles. Consistent with previous examinations in science education of educator roles, the informal educator’s role was to provide the students with expertise and resources not readily available to them. The roles played by the classroom teacher included classroom management, making connections to classroom activities and curricula, and clarifying concepts. Both educators’ perceptions suggested they were at ease with their roles and that they felt these roles were critical to the optimization of the short time frames (1 h) the informal educator was in the classroom. Pre and posttest tests demonstrated students learned as a result of the programs.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Akerson, V., Cullen, T., & Hanson, D. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113.
Anderson, D., Lucas, K., Ginns, I., & Dierking, L. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84, 658–679.
Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. Abell & L. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–535). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bevan, B., & Dillon, J. (2010). Broadening views of learning: Developing educators for the 21st century through an international research partnership at the Exploratorium and King’s College London. The New Educator, 6, 167–180.
Buck, G. (1998). Collaboration between science teacher educators and science faculty from Arts and Sciences for the purpose of developing a middle childhood science teacher education program: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH. UMI #: 9842486, UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, MI.
Bybee, R. (2001). Achieving scientific literacy: Strategies for insuring that free-choice science education complement national formal science education efforts. In J. H. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 44–64). New York: Teachers College Press.
Callahan, J., & Martin, D. (2007). The spectrum of school-university partnerships: A typology of organizational learning systems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 136–145.
Cox-Peterson, A., Marsh, D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. (2003). Invetigation of guided school tours, students learning and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200–218.
Falk, J., & Adelman, L. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest in aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176.
Faria, C., & Chagas, I. (2012). Investigating school-guided trips to an aquarium: What roles for science teachers? International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 1, 1–16.
Frankel, D. (2001). The free-choice education sector as a sleeping giant in the public policy debate. In J. H. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 163–173). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gupta, P., Adams, J., Kisiel, J., & DeWitt, J. (2010). Examining the complexities of school-museum partnerships. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 685–699.
Intriligator, B. (1986). Collaborating with the schools: A strategy for school improvement. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
Intriligator, B. (1992). Establishing interorganizational structures that facilitate successful school partnerships. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
Kang, C., Anderson, D., & Wu, X. (2009). Chinese perceptions of the interface between school and museum education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 665–684.
Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.
Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94, 95–121.
Luke, J., Camp, B., Dierking, L., & Pearce, U. (2001). The first free-choice science learning conference: From issues to future directions. In J. H. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 151–162). New York: Teachers College Press.
Meehan, M., Wiersma, W., & Riffle, J. (2002). Collaborative partnerships between educational organizations: Extent of independence-interdependence and satisfaction with collaboration. Charleston, WV: Report for AEL.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering and mathematics education system. Retrieved on August 15, 2012 from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2007/stem_action.pdf.
National Science Teachers Association. (1999). http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/informal.aspx, retrieved August 16, 2012.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1991). The measurement of students’ attitudes toward scientific field trips. Science Education, 75(5), 513–523.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rennie, L. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. Abell & L. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rennie, L., & McClafferty, T. (1995). Using visits to science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 175–185.
Smith-Sebasto, N., & Cavern, L. (2006). Effects of pre- and posttrip activities associated with a residential environmental education experience on students’ attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(4), 3–17.
Tal, T., Bamberger, Y., & Morag, O. (2005). Guided school visits to natural history museums in Israel: Teachers’ roles. Science Education, 89, 920–935.
Tal, T., & Steiner, L. (2006). Patterns of teacher-museum staff relationships: School visits to the educational centre of a science museum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(1), 25–46.
Tran, L. (2007). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91, 278–297.
Tran, L., & King, H. (2007). The professionalization of museum educators: The case in science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(2), 131–149.
Tunicliffe, S. (1997). Yet another missed opportunity? Primary schools visits to natural history museum. Journal of Education in Museums, 18, 20–23.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Designs and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Gayle Buck, Dr. Alan Ewert, and Dr. Vicky Meretsky of Indiana University for their support of and feedback on the dissertation work that served as the basis of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
About this article
Cite this article
Weiland, I.S., Akerson, V.L. Toward Understanding the Nature of a Partnership Between an Elementary Classroom Teacher and an Informal Science Educator. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 1333–1355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9343-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9343-2