Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Self-Efficacy in Elementary Science Teaching With Professional Learning Communities

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Emerging from Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, this study of in-service elementary school teachers examined the effects of sustained Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) on self-efficacy in science teaching. Based on mixed research methods, and a non-equivalent control group experimental design, the investigation explored changes in personal self-efficacy and outcome expectancy among teachers engaged in PLCs that featured Demonstration Laboratories, Lesson Study, and annual Summer Institutes. Significant changes favoring the experimental group were found on all quantitative measures of self-efficacy. Structured clinical interviews revealed that observed changes were largely attributable to a wide range of direct (mastery) and vicarious experiences, as well as emotional reinforcement and social persuasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. Grand Valley and Mountain View are pseudonyms for two public school districts located in Northern California.

  2. All teacher names are pseudonymous. Grade level and years of experience are designated in parentheses, e.g. Lynn (4th, 11 years).

References

  • Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilica, K. (2007). Taking action in elementary science teaching: A reflection on four teachers’ collaborative research journey. Networks, An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 9(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, R. (2007). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 841–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, T. (2010). STEM teachers in professional learning communities: A knowledge synthesis. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (1996). Influence of a cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy. Science Education, 80, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, N. (2009). Pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching: Does service learning make a difference? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (1983). The elementary level science methods course: Breeding ground of an apprehension toward science? A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 745–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, L., Scharmann, L., & Riggs, I. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to pre-service elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, K., & Britton, T. (2011). STEM teachers in professional learning communities: From good teachers to great teaching. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2001). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamos, J., Bergin, K., et al. (2009). Opening the classroom door: Professional learning communities in the math and science partnership program. Science Educator, 18(2), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, R. (2011). Changes in preservice elementary teachers personal science teaching efficacy and science teaching outcome expectancies: The influence of context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K. (2002). Lesson study: Can Japanese methods translate to U.S. schools. Harvard Education Letter, 18(3), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B., et al. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., & Richardson, G. (2009). Enhancing prospective teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs through scaffolded, student-directed inquiry. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. J., Jack, B., & Chiu, H. L. (2003). Taiwan elementary science teachers’ views of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsely, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., et al. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, B., & Heaston, T. (2011). Early science teaching experiences in a campus-based hands-on lab increases confidence ands capacity of undergraduates for teaching science. Background research paper no. 14, National Study of Education in Undergraduate Science (www.nseus.org).

  • McDonnough, J., & Matkins, J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McREL. (2003). Sustaining school improvement: Professional learning community. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullholland, J., Dorman, J., & Odgers, B. (2004). Assessment of science teaching efficacy of preservice teachers in an Australian university. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata, A., & Takahashi, A. (2002). Vehicle to connect theory, research and practice: How teacher thinking changes in district-level lesson study in Japan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics, Athens, GA, October 26–29 [ED 471 780].

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puchner, L., & Taylor, A. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. G. (1986). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(1), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, I. (1988). The development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

  • Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. R. (2010). Lesson study: Professional development and its impact on science teacher self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY.

  • Schoone, K., & Boone, W. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preserice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrigley, R. (1974). The attitude of preservice elementary teachers toward science. School Science and Mathematics, 74, 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald, T. (2009). The relationship between lesson study and self-efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 109(8), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolleck, L., Zembal-Saul, C., & Yoder, E. (2006). The development and validation of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in regard to the teaching of science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilger, P. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J., & Ginns, I. (1995). Origins of, and changes in preservice teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA, April 21–25 [ED 383 570].

  • Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S., & Pedretti, E., et al. (2006). Exploring the use of cases and case methods in influencing elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the California Post-secondary Education Commission through the Improving Teacher Quality Program (Title II, Part A), U.S. Department of Education. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel J. Mintzes.

About this article

Cite this article

Mintzes, J.J., Marcum, B., Messerschmidt-Yates, C. et al. Enhancing Self-Efficacy in Elementary Science Teaching With Professional Learning Communities. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 1201–1218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9320-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9320-1

Keywords

Navigation