This study has investigated the use of an open guided inquiry laboratory course in which a group of pre-service teachers planned and implemented practical work for school purposes. A total of 32 pre-service teachers (physics, mathematics, and chemistry majors) participated in the study. Each participant wrote a reflective essay after completing the course, and three pre-service teachers were interviewed four times during the course. The results show that the use of an open guided inquiry environment provides support for pre-service teachers to discover the limits of their understanding of subject matter knowledge, allowing them to construct knowledge in a different kind of environment from any they had possessed previously, and helping them to understand the possibilities of practical work in teaching. In the course of developing their competence in these aspects, pre-service teachers also gain an understanding of various aspects of teachers’ knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673–699.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What teachers say about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351–372.
Chatterjee, S., Williamson, V. M., McCann, K., & Peck, M. L. (2009). Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1427–1432.
Cheung, D. (2008). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107–130.
Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.
Danielsson, A. T., & Linder, C. (2009). Learning in physics by doing laboratory work: towards a new conceptual framework. Gender and Education, 21(2), 129–144.
De Jong, O., & Van Der Valk, A. E. (2007). Science teachers’ PCK and teaching practice: learning to scaffold students’ open-inquiry learning. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from Science Education Research (pp. 107–118). Dordrecht: Springer.
Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Chemical Education Research, 76(4), 543–547.
Duran, L. B., McArthur, J., & Van Hook, S. (2004). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 155–171.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing, the art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 361–376). California: Sage.
France, B., & Haigh, M. (2009). The pedagogy of practical work. In S. Ritchie (Ed.), The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in Australasia (pp. 217–234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Halloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.
Harris, K., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.acds.edu.au/docs/teachsci.pdf.
Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Lab work. SET: Research information for teachers, number one. Canberra: Australian council for education research.
Hirvonen, P. E., & Viiri, J. (2002). Physics student teachers’ ideas about the objectives of practical work. Science & Education, 11, 305–316.
Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755–760.
Johnston, A. (2008). Demythologizing or dehumanizing? A response to settlage and the ideals of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(1), 11–13.
Jones, A., Simon, S., Black, P., Fairbrother, R., & Watson, J. R. (1992). Open work in science: Development of investigations in schools. Hatfield, England: Association for Science Education.
Kansanen, P. (2009). The curious affair of pedagogical content knowledge. Orbis Scholae, 3(2), 5–18.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2001). Linking practice and theory. The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kurki-Suonio, K. (2011). Principles supporting the perceptional teaching of physics: A “practical teaching philosophy”. Science & Education, 20, 211–243.
Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V., & Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil Interest in physics: A survey in Finland. Nordina, 1(2), 72–85.
Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–60.
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 38(3), 1–24.
McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Constantinou, C. P. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry. Physics Education, 35(6), 411–416.
Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and reflection: Preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 477–494.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, A. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2010). Preservice and inservice teachers' challenges in the planning of practical work in physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 393–409.
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160.
Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 461–467.
Shakedi, A., & Laron, D. (2004). Between idealism and pragmatism: a case study of student teachers’ pedagogical development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(7), 693–711.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219–228.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tillema, H. H. (1998). Stability and change in student teachers’ beliefs about teaching. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 4(2), 217–228.
van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
Van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572–590.
Varma, T., Volkmann, M., & Hanuscin, D. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1–22.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461.
Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63–89.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941–967.
About this article
Cite this article
Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M.A. & Hirvonen, P.E. Open Guided Inquiry Laboratory in Physics Teacher Education. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 449–474 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9316-x
- Physics teacher education
- Teacher knowledge
- Practical work
- Open guided inquiry