Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 601–620 | Cite as

Reflections on Discourse Practices During Professional Development on the Learning Cycle

  • Clare Valerie BellEmail author
  • Arthur Louis Odom
Article

Abstract

While much is known about K-12 teachers’ participation in professional development (PD) on inquiry-based science instruction, how professors facilitate such PD is not as well documented. This reflective, descriptive study documents the pedagogical practices of three professors during a two-week summer PD program on inquiry-based science instruction. Twenty teachers of fourth- through ninth-grade students in a Midwestern city engaged in lessons based on the learning cycle (Lawson in Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, Lawson 1995). Data sources included video-recorded observations with transcripts, video-recorded post-observation interviews with transcripts, and audio-recorded follow-up interviews with transcripts. Data were analyzed to create descriptive narratives around excerpts of discourse from PD sessions and interviews. Analyses indicated that implementation of the learning cycle lessons varied among the professors. These findings led to further questions concerning the professors’ beliefs about the learning cycle and the ways that teachers were positioned as learners during PD.

Keywords

Discourse Inquiry Learning cycle Professional development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the professors who graciously agreed to participate in the study in order to investigate their implementation of the PD program. Such detailed investigation into teaching practice does not occur frequently in higher education and could be considered threatening. We appreciate the openness and trust displayed by our PD collaborators while sharing their thoughts.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bianchini, J. A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). A history of ideas in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1976/1999). Power as knowledge. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (pp. 475–480). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. French, D. P. (2005). Was inquiry a mistake? Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 60–62.Google Scholar
  8. García, O., & Torres-Guevara, R. (2010). Monoglossic ideologies and language policies in the education of U.S. Latinas/os. In E. G. Murillo Jr., S. A. Villenas, R. T. Galván, J. Sánchez Muñoz, C. Martínez, & M. Machado-Casas (Eds.), Handbook of Latinos and education: Theory, research & practice (pp. 182–193). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.Google Scholar
  10. Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  12. Leonard, W. H., & Penick, J. E. (2009). Is the inquiry real? The Science Teacher, 76(5), 40–43.Google Scholar
  13. Maybin, J. (2001). Language, struggle, and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 64–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
  16. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Oliveira, A. (2010). Developing elementary teachers’ understandings of hedges and personal pronouns in inquiry-based science classroom discourse. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 103–126. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9157-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, Y., Weizman, A., Fortus, D., Sutherland, L., Merrit, J., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Talking science. The Science Teacher, 76(5), 44–47.Google Scholar
  20. Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89(6), 879–900. doi: 10.1002/sce.20081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Von Secker, C. E., & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1110–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109–130. doi: 10.1002/sce.20290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, R. F. (2008). Chapter one: What is discursive practice? Language Learning, 58(2), 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of Missouri—Kansas CityKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations