Introducing Future Teachers to Science Beyond the Classroom
- 945 Downloads
Informal science education institutions (ISEIs), such as museums, aquariums, and nature centers, offer more to teachers than just field trip destinations—they have the potential to provide ideas for pedagogy, as well as support deeper development of teachers’ science knowledge. Although there is extensive literature related to teacher/museum interactions within the context of the school field trip, there is limited research that examines other ways that such institutions might support classroom teachers. A growing number of studies, however, examine how incorporating such ideas of connections of ISEIs to pre-service teacher education might improve teacher perceptions and awareness. Pre-service elementary teachers enrolled in a science methods class participated in a semester-long assignment which required participation in their choice of activities and events (workshops, field trips, family day activities) conducted at local ISEIs. Students generally saw this embedded assignment as beneficial, despite the additional out-of-class time required for completion. Comparison of pre-/post-class responses suggested that teachers shifted their perceptions of ISEIs as first and foremost as places for field trips or hands-on experiences, to institutions that can help teachers with classroom science instruction. Although basic awareness of the existence of such opportunities was frequently cited, teachers also recognized these sites as places that could enhance their teaching, either by providing materials/resources for the classroom or by helping them learn (content and pedagogy) as teachers. Implications for practice, including the role of ISEIs in teacher preparation and indication, are also discussed.
KeywordsPre-service teachers Informal science Museum Field trip Teacher beliefs
- Bevan, B., & Semper, R. J. (2006). Mapping informal science institutions onto the science education landscape. Center for Informal Learning and Schools. Retrieved from http://cils.exploratorium.edu/resource_shared/downloads/4229/Mapping%20Informal%20Science%20Instituions%20onto%20the%20Science%20Eductaion%20Landscape.pdf.
- Bodilly, S., & Beckett, M. K. (2005). Making out-of-school-time matter: Evidence for an action agenda. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Dorph, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., Harty, A., & McCaffrey, T. (2011). High hopes-few opportunities: The status of elementary science education in California. Sacramento, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd.Google Scholar
- Griffin, J. (2010). Embedded learning and teaching inside and outside the classroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- Institute of Museum and Library Services. (2005). Charting the landscape, mapping new paths: Museums, libraries, and K-12 learning. Washington, DC: IMLS.Google Scholar
- Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.Google Scholar
- Kisiel, J. (2011). Why so hard? Gaining insights from schoolteachers and informal science education staff regarding teacher use of ISE resources. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2004). Listening in on museum conversations. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Board of Science Education, Center for Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering and mathematics education system. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2007/stem_action.pdf.
- Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 301–332.Google Scholar
- Patrick, H., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Conceptual change in teachers’ intuitive conception of learning, motivation, and instruction: The role of motivational and epistemological beliefs. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 117–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S., & Noam, G. (2007). Commissioned paper for the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Learning Science in informal environments, Washington, DC. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Schwartz_abd_Noam_Commissioned_Paper.pdf.
- Strauss, S. (2001). Folk psychology, folk pedagogy, and their relations to subject-matter knowledge. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.Google Scholar