Abstract
US educators express concern that students are turning away from the study of science and have little interest in pursuing science careers. Nationally, science achievement scores for 8th graders are unchanged since 1996, but 12th graders’ scores have significantly decreased. A shortcoming of education reform efforts is lack of attention to students’ developmental needs. Science study should enable students to learn about themselves—to develop and refine their skills, define their values, explore personal interests, and understand the importance of science to themselves and others. Effective secondary science instruction requires attention to students’ identity development—the key developmental task of adolescence. Secondary science teachers participated in an 8-week course focused on understanding adolescent identity development and methods for addressing identity. Transcripts of the teachers’ online discussions of salient issues were analyzed to determine their perceptions regarding classroom identity work. Teachers identified several assets and obstacles to identity work that were organized into two broad categories: teacher knowledge, training opportunities, and administrative support, or lack of these; and, presence of inflexible curricula, standardized testing regimes, and increased teacher accountability. Implications for student growth and science teacher professional development are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Recent changes to the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) means that data from the 2009 science assessment cannot be compared to results from the previous years.
References
Bohrnsted, G. W. (1997). US mathematics and science achievement: How are we doing? Teachers College Record, 99(1), 19–28.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Introduction to the common core standards. Retrieved online July 12, 2011 from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol. 23, pp. 43–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
Eccles, J., Lord, S., Roeser, R., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1997). The association of school transitions in early adolescence with developmental trajectories through high school. In J. Schulenberg, J. I. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence (pp. 283–321). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
Faircloth, B. S. (2009). Making the most of adolescence: Harnessing the search for identity to understand classroom belonging. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(3), 321–348.
Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2009). Motivation and identity: The relations of action and development in educational contexts: An introduction to the Special Issue. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 73–77.
Kitts, K. (2009). The paradox of middle and high school students’ attitudes toward science versus their attitudes about science as a career. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57, 159–164.
Kroger, J. K. (2000). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
LaGuardia, J. G. (2009). Developing who I am: A self-determination theory approach to the establishment of healthy identities. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 90–104.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sabge.
Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 582–590.
Miller, K. (2003, November). School, teacher, and leadership impacts on student achievement. McREL Policy Brief. Retrieved online October 10, 2011 from http://www.mcrel.org/pdf/policybriefs/5032pi_pbschoolteacherleaderbrief.pdf.
National Academies of Science. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2005). Science achievement. Retrieved online August 7, 2009 from http://nationsreportcard.gov/science_2005/s0102.asp. Washington, DC: Author.
National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it’s too late. Washington, D.C.: Author.
National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved online November 30, 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/edu_com/draft_stem_report.pdf.
Olitisky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 33–56.
Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 12, 495–510.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves compel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188–204.
Reveles, J. M., & Brown, B. A. (2008). Contextual shifting: Teachers emphasizing students’ academic identity to promote scientific literacy. Science Education, 92(6), 1015–1041.
Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in self-awareness: Self, motivation, and self–regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 119–136.
Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550–558.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford.
Smith, M C. (2008). Identity action theory: Principles for classroom instruction. Unpublished manuscript. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
Smith, M C., & Shumow, L. (2011). Improving secondary teachers’ knowledge of adolescent development through teens’ self-documentaries. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 15(2), 45–55.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrant, M. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11(1), 110–123.
Was, C. A., Al-Harthy, I., Stack-Oden, M., & Isaacson, R. M. (2009). Academic identity status and the relationship to achievement goal orientation. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 627–652.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motivation to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
Zollman, A. Smith, M C., & Reisdorf, P. (2011). Identity development: Critical component for learning in mathematics. In D. J. Brahier & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics. Seventy-third yearbook (pp. 41–53). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, M.C., Darfler, A. An Exploration of Teachers’ Efforts to Understand Identity Work and its Relevance to Science Instruction. J Sci Teacher Educ 23, 347–365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9281-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9281-4