Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimenter Confirmation Bias and the Correction of Science Misconceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

This paper describes a randomised educational experiment (n = 47) that examined two different teaching methods and compared their effectiveness at correcting one science misconception using a sample of trainee primary school teachers. The treatment was designed to promote engagement with the scientific concept by eliciting emotional responses from learners that were triggered by their own confirmation biases. The treatment group showed superior learning gains to control at post-test immediately after the lesson, although benefits had dissipated after 6 weeks. Findings are discussed with reference to the conceptual change paradigm and to the importance of feeling emotion during a learning experience, having implications for the teaching of pedagogies to adults that have been previously shown to be successful with children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since the ‘cold’ water in both beakers was actually at the same temperature as the surrounding air, and in order for heat to move there must be a differential in temperature, there was no net heat loss/gain from either beaker. The wool lagging did not make any difference because heat was not being transferred in either case.

  2. Accepted theory states that when the action of air resistance is negligible (as it was with the two balls used in the current study), objects of different mass are observed to undergo the same acceleration due to gravity and so will be appearing to freefall at equivalent speed.

  3. Postgraduate certificate in education.

  4. Taken by year 9 pupils (aged 13–14) in England.

  5. Taken by year 11 pupils (aged 15–16) in England.

  6. Cognitive ability test standard age score.

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P. (1992). The CASE results: Implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2005). Encouraging pupil error may promote better understanding of a scientific concept. School Science Review, 86, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2006). The phenomenon of expectation-related observation: An exploration of nature, associations and causes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, Uxbridge.

  • Allen, M. (2007). Allowing biased experimenting leads to improved pupil learning: A useful paradox. School Science Review, 88, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2010). Learner error, affectual stimulation, and conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 151–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2011). Theory-led confirmation bias and experimental persona. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, S. (2001). Seeking emotional involvement in science education: Food chains and webs. School Science Review, 83, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. N., Wragg, E. C., Carré, C. G., & Carter, D. S. G. (1992). A longitudinal study of primary teachers’ perceived competence in, and concerns about, National Curriculum implementation. Research Papers in Education, 7, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The ‘Greenhouse Effect’: Children’s perceptions of causes, consequences and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromm, B., & Desmedt, J. (1995). Pain and the brain: From nociception to cognition. New York: Raven Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 623–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, H. (2005). Is GCSE science a load of hot air? Science Teacher Education, 44, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1975). The name of the game. School Science Review, 56, 800–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist?. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 67–77). Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F., Mitchell, I. J. & the Monash Children’s Science Group (1988). Two teaching strategies for considering children’s science. In What research says to the teacher: The yearbook of the International Council of Associations of Science Education, pp. 1–12.

  • Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 60, 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, P. T., & Parks, C. (2002). Emotional episodes facilitate word recall. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 685–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, J. J. III. (1987). The costs and benefits of using conceptual change teaching methods: A teacher’s perspective. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 2), pp. 194–209. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Jerusalem, M., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.). (1999). Emotion, motivation and leistung. Gottingen, Bern: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. (1991). Pre-service elementary teachers’ explanations of diurnal, seasonal and lunar phenomena. Hobart: School of Education, University of Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education, 84, 624–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, C., Palacio, D., & Summers, M. (1990). A survey of primary school teachers’ conceptions of force and motion. Educational Research, 32, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, C., & Summers, M. (1989). An investigation of some primary teachers’ understanding of changes in materials. School Science Review, 71, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1979). Psychology of the scientist. Social Studies in Science, 9, 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1993). Some primary school teachers’ understanding of the Earth’s place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8, 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington. (1998). Tutorials in introductory physics. Upper Saddle River, NI: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noce, G., Torosantucci, G., & Vicenti, V. (1988). The floating of objects on the moon: Prediction from a theory or experimental fact? International Journal of Science Education, 10, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, M. E. (1945). Explanations of natural phenomena by adults. Science Education, 29, 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, K., Messer, D., & St. John, K. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers’ views. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigano, D. L., & Richie, S. M. (1995). Student disclosures of fraudulent practice in school laboratories. Research in Science Education, 25, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K., & Law, E. (2003). Children’s ideas about melting and freezing. School Science Review, 85, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1963). Philosophy and scientific realism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Peacock, G. (1992). Tackling contradictions in teachers’ understanding of gravity and air resistance. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (2004). Interactive lecture demonstrations: Active learning in introductory physics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (1992). Research into English teachers’ understanding of the concept of energy. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Targan, D. (1987). A study of conceptual change in the content domain of the lunar phases. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 2), pp. 499–511. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. (1992). Primary science teachers’ understandings of electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C., Raghavan, K., & Sartoris, M. L. (2003). The impact of the MARS curriculum on students’ ability to coordinate theory and evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1247–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK

    Michael Allen & Hilary Coole

Authors
  1. Michael Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hilary Coole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Allen.

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, M., Coole, H. Experimenter Confirmation Bias and the Correction of Science Misconceptions. J Sci Teacher Educ 23, 387–405 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9277-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9277-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation