Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 229–253 | Cite as

Addressing Equity and Diversity with Teachers Though Informal Science Institutions and Teacher Professional Development

Article

Abstract

This study explores how activities developed by science experts in partnership with middle school teachers were employed and interpreted. The goals of this partnership were to (a) help the science teacher meet earth science content standards in new ways, (b) expose students to ‘real world’ experiences outside their school setting, and (c) positively impact teacher practice by providing a program to be used as a catalyst for future learning. Over 300 sixth graders mostly underrepresented science students attended activities at an aquarium serving an urban West Coast urban context. Science teachers, non-science teachers, scientists, and volunteers were all engaged in pre-trip instruction, professional development opportunities, and follow-up activities as this partnership effort explored ways to enhance local literacy initiatives across the curriculum. Results suggest that teacher beliefs about informal education impacted their view and participation in the program and the level of submersion of teachers in collaboration strongly affects the ability to serve underrepresented students on informal excursions. Implications for teacher education and outreach are discussed.

Keywords

Informal science education Equity Museum education Community and school collaborations Marine biology Partnerships Teacher education 

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ash, D. (2008). Thematic continuities: Talking and thinking about adaptation in a socially complex classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2009). Asking scientists: A decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country. Science Education, 93, 131–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 881–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chávez, R. C., & O’Donnell, J. (Eds.). (1998). Speaking the unpleasant: The politics of (non)engagement in the multicultural education terrain. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 81–101). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Falk, J. H. (1983). Field trips: A look at environmental effects on learning. Journal of Biological Education, 17, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 22–28.Google Scholar
  14. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback.Google Scholar
  15. Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning. Curator, 41, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallego, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2005). When the classroom isn’t in school: The construction of scientific knowledge in an after-school setting. In R. K. Yerrick & W. M. Roth’s (Eds.), Establishing scientific discourse communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gennaro, E. D. (1981). The effectiveness of using previsit instructional materials on learning for a museum field trip experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glenn, J. (2000) Before it’s too late. A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.Google Scholar
  21. Griffin, J. (1994). Learning to learn in informal settings. Research in Science Education, 24, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81, 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, P., & McGinnis, J. R. (1999). An informal elementary science education program’s response to the national science education reform movement. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koran, J. J., Morrison, L., Lehman, J., Koran, M. L., & Gandara, L. (1984). Attention and curiosity in museums. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 2(4), 4–17.Google Scholar
  26. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Ladson-Billings, G. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211–248.Google Scholar
  28. Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233–262). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. France: Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orion, N. (1999, April). An holistic approach in making outdoor activities an integral part of the formal learning process in schools. Paper presented at the national association for research in science teaching annual meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1097–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity—One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21.Google Scholar
  37. Rodriguez, A. J. (2006). The multiple faces of agency. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Rodriguez, A. J., Zozakiewicz, C., & Yerrick, R. (2005). Using prompted praxis to improve teacher professional development in culturally diverse schools. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 105, 352–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209–229.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 909–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  44. Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5–8.Google Scholar
  45. The Mendoza Commission. (2000). Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science, engineering, and technology. Report of the congressional commission on the advancement of women and minorities in science, engineering and technology development. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  46. The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author. Retrieved September 1, 2003 from http://www.tc.colimbia.edu/~teachcomm.
  47. Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The filtering effect of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University at BuffaloAmherstUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations