Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 953–970 | Cite as

Can Inquiry and Reflection be Contagious? Science Teachers, Students, and Action Research

  • Kimberly LebakEmail author
  • Ron Tinsley
Article

Abstract

This study reports the transformations of 3 science teachers who conducted action research projects following a model, unique to our graduate program, which follows the theoretical tenets of adult and transformative learning theory. Teachers video their teaching, engage in weekly peer group collaborative reflection sessions, collaborate with students, and consult with other sources to identify goals for improving their teaching practices, develop action plans, and analyze the results of their actions. As a result of this process, all 3 teachers changed their pedagogical approach from a teacher centered textbook driven approach to a student centered inquiry based approach. Implications of using this model as a powerful means of professional development for science teachers are explored.

Keywords

Action research Professional development Reflection Collaboration 

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Association for Science Teacher Education. (2004). ASTE position statement science teacher preparation and career-long development. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://theaste.org/aboutus/AETSPosnStatemt1.htm.
  3. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan, L., & Recesso, A. (2006). Promoting reflection among science student teachers using a web-based video analysis tool. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23, 31–39.Google Scholar
  5. Capobianco, B. M. (2007). A self-study of the role of technology in promoting reflection and inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Lewes, UK: Falmer.Google Scholar
  7. Cranton, P. (2005). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Diez, M., & Blackwell, P. (1999). Achieving the new vision of master’s education for teachers. Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, A. (1999). The role of conversation in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 7, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2002). Action research in science education. ERIC Digest: Clearinghouse for science, mathematics, and environmental education. Retrieved July, 5, 2010, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/action.htm.
  11. Feldman, A., & Minstrell, J. (2000). Action Research as a research methodology for the study of the teaching and learning of science. In E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 429–456). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Fradd, S., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 14–20.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M. G. (1992). Successful school improvement. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gerring, J. (2005). Case study research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 23–153.Google Scholar
  16. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Mertler, C. (2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. National Science Teachers Association. (2006a). Position on scientific inquiry. Retrieved November 28, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/inquiry.aspx.
  22. National Science Teachers Association. (2006b). Position on professional development in science education. Retrieved November 28, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/profdev.aspx.
  23. Sherin, M., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Tabachnick, B., & Zeichner, K. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tinsley, R., & Lebak, K. (2009). Expanding the zone of reflective capacity: Taking separate journeys together. Networks, 11. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://journals.library.wisc.edu/index.php/networks/article/view/190.
  27. Tochon, F. (1999). Video study groups for education, professional development, and change. Madison, WI: Atwood.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, School of EducationPomonaUSA

Personalised recommendations