Abstract
Preservice teachers enrolled in a science content-based course wrote stories that could help their future students understand a science concept. First, participants chose their topic and wrote the story with few guidelines to establish a baseline. In the next part, a different set of students were given a choice of three topics (based on force, electricity, and heat misconceptions), and collaborated to write stories with guidance from the instructor. Stories were analyzed for narrative and science units, and test scores examined. Without guidance, many students struggled to find ways to integrate science within a story. With guidance, participants wrote stories that included more narrative elements overall, and participants felt the stories helped them understand the concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S., & Smith, D. (1992). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. In Proceedings of the second international conference on the history and philosophy of science in science education. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.
Akerson, V. L., Flick, L. G., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of young children’s ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 363–385.
Appleton, K., Gins, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (2000). The development of preservice elementary science teacher education in Australia. In S. K. Abell (Ed.), Science teacher education: An international perspective (pp. 9–29). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Banister, F., & Ryan, C. (2001). Developing science concepts through story telling. School Science Review, 83, 75–83.
Campbell, P. (1998). Using stories to enrich the physics curriculum. Physics Education, 33, 356–358.
Cook Smith, N. (2009). Psychometric qualities of MOSART tests. Project MOSART: Misconception oriented standards-based assessment resource for teachers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Coyle, H. (2009). Personal communication, November 19, 2009.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dillon, J., Osborne, J., Fairbrother, R., & Kurina, L. (2000). A study into the professional views of science teachers in primary and secondary schools in England. London: Council for Science and Technology.
Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
El-Hindi, A. E. (2003). Integrating literacy and science in the classroom: From ecomysteries to readers’ theatre. Reading Teacher, 56, 536–538.
Ford, D. (2004). Scaffolding preservice teachers’ evaluation of children’s science literature: Attention to science-focused genres and use. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 133–153.
Frisch, J. K., & Saunders, G. (2008). Using stories in an introductory college biology course. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 164–169.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2006). Humanizing the teaching of physics through storytelling: The case of current electricity. Physics Education, 41, 41–46.
Hamer, L. (1999). A folkloristic approach to understanding teachers as storytellers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 363–380.
Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2006). Moving from border crossing to convergence of perspectives in language and science literacy research and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 101–107.
Hulland, C., & Munby, H. (1994). Science, stories, and sense-making: A comparison of qualitative data from a wetlands unit. Science Education, 78, 117–136.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two- year science inservice programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1787–1811.
Mallan, K. (1991). Children as story tellers. Newton, NSW, Australia: Primary English Teacher Association.
Negrete, A. (2002). Science via fictional narratives: Communicating science through literary forms. Ludus Vitalis, 10, 197–204.
Rex, L. A., Murnen, T. J., Hobbs, J., & McEachen, D. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical stories and the shaping of classroom participation: “The dancer” and “Graveyard shift at the 7–11”. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 765–796.
Ritchie, S., Rigano, D., & Duane, A. (2008). Writing an ecological mystery in class: Merging genres and learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 143–166.
Schank, R., & Abelson, B. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In J. R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 8, pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Solomon, J. (2002). Science stories and science texts: What can they do for our students? Studies in Science Education, 37, 85–106.
Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79, 555–581.
Yager, R. E., & Weld, J. D. (1999). Scope, sequence and coordination: The Iowa Project, a national reform effort in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 169–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Final versions of selected science stories can be found on the author’s Web page: http://tinyurl.com/Frisch-science-stories.
Appendices
Appendix A
Directions for Part 1 of Study
EXTRA CREDIT ASSIGNMENT: SCIENCE STORIES
Choose a concept (or two) from the list below:
-
Static electricity
-
Current electricity
-
Ohm’s law
-
Conduction
-
Convection
-
Radiation
-
Electromagnetism
-
Transverse waves
-
Sound waves
-
Light waves
-
Electromagnetic waves
For your chosen concept(s), write a short story or anecdote. Your story can be based on personal experience, totally factual, totally fictional, or some combination of these. For example, if you have ever been fishing on a lake and noticed the sky darkened and everyone’s hair started to stand on end, you might write about that in order to illustrate static electricity. However, you might change the story to include a young boy and/or a young girl, and add some details or some excitement.
Remember that it is important that your story give some kind of illustration or explanation that might help one of your students understand the science concept.
Your story will also need to include the following things:
-
1.
At least one character (can be human, animal, electron, etc. can be you but we’ll change your name)
-
2.
Some kind of plot (including conflict- something has to happen to the character)
-
3.
Some kind of resolution or conclusion
Along with your story, please submit your answers to the following questions:
-
1.
How does your story illustrate or explain your science concept?
-
2.
Did the process of writing this story help you understand the concept better than you did before? If yes, how?
-
3.
What are the limitations of your story? In other words, are there some ways that this story might give your students misconceptions or make them confused about the concept?
Appendix B
Directions for Part 2 of Study
The goal of this project is to develop some physical science-related stories as a group. Working on the story together is a great way to help students have ownership over the process of learning a concept, so we’re going to try to model that on the discussion boards of WebCT. In order to get credit for the assignment, you will have to make a contribution to each phase of the story. We will decide, as lab groups, on different components of our story to include, so it is important for you to participate in that process, but it is also important for you to make suggestions for us to vote on. In order for your contribution to be considered significant, you will have to include either a suggestion for the story, or an opinion with explanation about which components should be included. The stories’ purpose will be dispelling some common misconceptions about electricity, heat, or force. As part of your process, you can decide which misconception(s) you want your story to address.
-
PHASE ONE: The basics
-
You will need to make suggestions and express opinions on the following:
-
MISCONCEPTION: which misconception would you like to address?
-
CHARACTERS (how many should there be? Name(s)? Gender(s)? Background info?)
-
SETTING (where should the story take place)?
-
CONFLICT: What happens to the character(s)? How does this advance the plot?
-
PHASE TWO: The plot
-
What should happen in the beginning of the story?
-
What kind of climax should the story have?
-
How should the story end?
-
PHASE THREE: The details
-
Story dialogue
-
Story narrative
-
Story pictures
At the end, I hope to be able to compile little booklets of your story to distribute to all of you. You may find them helpful in your classroom!
About this article
Cite this article
Frisch, J.K. The Stories They’d Tell: Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Writing Stories to Demonstrate Physical Science Concepts. J Sci Teacher Educ 21, 703–722 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9210-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9210-3