Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Formative assessment provides a means to successfully scaffold learning. Unfortunately, few teachers understand the pedagogical implications of such scaffolding or their role in utilizing formative assessments. The purpose of our study was to develop an understanding of the experience of being a teacher that is seeking to improve learning through formative assessment and using that understanding to improve our practices in teacher education. Three categories emerged from the data analysis: (1) questioning the validity of tacit pedagogical understandings, (2) understanding the experiences of the students, and (3) exploring the need to develop a more reflexive classroom. The findings from this study are useful for persons seeking to prepare teachers to guide science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Volkmann, M. J. (2006). Seamless assessment in science: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints for reform: Science, mathematics, and technology education, Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., & Mitchener, C. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. (2007). Classroom assessments of science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. K. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 965–1006). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 82, 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (1998). Formative assessment: Raising standards inside the classroom. School Science Review, 80(291), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (2003). Classroom implications and the formative-summative interface. Measurement, 1, 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science students’ role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 11, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2008). Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gearhart, M., Nagashima, S., Pfotenhauer, J., Clark, S., Schwab, C., Vendlinski, T., et al. (2006). Developing expertise with classroom assessment in K–12 science: Learning to interpret student work. Interim findings from a two-year study. Educational Assessment, 11, 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in education evaluation (CSE monograph series in evaluation no. 8). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, D. (1994). Performance assessment in review: New directions for assessing student understanding. International Journal of Education Research, 21, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, P., & Reason, H. (2002). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 179–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case-study of a whole-school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1987). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women Students’ International Forum, 11, 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latta, M. M., Buck, G., & Beckenhauer, A. (2007). Formative assessment requires artistic vision. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Welch, W. (2001). The science achievement of various subgroups on alternative assessment formats. Science Education, 85, 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. T. (1993). Doing feminist ethnography: Lessons from feminist classrooms. Qualitative Studies in Education, 6, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom decision-making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlecamp, C. H., & Subramaniam, B. (1999). What is feminist pedagogy? Useful ideas for teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 520–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1999). The assessment of science meets the science of assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Evaluation Resource Library. (2001). STEP faculty observation. Retrieved 10 April 2009, from http://oerl.sri.com/instruments/te/obsvclassrm/instr76.html.

  • Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 497–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M. (2003). Working with teachers in assessment-related professional development. In J. M. Atkin & J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 109–120). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2003). Reconsidering large-scale assessment to heighten its relevance to learning. In J. M. Atkin & J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 121–146). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomanek, D., Talamquer, V., & Novodvorsky, I. (2008). What do science teachers consider when selecting formative assessment tasks? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1113–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify a theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward a more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 11, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, B. H. W. (2001a). Examiner, policeman, or students’ companion: Teachers’ perceptions of their role in an assessment reform. Educational Review, 53, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, B. H. W. (2001b). Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 985–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Gayle A. Buck & Amy E. Trauth-Nare

Authors
  1. Gayle A. Buck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy E. Trauth-Nare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayle A. Buck.

About this article

Cite this article

Buck, G.A., Trauth-Nare, A.E. Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning. J Sci Teacher Educ 20, 475–494 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation