The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of preservice elementary teachers in a content-specific field-based experience with elementary science specialists. Data collected from electronic discussions, interviews, and observations in the field revealed preservice teachers experienced a wide range of instructional and assessment strategies in specialists’ classrooms, but failed to generalize aspects of the specialist model of science instruction to traditional models for delivery of science instruction at the elementary level. Implications for supporting preservice teachers’ learning to teach science through participation in a field experience with specialists are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Abell, S. K. (1990). A case for the elementary science specialist. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 291–301.
Abell, S. K. (2006). Challenges and opportunities for field experiences in elementary science teacher preparation. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 7–89). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods courses using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theories and methods (pp. 22–27)). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Campbell, B., & Fulton, L. (2003). Science notebooks: Writing about inquiry. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation. (2000). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: Practices for the new millennia. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction—a social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49–58.
Dickinson, V. L., & Young, T. A. (1998). Elementary science and language arts: Should we blur the boundaries? School Science and Mathematics, 98, 334–340.
Dueck, K., Altmann, H., Haslett, K., & Latimer, J. (1984). Early exploratory field experiences in teacher preparation programs. Education Canada, 24, 34–38.
Ebenezer, J. V., Lugo, F., Beirnacka, B., & Puvirajah, A. (2003). Community building through electronic discussion boards: Preservice teachers’ reflective dialogues on science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 397–411.
Fulp, S. (2001). The status of elementary science teaching: A report of the 2000 National Survey of Mathematics and Science Education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.
Jones, M. G., & Edmunds, J. (2006). Models of elementary science instruction: Roles of science specialists. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 317–344). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 755–777.
Krustchinsky, R., & Moore, B. (1981). Early field experiences: A vital part in the training of elementary teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 17(4), 119–120.
Moseley, C., Ramsey, S. J., & Ruff, K. (2004). Science buddies: An authentic context for developing preservice teachers’ understandings of learning, teaching, and scientific inquiry. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 1–18.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Olson, A. K. (1992). In praise of the classroom teacher. Science and Children, 29(1), 16–17.
Pryor, C., & Kuhn, J. (2004). Do you see what I see? Bringing field experience observations into methods courses. The Teacher Educator, 39, 249–266.
Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (1999, April). An explanatory study of the “effectiveness” of elementary science specialists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Austin, TX.
Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary schools. Science Education, 74, 421–424.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.
van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Teacher Education, 87, 588–603.
Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.
Westerback, M. E. (1982). Studies on attitude toward teaching science and anxiety about teaching science in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 603–616.
Appendix: Field Discussion Prompts Provided to Students
Appendix: Field Discussion Prompts Provided to Students
The following are suggested to focus your observations of science teaching in your field placement and guide your discussion in Blackboard. You should log in each week to share your own experiences in the field, as well as respond to the posts of your classmates.
In class, we discuss the use of specialists to teach science. From your conversations with the specialists and your observations of both the regular classroom setting and sessions for science, what do you see as the advantages/disadvantages of this model?
You analyzed your prior science learning experiences by writing a science autobiography. How does the science instruction you observe in your field placement compare to your own experiences?
How do specialists address the state and national standards in their lessons? How do they determine whether students have met these standards?
You have been introduced to a number of questioning strategies in the methods course. How would you characterize the questioning strategies used by the specialist you observe?
You have been introduced to a number of common misconceptions elementary learners hold about science. Do the students with whom you are working have misconceptions you can identify? How do you know?
You are learning about different assessment strategies for identifying students’ prior knowledge, measuring student learning, and evaluating instruction. Describe an assessment used by the specialist you observe. What was the purpose of this assessment? What information was gained through this strategy? How was this information used to improve teaching/learning?
In class, we have explored the use of science notebooks. How are notebooks utilized in the science classroom you observe?
This semester we have focused on inquiry-based instruction. In what types of inquiry do the students in the classroom you observe engage? What is the specialist’s role during inquiry? What is the students’ role?
We use the nature of science as a framework for teaching and learning science in the methods course. How is the nature of science reflected in the lesson you observe? How is the nature of science being conveyed to students?
We have discussed the challenges of managing science instruction in the methods course. What classroom management and materials management strategies have you observed in the field?
You have been introduced to several ways to assist students with special needs in being successful in the science classroom. How do the diverse students in your classroom receive support from the specialist? From other professionals?
About this article
Cite this article
Varma, T., Hanuscin, D.L. Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Field Experiences in Classrooms Led by Science Specialists. J Sci Teacher Educ 19, 593–614 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9110-y
- Science Teaching
- Preservice Teacher
- Prospective Teacher
- Science Classroom
- Elementary Teacher