Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 699–723 | Cite as

Does Increasing Biology Teacher Knowledge of Evolution and the Nature of Science Lead to Greater Preference for the Teaching of Evolution in Schools?



This study investigated whether or not an increase in secondary science teacher knowledge about evolution and the nature of science gained from completing a graduate-level evolution course was associated with greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools. Forty-four precertified secondary biology teachers participated in a 14-week intervention designed to address documented misconceptions identified by a precourse instrument. The course produced statistically significant gains in teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science and a significant decrease in misconceptions about evolution and natural selection. Nevertheless, teachers’ postcourse preference positions remained unchanged; the majority of science teachers still preferred that antievolutionary ideas be taught in school.


Evolution Evolution education Biology education Natural selection Intelligent design Creationism Science teachers 


  1. Affanato, F. E. (1986). A survey of biology teachers’ opinions about the teachings of evolutionary theory and/or the creation model in the united states in public and private schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  2. Albarracín, D., McNatt, P. S., Klein, C. T. F., Ho, R. M., Mitchell, A. L., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Persuasive communications to change actions: An analysis of behavioral and cognitive impact in HIV prevention. Health Psychology, 22, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alters, B. (1997). Should student belief of evolution be a goal? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 17(1), 15–16.Google Scholar
  4. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56, 1891–1901.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angiullo, L., Whitbourne, S. K., & Powers, C. (1996). The effects of instruction and experience on college students’ attitudes toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 22, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, B., & Anderson, C. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, D. J. (2001). Substantial numbers of Americans continue to doubt evolution as explanation for origin of humans. Retrieved March 5, 2001 from
  10. Brumby, M. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13, 119–122.Google Scholar
  11. Brumby, M. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carmel, S., Cwikel, J., & Galinsky, D. (1992). Changes in knowledge, attitudes, and work preferences following courses in gerontology among medical, nursing, and social work students. Educational Gerontology, 18, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2001). Distinguishing between understanding and belief. Theory Into Practice, 40, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clough, E. E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 125–130.Google Scholar
  15. Coburn, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coburn, W. W. (2004). Apples and oranges: A rejoinder to Smith and Siegel. Science & Education, 13, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, R. A. (2001). The goal of evolution instruction: Belief or literacy? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 21(1–2), 14–18.Google Scholar
  18. Dagher, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davson-Galle, P. (2004). Understanding: Knowledge, belief, and understanding. Science & Education, 13, 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deadman, J. A., & Kelly, P. J. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
  21. Demastes, S. S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. G. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erickson, C. K., Wilcox, R. E., Miller, G. W., Littlefield, J. H., & Lawson, K. A. (2003). Effectiveness of addiction science presentations to treatment professionals: Using a modified Solomon study design. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eve, R. A., & Dunn, D. (1990). Psychic powers, astrology, and creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology life science teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 52(l), 10–21.Google Scholar
  25. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct in its implications for science education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages. Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  27. Greene, E. D., Jr. (1990). The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 875–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grose, E. C., & Simpson, R. D. (1982). Attitude of introductory college biology students toward evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halldén, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, M. B., Walters, L. C., & Waschull, S. (1991). Altering attitudes and knowledge about obesity. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Teaching evolution using a historically rich curriculum and paired problem-solving instructional strategy. The American Biology Teacher, 59, 208–212.Google Scholar
  33. Jiménez, A. M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, R. L., & Peebles, E. E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: Student acceptance of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 49(2), 94–98.Google Scholar
  35. Koumi, I., & Tsiantis, J. (2001). Smoking trends in adolescence: Report on a Greek school-based, peer-led intervention aimed at prevention. Health Promotion International, 16, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawson, A. E., & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: Effects of instruction and reasoning skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief, and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar
  40. National Association of Biology Teachers (2004). Statement on teaching evolution. Retrieved February 21, 2007 from
  41. National Research Council. (1995). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  42. National Science Teachers Association. (1997). An NSTA position statement on the teaching of evolution. Science-Scope, 2, 26–27. Google Scholar
  43. Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Bioscience, 57, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nehm, R. H., & Sheppard, K. (2004, April). A comparative study of evolutionary understanding and advocacy for teaching evolution in pre-certified biology and other science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  45. Newport, F. (2006). Almost half of Americans believe humans did not evolve. Retrieved February 21, 2007 from
  46. Nierstheimer, S. L., Hopkins, C. J., Dillon, D. R., & Schmitt, M. C. (2000). Preservice teachers’ shifting beliefs about struggling literacy learners. Reading Research & Instruction, 40, 1–16.Google Scholar
  47. Osif, B. A. (1997). Evolution and religious beliefs: A survey of Pennsylvania high school teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 59, 552–556.Google Scholar
  48. Pankratius, W. J. (1993). The constructivist transformation of a preservice teacher’s views on teaching creationism and evolution. Available from the Educational Resources Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED361210).Google Scholar
  49. Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pigliucci, M. (2002). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism and the nature of science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  51. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. (L. der Forschung, Trans.). London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1935).Google Scholar
  52. Ryan, A., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scharmann, L. C. (1993). Teaching evolution: Designing successful instruction. The American Biology Teacher, 55, 481–486.Google Scholar
  54. Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott, E. C. (2004). Evolution versus creationism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  56. Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Showers, D. E., & Shrigley, R. L. (1995). Effects of knowledge and persuasion on high-school students’ attitudes toward nuclear power plants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F. M., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinclair, A., & Pendarvis, M. P. (1997/1998). Evolution vs. conservative religious beliefs: Can biology instructors assist students with their dilemma? Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, 167–170.Google Scholar
  60. Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P., & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students’ beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 118–125.Google Scholar
  61. Slusher, M. P., & Anderson, C. A. (1996). Using causal persuasive arguments to change beliefs and teach new information: The mediating role of explanation availability and evaluation bias in the acceptance of knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, M. U. (1994). Counterpoint: Belief, understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31, 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, M. U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science & Education, 13, 553–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Southerland, S. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Southerland, S., & Sinatra, G. (2003). Learning about biological evolution: A special case of intentional conceptual change. In: G. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 317–348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Southerland, S., Sinatra, G., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stallings, M. A. (1996). Enhancing an understanding of evolution: The influence of a diversified instructional strategy on high school biology students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
  68. Tatina, R. (1989). South Dakota high school biology teachers and the teaching of evolution and creationism. The American Biology Teacher, 51, 275–280.Google Scholar
  69. Trowbridge, J. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1994). Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. University of California Museum of Paleontology. (2004). Understanding evolution. Retrieved February 21, 2007 from Scholar
  71. Wright, H. O., Jr., Bohm, R. M., & Jamieson, K. M. (1995). A comparison of uninformed and informed death penalty opinions: A replication and expansion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, M. (1987). The evolution–creation controversy: Opinions of Ohio high school biology teachers. Ohio Journal of Science, 87(4), 115–125.Google Scholar
  73. Zuzovsky, R. (1994). Conceptualizing a teaching experience on the development of the idea of evolution: An epistemological approach to the education of science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Education and Human EcologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Education and Psychology, The City CollegeThe City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.The Graduate CenterThe City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations