Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 319–343 | Cite as

Language in Science Education as a Gatekeeper to Learning, Teaching, and Professional Development

  • Felicia M. MooreEmail author
Article

In this study, I used a feminist poststructural perspective to explain how language is a gatekeeper in learning science, in achieving professional honors in teaching science, and in teaching science to English language learners. The various uses of language revealed interesting dynamics related to the culture of power of language and the culture of power of science along race–ethnicity, gender, and class dimensions for teachers. Teachers did not necessarily see language as having distinct purposes and uses. This further maintained the gatekeeping nature of language and discourse in science education. I discuss implications for looking at language in science education for teacher professional development and student learning.

Keywords

Professional Development Science Teacher Science Classroom English Language Learner Teacher Professional Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atwater, M. M. (2000). Equity for Black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, A. A. (1995). Cultural criticism: A primer of key concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  5. Calabrese-Barton, A. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Clough, P. T. (1998). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Coffey, A., & Anderson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, P. H. (2000). What’s going on? Black feminist thought and the politics of postmodernism. In E. A. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 41–73). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practices of qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (1997). Narrative research: Political issues and implication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(1), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Hatch, J. A., & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life history and narrative: Questions, issues, and exemplary works. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 113–135). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hildebrand, G. (2001). Re/writing science from the margins. In A. C. Barton & M. D. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses & classroom practice (pp. 161–199). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Hinchey, P. (1998). Finding freedom in the classroom: A practical introduction to critical theory. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 279–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Longino, H. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Science and feminism (pp. 45–57). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lorde, A. (2000). Age, race, class, and sex: Women defining difference. In M. B. Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Gender through the prism of difference (pp. 503–508). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, K. (1998). Reflections on being female in school science: Toward a praxis of teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, N. (2000). Learning from experience in adult education. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 71–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, F. M. (2003a). In the midst of it all: A feminist perspective on science and science teaching. In A. L. Green & L. V. Scott (Eds.), Journey to the Ph.D.: How to navigate the process as African Americans (pp. 105–121). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, F. M. (2003b). Professional development and poststructural analysis: Stories of African American science teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  31. Munro, P. (1998). Subject to fiction: Women teachers’ life history narratives and the cultural politics of resistance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2004). Exploring differences in minority and majority teachers’ decisions about preparation for NBPTS certification. Retrieved February 18, 2005, from http://www.nbpts.org/research/archive_3.cfm?id=160.Google Scholar
  33. Ogbu, J. O. (2000). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. In B. Levinson (Ed.), Schooling the symbolic animal (pp. 190–206). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Osborne, M. D., & Calabrese-Barton, A. (2000). Science for all Americans: Critiquing science education reform efforts. In C. Cornbleth (Ed.), Curriculum politics, policy, practice: Cases in comparative context (pp. 49–76). New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  35. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1000–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 477–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steinberg, S. R., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1998). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice & poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkU.S.A

Personalised recommendations