Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Science Teaching, Professional Development and No Child Left Behind: Barriers, Dilemmas, and Reality

  • Letter from the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berns, B. B., & Swanson, J. (2000, April). Middle school science: Working in a confused context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444944).

  • Czerniak, C. M., Beltyukova, S., Struble, J., Haney, J. J., & Lumpe, A. T. (2005). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5–8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13–43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. (in press-a). A study of sustained, whole-school, professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

  • Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. (in press-b). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education.

  • Johnson, C. C., & Marx, S. (2006). Transformative professional development: A model for urban science education reform. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Kahle, J. B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Secker, C. E., & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., & Wright, C. S. (2000). A commentary on the profound changes envisioned by the national science standards. Teachers College Record, 100, 122–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla C. Johnson.

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, C.C. Effective Science Teaching, Professional Development and No Child Left Behind: Barriers, Dilemmas, and Reality. J Sci Teacher Educ 18, 133–136 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9037-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9037-0

Keywords

Navigation