Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetically separable WO3/CuFe2O4 composite for visible light induced photoreduction of Cr(VI)

  • Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for catalytic, photoelectrochemical and sensor applications
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) through water sources can cause serious damage to humans and other organisms. Hence, the removal of toxic Cr(VI) ions from the water environment is of great importance in the field of wastewater treatment. In this study, the Cr(VI) removal was performed through the photoreduction technique. Because of its tunable optical band gap, tungsten oxide (WO3), which can be driven by the visible light, was selected as the photocatalyst. To enhance the effective separation of the photoinduced charge carriers, WO3 was coupled with a magnetic semiconductor, copper ferrite (CuFe2O4). A co-precipitation technique was used to synthesize WO3 in nanoparticle form and the as-prepared WO3 nanoparticles were used to prepare WO3/CuFe2O4 composites through an auto-combustion sol-gel technique. When WO3 was coupled with CuFe2O4, the Cr(VI) photoreduction efficiency was enhanced from 23.9% to 60.0% within 120 min of visible light irradiation. The Cr(VI) photoreduction performance of the WO3/CuFe2O4 composite was studied under various conditions also. Within this scope, the initial pH, ion concentration and photocatalyst concentration of the Cr(VI) solution was investigated. The effect of competing substances in a real wastewater sample on the Cr(VI) photoreduction activity was also studied. To understand the Cr(VI) photoreduction mechanism, electron-hole scavengers were used. Based on the trapping experiment, photoinduced electrons of both semiconductors contributed as the main active species in the Cr(VI) photoreduction process. According to reusability experiment, the Cr(VI) removal rate of the composite sample reduced from 60.0% to 47.2% after four consecutive photoreduction cycles.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • Magnetic composite photocatalyst in nanoparticle size was obtained.

  • Coupling WO3 with CuFe2O4 suppressed the recombination rate on WO3.

  • Coupling WO3 with CuFe2O4 enhanced the Cr(VI) removal rate of WO3 by almost 36%.

  • Competing substances in the real wastewater environment suppressed the Cr(VI) photoreduction efficiency by almost 9%.

  • The photoinduced electrons were the main active species in the Cr(VI) photoreduction process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He HB, Luo ZZ, Yu CL (2020) Water-soluble natural organic acid for highly efficient photoreduction of hexavalent chromium. J Chem Sci 132(1):113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alenad AM, Waheed MS, Aman S, Ahmad N, Khan AR, Khosa RY, Ansari MZ, Khan SA, Farid HM, Taha TA (2023) Visible light driven Ni doped hematite for photocatalytic reduction of noxious methylene blue. Mater Res Bull 28:112306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang L, Sun J, Niu WY, Cao FM (2020) The synergetic role of rice straw in enhancing the process of Cr(VI) photoreduction by oxalic acid. Environ Pollut 265:115013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang CJ, Yang GL, Shi WB, Matras-Postolek K, Yang P (2021) Construction of 2D/2D MoS2/g-C3N4 Heterostructures for Photoreduction of Cr (VI). Langmuir 37(20):6337–6346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luong GK, Ku Y (2022) Enhanced photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution by UV/TiO2 process in the presence of Fe(III): Performance, kinetic, and mechanisms. Chem Eng Process 181:109135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony ET, Oladoja NA (2022) Process enhancing strategies for the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) via photocatalytic pathway. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(6):8026–8053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Santoso UT, Mustikasaria K, Santosa SJ, Siswanta D (2007) Study on Sensitization of Fulvic Acid on Photoreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by TiO2 Photocatalyst. Indones J Chem 7(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Selli E, DeGiorgi A, Bidoglio G (1996) Humic acid-sensitized photoreduction of Cr(VI) on ZnO particles. Environ Sci Technol 30(2):598–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2009) Photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets on TiO2 thin film for photoinactivation of bacteria in solar light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 113(47):20214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Podporska-Carroll J, Myles A, Quilty B, McCormack DE, Fagan R, Hinder SJ, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2017) Antibacterial properties of F-doped ZnO visible light photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 324:39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nayak A, Lee S, Choi Y, Yoon H, Sohn Y, Pradhan D (2017) Crystal phase and size-controlled synthesis of tungsten trioxide hydrate nanoplates at room temperature: enhanced Cr (VI) photoreduction and methylene blue adsorption properties. ACS Sustain. Chem Eng 5:2741–2750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou J, Cai WY, Ding J, Wan H, Guan GF (2021) 0D/1D Z-scheme g-C3N4 quantum dot/WO3 composite for efficient Cr (VI) photoreduction under visible light. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagarjuna R, Challagulla S, Sahu P, Roy S, Ganesan R (2017) Polymerizable sol-gel synthesis of nano-crystalline WO3 and its photocatalytic Cr (VI) reduction under visible light. Adv Powder Technol 28:3265–3273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang LX, Xiao Y, Liu SH, Li Y, Cai QY, Luo SL, Zeng GM (2010) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) on WO3 doped long TiO2 nanotube arrays in the presence of citric acid. Appl Catal B-Environ 94(1-2):142–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hua YX, Hu CY, Arif M, Chen SM, Zhang M, Liu XH (2022) Direct Z-scheme WO3/In2S3 heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic reduction Cr(VI). J Alloy Compd 908:164488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saravanakumar K, Balakumar V, Jones BF, Muthuraj V (2021) A structural unique 1D-MoO3@3D-WO3 nanohybrid for stable and reusable photocatalytic conversion of hexavalent chromium in aqueous medium. Mater Chem Phys 267:124688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hariz SHB, Lahmar H, Rekhila G, Bouhala A, Trari M, Benamira M (2022) A novel MgCr2O4/WO(3) hetero-junction photocatalyst for solar photo reduction of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI). J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem 430:113986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lian XY, Huang ZY, Zhang YQ, Chen Z, Meidl P, Yi XD, Xu BL (2023) Constructing Z-scheme 1D/2D heterojunction of ZnIn2S4 nanosheets decorated WO3 nanorods to enhance Cr(VI) photocatalytic reduction and rhodamine B degradation. Chemosphere 313:137351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Akhavan O, Choobtashani M, Ghaderi E (2012) Protein degradation and RNA efflux of viruses photocatalyzed by graphene–tungsten oxide composite under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 116(17):9653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao YL, Lin CP, Bi HJ, Liu YG, Yan QS (2017) Magnetically separable CuFe2O4/AgBr composite photocatalysts: Preparation, characterization, photocatalytic activity and photocatalytic mechanism under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 392:701–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang EL, Wang LJ, Zhang BG, Xie YP, Wang GS (2019) Shape-controlled hydrothermal synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanocrystals for enhancing photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance. Mater Chem Phys 235:121633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu YY, Zhang HQ (2016) Reduced Graphene Oxide Coupled Magnetic CuFe2O4-TiO2 Nanoparticles with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity for Methylene Blue Degradation. Chin J Struct Chem 35(3):472–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao W, Jin Y, Gao CH, Gu W, Jin ZM, Lei YL, Liao LS (2014) A simple method for fabricating p-n junction photocatalyst CuFe2O4/Bi4Ti3O12 and its photocatalytic activity. Mater Chem Phys 143(3):952–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amuthan T, Sanjeevi R, Kannan GR, Sridevi A (2022) A novel p-CuFe2O4/n-ZnS heterojunction photocatalyst: Co-precipitation synthesis, characterization and improved visible-light driven photocatalytic activity for removal of MB and CV dyes. Physica B 638:413842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun BH, Li HF, Wei Q, Xue S, Zhou AJ, Yue XP (2022) Enhanced quinoline degradation by persulfate-assisted photocatalytic process with WO3-CuFe2O4 Z-scheme system: Properties and mechanism. Sep Purif Technol 301:122039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, He H, Li J, Li W, Yang Y, Li Y, Chen Q (2015) Preparation and enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of ap–n heterojunction CuFe2O4/WO3 nanocomposite film. RSC Adv 5(120):99378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sayadi MH, Ahmadpour N, Homaeigohar S (2021) Photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of Ag-CuFe2O4@ WO3 magnetic nanocomposite. Nanomater 11(2):298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nasrallah N, Kebir M, Koudri Z, Trari M (2011) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) on the novel hetero-system CuFe2O4/CdS. J Hazard Mater 185(2-3):1398–1404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thilagavathi T, Venugopal D, Marnadu R, Chandrasekaran J, Alshahrani T, Shkir M (2021) An Investigation on Microstructural, Morphological, Optical, Photoluminescence and Photocatalytic Activity of WO(3) for Photocatalysis Applications: An Effect of Annealing. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 31(3):1217–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiao YX, Wang S, Liu YP, Li X, Yang WL, Han S, Zhang H, Jiang JX (2023) A novel Zn0.5Cd0.5S/WO3middotH2O S-scheme heterostructures with one-pot synthesis for significant photodegradation of toxic Cr (VI) and organic RhB pollutants: Kinetics, degradation mechanism and photocatalytic evaluation. J Alloy Compd 938:168576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu T, Wang LS, Yang P, Hu BY (2008) Preparation of nanometer CuFe2O4 by auto-combustion and its catalytic activity on the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate. Mater Lett 62(24):4056–4058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun J, Sun YQ, Zhang L, Cao FM (2022) The highly enhanced Cr(VI) photoreduction removal by oxalic acid coordinated with iron-loaded waste Loofah. Environ Res 205:112456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Azmat S, Jan T, Ilyas SZ, Hassan A, Habib I, Mahmood Q, Mahmood A (2018) Solar light triggered photocatalytic performance of WO3 nanostructures; waste water treatment. Mater Res Express 5(11):115025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Warsi AZ, Ahmad T, Aziz F, Warsi MF, Munir S, Agboola PO, Shakir I (2022) Synthesis and characterisation of WO3 and Ag2O nanoparticles and their nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of dyes. Int J Environ Anal Chem https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2022.2071610

  35. Othman I, Abu Haija M, Banat F (2019) Catalytic Properties of Phosphate-Coated CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles for Phenol Degradation. J Nanomater 2019:3698326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amulya MAS, Nagaswarupa HP, Kumar MRA, Ravikumar CR, Kusuma KB, Prashantha SC (2021) Evaluation of bifunctional applications of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized by a sonochemical method. J Phys Chem Solids 148:109756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Farhadian M, Sangpour P, Hosseinzadeh G (2015) Morphology dependent photocatalytic activity of WO3 nanostructures. J Energy Chem 24(2):171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang L, Hu H, Xu J, Zhu S, Ding A, Deng C (2019) WO3 nanocubes: Hydrothermal synthesis, growth mechanism, and photocatalytic performance. J Mater Res 34(17):2955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Karim K, Tarek M, Sarkar M, Ong HR, Abdullah H, Cheng C, Khan M (2020) Selective synthesis of methanol by photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 over PANI-CuFe2O4 hybrid catalyst. Mater Sci Eng 736:042020

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li T, Guo X, Zhang LJ, Yan T, Jin ZL (2021) 2D CoP supported 0D WO3 constructed S-scheme for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(39):20560–20572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma LJ, Xu J, Li LJ, Mao M, Zhao S (2020) Hydrothermal synthesis of WO3/CoS2 n-n heterojunction for Z-scheme photocatalytic H-2 evolution. New J Chem 44(42):18326–18336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohagheghian A, Ayagh K, Godini K, Shirzad-Siboni M (2018) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) from synthetic, real drinking waters and electroplating wastewater by synthesized amino-functionalized Fe3O4-WO3 nanoparticles by visible light. J Ind Eng Chem 59:169–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li J, Yu HQ, Yan T, Sun M, Li XG, Song W, Yan LG (2022) Insight into the enhanced visible-light photoreduction of aqueous Cr(VI) by assembled Fe3O4/LDO/BiOBr composites. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 634:128021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Palve AM (2021) Ultra-fast photoreduction of toxic Cr(VI) by CdS-rGO synthesized using single source precursor. J Alloy Compd 868:159143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dhiman P, Sharma S, Kumar A, Shekh M, Sharma G, Naushad M (2020) Rapid visible and solar photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and electrochemical sensing of dopamine using solution combustion synthesized ZnO-Fe2O3 nano heterojunctions: Mechanism Elucidation. Ceram Int 46(8):12255–12268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li LX, Gao HJ, Liu GR, Wang SF, Yi Z, Wu XW, Yang H (2022) Synthesis of carnation flower-like Bi2O2CO3 photocatalyst and its promising application for photoreduction of Cr(VI). Adv Powder Technol 33(3):103481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng XG, Liu TT, Wen J, Liu XH (2021) Flower-like Bi2S3-In2S3 heterojunction for efficient solar light induced photoreduction of Cr(VI). Chemosphere 278:130422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has been supported by Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project Number: MMF.A4.23.002, 2023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Hafize Nagehan Koysuren and Ozcan Koysuren.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafize Nagehan Koysuren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koysuren, H.N., Koysuren, O. Magnetically separable WO3/CuFe2O4 composite for visible light induced photoreduction of Cr(VI). J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 107, 671–684 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-023-06163-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-023-06163-1

Keywords

Navigation