Coating procedure
In this study SiO2 thin film, as an adhesive sublayer, was deposited on the glass surface by sol–gel method using a tetra-urethous silicate and ethanol solution, which was homogenized by a magnetic stirrer for 3 h. In order to apply undoped TiO2 coating, the required sol, including tetrazinopropyl orutylateate dissolved in ethanol and chloridric acid as a catalyst, was prepared with a weight ratio of 1/30/1, respectively. For the main coating process, tetra-isopropyl ortho-titanate (C12H28O4Ti, as a titania precursor), tetrahydro-ethyl octosilicate (C8H20O4Si, as a SiO2 precursor), copper nitrate (Cu3 (NO3)2, as a nitrogen precursor), and urea (CH4N2O, as a copper precursor) were used with 98% purity. The solvent was ethanol with 99.6% purity and the applied catalyst was HCl. Copper and nitrogen doping of the sols was achieved using copper nitrate and urea as dopant precursors. To synthesize N-Cu-TiO2, tetraezopropyl ortho-ethyl acetate, ethanol, and hydrochloric acid were weighed with 1/35/1 ratio. Then the precise amounts of copper nitrate and urea with different values (0.5, 1, and 1.5 wt% of TiO2) were measured. Finally, half of the measured amount of ethanol was mixed with tetra-isopropyl ortho-titanate and hydrochloric acid, which was stirred and homogenized for 30 min by a magnetic stirrer (solution A). Half of the ethanol residue was mixed with copper nitrate and urea and dissolved with a magnetic stirrer for half an hour (solution B). Then solution A was added to this solution drop by drop and allowed to dissolve for a period of 3 h in the stirrer. Finally, the coatings were applied on the glass surface after keeping the prepared sol at room temperature for 24 h. After washing the glass slides in water and ethanol and air drying, the samples were inserted in the sol at the rate of 15 cm/min for 30 s after which taken out at the rate of 6 cm/min.
Differential thermal analysis (DTA)
To evaluate the thermal behavior of coatings and determination of the appropriate heat treatment temperatures, DTA analysis was performed using the DTG-66AH-SHIMADZU device. Thermal analysis of TiO2 powder was conducted at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The reference material was α-alumina and the temperature increasing rate was set as 10 °C/min. To provide TiO2 powder, the prepared sols were exposed to free air at ambient temperature for 3 days to form a gel. Then the gels got dried at 100 °C for 24 h and finally grinded into powder. The appropriate heat treatment, to achieve the desired crystalline phase in the coatings, was performed for 2 h in an electric furnace at the maximum crystallization temperature determined by DTA.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
To identify the different phases in the heat-treated samples, The XRD patterns were acquired by Siemens D500 diffractometer. Identification of the phases was performed with a PDF-card of each phase, employing the XPert HighScore software. The crystallite size was measured using the Sherer’s equation as below [17, 27]:
$$D = 0.9\lambda /B\cos \theta _{\mathrm{B}}$$
(1)
where D is the crystallite size, B is the peak width in half of the maximum intensity (radian), λ is the X-ray wavelength, and θB is the Brag angle corresponding to the diffraction peak.
Field emission scanning electron microscopic (FE-SEM) characterization
FESEM (MIRA3 TESCAN) was used for microstructural characterization of undoped and co-doped TiO2 coatings. It was operated at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV and working distance of 5 mm.
UV-Vis spectroscopy
To assess the absorption edge and band gap of titania coatings, the samples were exposed to UV-Vis test using the Spectrophotometer35 and the following equation was employed [27, 28]:
$$E_{{\mathrm{bg}}} = \frac{{1240}}{\lambda }$$
(2)
where λ is the wavelength (nm) and Ebg is the band gap energy (eV).
Photocatalytic property assessment
The photocatalytic property of the coatings was studied by methylene blue (C16H18N3SCl) degradation (5 mg/l) in the presence of sunlight (using methane halide lamp) and UV radiation (using UV-c Philips, 1.5 W lamp). The test duration was 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after which the relevant concentrations were calculated by a spectrophotometer. By drawing the C/C0 curves as a function of time, the amounts of removed colors caused by the photocatalytic activity of the coatings could be comparable [29]:
$${\mathrm{log}}\left( {\frac{I}{{I_0}}} \right) = \varepsilon .C.b$$
(3)
In the above equation, ε is the molar absorption capability, C is the methylene blue sample concentration, b is the sample length exposed to radiation, I is the transition intensity, and I0 is the initial radiation intensity.
Antibacterial trials and calculations
Antibacterial examinations were done on two representatives of each type of bacteria including Escherichia coli (AT-CC 25922) in Gram-negative category and Staphylococcus aureus (AT-CC 33591) in the Gram-positive group. The Luria Broth (LB) solution was prepared by dissolving 17 g of this powder in 500 cc of deionized water. The number of bacterial colonies was enumerated by the standard plate count techniques (15 cc in each plate). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h prior to enumeration. The mixture of nutrient broth (1.3 g) well mixed in deionized water (100 cc) was prepared in the same way as LB medium. The solution was autoclaved at 120 °C for 15 min, and then the bacteria prepared in the previous steps were transferred to this medium and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h, till the solvent color got dark. In order to dilute the final solution, the bacteria were inserted in 250 ml of the physiological saline. To be able to compare and verify the results, specimens were exposed to natural sunlight for 2 h from 12 to 2 p.m. with an average ambient temperature of 30 °C. The UV radiation level was 9 (very high) and the sky was all clear during the whole test time. The specimens were then incubated for 24 h and finally bacterial colonies were enumerated to plot the relative activity graphs. To determine the surface activity level against the bacteria growth, the relative activity was plotted as a function of dopant concentrations [30, 31]:
$${\mathrm{Relative}}\;{\mathrm{activity}} = \{ {\mathrm{log}}\;(A/B){\mathrm{/log}}\;(A)\} \times 100$$
(4)
$${\mathrm{Antibacterial}}\,{\mathrm{activity}} = {\mathrm{log}}\;(A/B)$$
(5)
where A and B are the number of bacterial colonies on the surface of the coated samples and the reference surface, respectively. If Ra = 100, the surface is completely antibacterial, whereas Ra = 0 shows no antibacterial activity [31].
Glass sample preparation
In order to prepare the glass samples, they were autoclaved at 120 °C. Then the bacteria solution was injected by a sampler on the glass surface (100 ml for each sample). Finally, they were exposed to natural sunlight and methane halide lamp with a similar spectrum, every 2 h, periodically. Before counting the numbers of colonies, the specimens were incubated for 24 h.