Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing piezoelectric inkjet printing of silica sols for biosensor production

  • Original Paper: Sol–gel and hybrid materials for biological and health (medical) applications
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inkjet printing of biocompatible silica sols has gained popularity, both for biosensor production and development of holographic devices. However, there still remain significant issues related to premature clogging of inkjet printheads when printing aqueous silica sols. To better understand the causes of clogging of piezoelectric inkjet nozzles, printing studies were coupled with studies of colloidal stability along with silica deposition on surfaces, both under normal flow and piezoelectrically driven oscillating flow through an inkjet cartridge. Our studies show that clogging most likely results from deposition of silica colloids onto the internal surfaces of the printhead, followed by displacement of micron-sized pieces of the deposited material upon piezoelectric deformation of the printhead surface, which then block the nozzles of the printhead. Based on this result, we formulated a low-pH sol derived from sodium silicate and evaluated its colloidal stability, binding to silica surfaces and resistance to clogging of inkjet nozzles under normal and voltage-driven oscillating flow. We show that silica sols with a pH of 3.1 provide optimal printing behavior while allowing reproducible printing of spatially controlled silica patterns on paper to produce enzyme-based biosensing devices.

Use of low-pH-biocompatible silica sols allows long-term piezoelectric inkjet printing of silica inks without clogging, allowing high-throughput production of printed biosensors

Highlights

  • Oscillations during jetting can cause printhead clogging when inkjet printing silica sols.

  • Use of low-pH sols (pH 3.1) allows printing with minimal clogging of nozzles.

  • Low-pH silica sols can be printed reproducibly to create enzyme-based paper sensor strips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pelton R (2009) Bioactive paper - a low cost platform for diagnostics. Trends Anal Chem 28(8):925–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamada K, Henares TG, Suzuki K, Citterio D (2015) Paper-based inkjet-printed microfluidic analytical devices. Angew Chem Int Ed 54(18):5294–5310. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201411508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maejima K, Tomikawa S, Suzuki K, Citterio D (2013) Inkjet printing: An integrated and green chemical approach to microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Rsc Adv 3(24):9258–9263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, Carrilho E (2010) Diagnostics for the developing world: Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Anal Chem 82(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9013989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Rossignol F, Macdonald J (2015) Inkjet printing for biosensor fabrication: Combining chemistry and technology for advanced manufacturing. Lab Chip 15(12):2538–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hossain SMZ, Luckham RE, McFadden MJ, Brennan JD (2009) Reagentless bidirectional lateral flow bioactive paper sensors for detection of pesticides in beverage and food samples. Anal Chem 81(21):9055–9064. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901714h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hossain SMZ, Luckham RE, Smith AM, Lebert JM, Davies LM, Pelton R, Filipe CDM, Brennan JD (2009) Development of a bioactive paper sensor for detection of neurotoxins using piezoelectric inkjet printing of sol-gel derived bioinks. Anal Chem 81:5474–5483. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900660p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Bowie D, Zhang X, Filipe C, Pelton R, Brennan JD (2014) Morphology and entrapped enzyme performance in inkjet-printed sol–gel coatings on paper. Chem Mater 26(5):1941–1947. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500206s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chouiki M, Schoeftner R (2011) Inkjet printing of inorganic sol–gel ink and control of the geometrical characteristics. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 58(1):91–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-010-2360-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Safaryan SM, Yakovlev AV, Vinogradov AV, Vinogradov VV (2017) Inkjet printing of the chromogen free oxidase based optical biosensors. Sens Actuat B-Chem 251:746–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodahl M, Kasemo B (1996) On the measurement of thin liquid overlayers with the quartz-crystal microbalance. Sens Actuators A: Phys 54(1–3):448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dressaire E, Sauret A (2017) Clogging of microfluidic systems. Soft Matter 13(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01879C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim B-H, Kim T-G, Lee T-K, Kim S, Shin S-J, Kim S-J, Lee S-J (2009) Effects of trapped air bubbles on frequency responses of the piezo-driven inkjet printheads and visualization of the bubbles using synchrotron x-ray. Sens Actuators A: Phys 154(1):132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jong J, de Bruin G, Reinten H, van den Berg M, Wijshoff H, Versluis M, Lohse D (2006) Air entrapment in piezo-driven inkjet printheads. J Acoust Soc Am 120(3):1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2216560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beulen B, Jong Jd, Reinten H, Berg Mvd, Wijshoff H, van Dongen R (2006) Flows on the nozzle plate of an inkjet printhead. Exp Fluids 42(2):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0232-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Jong J, Jeurissen R, Borel H, Berg Mvd, Wijshoff H, Reinten H, Versluis M, Prosperetti A, Lohse D (2006) Entrapped air bubbles in piezo-driven inkjet printing: Their effect on the droplet velocity. Phys Fluids 18(12):121511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2397015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chris Butcher (Canadian Center for Electron Microscopy, McMaster University) and Marcia Reid (McMaster Health Sciences) for sample preparation and training. The authors also thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for funding through the SENTINEL Bioactive Paper Network. We also thank the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation for Infrastructure funding to the Biointerfaces Institute. YL acknowledges funding from the China Scholarship Council (CSC). JDB holds the Canada Research Chair in Bioanalytical Chemistry and Biointerfaces. RP holds the Canada Research Chair in Interfacial Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to John D. Brennan or Robert H. Pelton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Dahhan, O., Filipe, C.D.M. et al. Optimizing piezoelectric inkjet printing of silica sols for biosensor production. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 87, 657–664 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4762-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4762-3

Keywords

Navigation