Skip to main content
Log in

Study of 99Tc and 129I measurement using 3MV Xi’an-AMS

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 3 MV AMS is completely unable to distinguish isobars within a gas ionization chamber for medium-heavy mass nuclides such as 99Tc and 129I. However, isobar suppression and elimination can be performed during the extraction stage in the ion source. Due to the limited energy in 3 MV AMS, 99Tc and 99Ru can’t be separated, so it does not show sufficient advantages compared to ICP-MS. Therefore, 99Tc analysis was rarely carried out using 3 MV or below AMS. In addition, 99Tc as an artificial nuclide is confronted with no stable isotope for normalization. The 129I was successfully analyzed by AMS due to the non-exitance of 129Xe. Xi’an-AMS is limited by hardware capabilities to only use a relatively inefficient + 5 charge state for measurement. In this work, the feasibility of 99Tc analysis by 3 MV Xi’an-AMS was studied, and it was determined that 93Nb molecules were used as the stable isotope for the normalization beam, carbides were used as the injected negative ions, and 93Nb was used as the pilot beam. The transmission efficiency of the whole machine was tuned and optimized. 99Tc correction with 99Ru was discussed, and the detection limit of 99Tc was estimated to be about ~ 1011 atoms in this preliminary work. Furthermore, the measurement of 129I3+ was established at Xi'an-AMS, the interferences in the measurement of + 3 charge state were analyzed, and the measurement of 129I3+ and 129I5+ was compared using real samples and process blank samples. Both of them were consistent within 1σ, but the total efficiency of the + 3 charge state is about 1.75 times higher than that of the + 5 charge state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wallner A, Forstner O, Golser R, Korschinek G, Kutschera W, Priller A, Steier P, Vockenhuber C (2010) Nucl Instrum Meth B 268:799–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen KW (1988) Nucl Instrum Meth B 35:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Tuniz, Bird, J.R., Fink, D., Herzog, H.G., Accelerator mass spectrometry: ultrasensitive analysis for global science, New York: CRC, (1998).

  4. Srncik M, Steier P, Wallner G (2011) J Environ Radioact 102:614–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Srncik M, Tims SG, De Cesare M, Fifield LK (2014) J Environ Radioact 132:108–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kappel S, Boulyga SF, Prohaska T (2012) J Environ Radioact 113:8–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciurapinski A, Parus J, Donohue D (2002) J Radioanal Nucl Ch 251:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Betti M, Tamborini G, Koch L (1999) Anal Chem 71:2616–2622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eigl R, Steier P, Sakata K, Sakaguchi A (2017) J Environ Radioact 169:70–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Casacuberta N, Christl M, Lachner J, van der Loeff MR, Masque P, Synal HA (2014) Geochim Cosmochim Ac 133:34–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakaguchi A, Kadokura A, Steier P, Takahashi Y, Shizuma K, Hoshi M, Nakakuki T, Yamamoto M (2012) Earth Planet Sci Lett 333:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winkler SR, Steier P, Carilli J (2012) Earth Planet Sci Lett 359:124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi K, Hou X, Roos P, Wu W (2012) Anal Chim Acta 709:1–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fifield LK, Carling RS, Cresswell RG, Hausladen PA, di Tada ML, Day JP (2000) Nucl Instrum Meth B 168:427–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wacker L, Fifield LK, Tims SG (2004) Nucl Instrum Meth B 223:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He M, Jiang S, Peng B, Ruan X, Dong K, Guan Y, Li S, Wu S, Qiu J, Yin X, Ding Y (2007) Nucl Instrum Meth B 259:708–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinto F, Busser C, Faestermann T, Hain K, Koll D, Korschinek G, Kraft S, Ludwig P, Plaschke M, Schäfer T, Geckeis H (2019) Anal Chem 91:4585–4591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cornett RJ, Zhao XL, Hou XL, Kieser WE (2019) Nucl Instrum Meth B 455:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao XL, Litherland AE (2010) Nucl Instrum Meth B 268:812–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Q (2015) Environmental utral-low level iodine-129 and plutonium analysis methods research by accelerator mass spectrometry. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen N (2018) Analysis method of iodine isotope in water samples and its application in environmental tracing. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang LY (2015) Speciation analysis and environmental tracer studies of 129I. Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xing S (2015) Trace application of long-lived radionuclides 239,240Pu and 129I in the environment. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang YY (2015) Investigation of 129I in vegetation samples from Northwest of China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hou XL, Zhou WJ, Chen N, Zhang L, Liu Q, Luo M, Fan Y, Liang W, Fu Y (2010) Anal Chem 82:7713–7721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomez-Guzman JM, Lopez-Gutierrez JM, Pinto-Gomez AR, Holm E (2012) Appl Radiat Isot 70:263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu YC, Zhou WJ, Cheng P, Zhang LY (2019) Nucl Instrum Meth B 438:162–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (B) (Grant No. XDB40000000), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Grant No. Y2021108), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975240).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Chong Fu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, YC., Zhang, LY., Bi, YT. et al. Study of 99Tc and 129I measurement using 3MV Xi’an-AMS. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 1253–1261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08757-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08757-5

Keywords

Navigation