Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural radioactivity of a copper–zinc mine with a production facility in Türkiye and radiological consequences of usage of the tailing as a concrete additive

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dose rates of an underground copper-zinc mine and the radioactivities of collected samples were measured using a surveymeter and a gamma-ray spectrometer. There was no significant difference found between mine dose rates and background radiation in the region. The average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in tailing samples were found to be 27%, 83%, and 71% higher than in ores, respectively. It was determined that a miner who worked in the mine for a year and was exposed to the natural radiation of the mine could be exposed to a radiation dose of less than 1 mSv. The annual radiation dose of a person living in a standard concrete room with a certain amount of tailing added to the concrete content was calculated to be 202.2 µSvy− 1. Using tailings as concrete additives can help reduce waste released into the environment and make better use of natural resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IAEA (2003) Extent of environmental contamination by naturally occurring radioactive material (norm) and technological options for mitigation, Technical Report Series No. 419. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  2. IAEA (2006) Assessing the Need for Radiation Protection Measures in Work Involving Minerals and Raw Materials. Vienna

  3. IAEA (2011) Exposure of the Public from Large Deposits of Mineral Residues. Vienna

  4. IAEA (2013) Management of NORM residues, IAEA-TECDOC-1712. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skipperud L, Strømman G, Yunusov M et al (2013) Environmental impact assessment of radionuclide and metal contamination at the former U sites Taboshar and Digmai, Tajikistan. J Environ Radioact 123:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.05.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borai EH, el Afifi EM, El-Din S AM (2017) Selective elimination of natural radionuclides during the processing of high grade monazite concentrates by caustic conversion method. Korean J Chem Eng 34:1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0350-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jirásek J, Matýsek D, Alexa P et al (2020) High specific activity of radium isotopes in baryte from the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Basin—an example of spontaneous mine water treatment. Minerals 10:103. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chałupnik S, Franus W, Wysocka M, Gzyl G (2013) Application of zeolites for radium removal from mine water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7900–7906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1877-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alnour IA, Wagiran H, Ibrahim N et al (2014) Gross alpha and gross beta activity in the products and by-product of amang tin tailings process. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3708-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho FP, Tufa MB, Oliveira JM, Malta M (2021) Radionuclides and radiation exposure in tantalite mining, Ethiopia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 81:648–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-021-00858-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Afifi EM, Shahr El-Din AM, Aglan RF et al (2017) Baseline evaluation for natural radioactivity level and radiological hazardous parameters associated with processing of high grade monazite. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 89:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.07.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arogunjo AM, Höllriegl V, Giussani A et al (2009) Uranium and thorium in soils, mineral sands, water and food samples in a tin mining area in Nigeria with elevated activity. J Environ Radioact 100:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leopold K, Michalik B, Wiegand J (2007) Availability of radium isotopes and heavy metals from scales and tailings of polish hard coal mining. J Environ Radioact 94:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MTA (2022) Copper. In: Mineral research and exploration general directorate. https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/metalik-madenler/bakir. Accessed 14 Jan 2022

  15. BMLRT (2021) Production of mineral raw materials of individual countries by minerals. In: World mining data, austrian federal ministry of agriculture, regions and tourism. https://www.world-mining-data.info/?World_Mining_Data___Data_Section. Accessed 20 Jan 2022

  16. Kırıs E, Baltas H (2021) Assessing pollution levels and health effects of heavy metals in sediments around Cayeli copper mine area, Rize, Turkey. Environ Forensics 22:372–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2020.1850572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kasowska D, Gediga K, Spiak Z (2018) Heavy metal and nutrient uptake in plants colonizing post-flotation copper tailings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:824–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0451-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rzymski P, Klimaszyk P, Marszelewski W et al (2017) The chemistry and toxicity of discharge waters from copper mine tailing impoundment in the valley of the Apuseni Mountains in Romania. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:21445–21458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9782-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. EPA (1999) Technologically Enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials in the southwestern copper belt of Arizona, Technical Report EPA 402-R-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC

  20. Nguyen DC, le Khanh P, Jodłowski P et al (2016) Natural radioactivity at the sin quyen iron-oxide-copper-gold deposit in north Vietnam. Acta Geophys 64:2305–2321. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Belyaeva O, Pyuskyulyan K, Movsisyan N et al (2019) Natural radioactivity in urban soils of mining centers in Armenia: dose rate and risk assessment. Chemosphere 225:859–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez Sánchez D, Prendes Alonso M (2000) Exposure to natural radiation in gold–copper mines located in areas with high levels of natural radiation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on high levels of natural radiation and radon areas: radiation dose and health effects (Abstract P1.3-239, p. 135). Munich

  23. Benvenuti M, Mascaro I, Corsini F et al (1997) Mine waste dumps and heavy metal pollution in abandoned mining district of Boccheggiano (Southern Tuscany, Italy). Environ Geol 30:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salonen V-P, Tuovinen N, Valpola S (2006) History of mine drainage impact on Lake Orijärvi Algal Communities, SW Finland. J Paleolimnol 35:289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-005-0483-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks SJ, Udachin V, Williamson BJ (2005) Impact of copper smelting on lakes in the southern Ural Mountains, Russia, inferred from chironomids. J Paleolimnol 33:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-004-3936-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andrade S, Moffett J, Correa JA (2006) Distribution of dissolved species and suspended particulate copper in an intertidal ecosystem affected by copper mine tailings in Northern Chile. Mar Chem 101:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2006.03.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ntengwe FW, Maseka KK (2006) The impact of effluents containing zinc and nickel metals on stream and river water bodies: the case of Chambishi and Mwambashi streams in Zambia. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 31:814–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ZHOU J-M, DANG Z, CAI M-F, LIU C-Q (2007) Soil heavy metal pollution around the Dabaoshan mine, Guangdong province, China. Pedosphere 17:588–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60069-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sridharan M, Madhavi TCh (2021) Investigating the influence of copper slag on the mechanical behaviour of concrete. Mater Today Proc 46:3225–3232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Shen W, Wu M et al (2020) Experimental study on the utilization of copper tailing as micronized sand to prepare high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater 244:118312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Onuaguluchi O, Eren Ö (2016) Reusing copper tailings in concrete: corrosion performance and socioeconomic implications for the Lefke-Xeros area of Cyprus. J Clean Prod 112:420–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Çayeli Bakır (2022) https://www.cayelibakir.com/en/corporate.asp. Accessed 20

  33. Alkan N, Alkan A, Akbaş U, Fisher A (2015) Metal pollution assessment in sediments of the southeastern Black Sea Coast of Turkey. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 24:290–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2015.950723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mani M, Altunışık A, Gedik K (2021) Bioaccumulation of trace elements and health risk predictions in edible tissues of the marsh frog. Biol Trace Elem Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-03017-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yilmaz E(2000) Çayeli Bakır Cevherinin Flotasyonunda Kullanılan Kimyasal Reaktiflerin Zenginleştirmeye Etkisi (The Effect of Chemical Reagents Used for Flotation of Cayeli Copper Ore on the Recovery)

  36. Nuclear Energy Research Institute-Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency. https://www.tenmak.gov.tr/en/#. Accessed 27 Jan 2022

  37. Gilmore GR (2008) Practical gamma-ray spectrometry, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. IAEA Reference Products for Environment and Trade. In: Sertified reference materials. https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/ReferenceMaterials/Pages/RefmatArchive.aspx. Accessed 28 Jan 2022

  39. Ağuş Y (2018) Gamma spectrometric method validation for the measurements of 40K and 137Cs in the milk powder. Süleyman Demirel Univ J Nat Appl Sci 22:493–498. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.25850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Parmaksız A (2020) Radiological assessment of the bauxite mining in Turkey and estimation of radiation dose contribution of the red mud as a concrete agent of the model room by using RESRAD-BUILD computer code. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326:1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07397-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. El-Taher A (2010) Gamma spectroscopic analysis and associated radiation hazards of building materials used in Egypt. Radiat Prot Dosim 138:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem 40:586–593. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. RESA (2022) Radiation early warning system network. https://www.ndk.org.tr/radyasyon-erken-uyari-sistemi-agi-resa. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  44. EURDEP (2022) European radiological data exchange platform. https://remap.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Simple.aspx. Accessed 2 Feb 2022

  45. Bochiolo M, Verdoya M, Chiozzi P, Pasquale V (2012) Radiometric surveying for the assessment of radiation dose and radon specific exhalation in underground environment. J Appl Geophy 83:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Walencik-Łata A, Szkliniarz K, Kisiel J et al (2022) Characteristics of natural background Radiation in the GIG experimental mine ‘Barbara’, Poland. Energies (Basel) 15:685. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Doyi I, Oppon OC, Glover ET et al (2013) Assessment of occupational radiation exposure in underground artisanal gold mines in Tongo, Upper East Region of Ghana. J Environ Radioact 126:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rana BK, Sahoo SK, Ravi PM, Tripathi RM (2014) Evaluation of occupational radiological exposures associated with a low ore grade underground uranium mine of Bagjata, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 301:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3123-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mokobia CE (2004) Background gamma terrestrial dose rate in nigerian functional coal mines. Radiat Prot Dosim 108:169–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tresnjo Z, Adrovic J, Hankic E (2017) Levels of radon activity concentration and gamma dose rate in air of coal mines in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Radon, InTech

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. IAEA (2014) Radiation Protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards-IAEA safety standards-general safety requirements part 3. Vienna

  52. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation-UNSCEAR 2008 report-volume I: sources report to the general assembly scientific Annexes A and B

  53. IAEA (2004) Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance. Safety standard series no. RS-G-1.7. IAEA

  54. Krieger R (1981) Radioactivity of construction materials. Betonwerk Fertigteil Technik 47:468–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys 48:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. European Commission (EC) (1999) Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials, radiation protection 112 official publications of the European communities. Luxembourg

  57. Turhan Ş, Kurnaz A, Karataşlı M (2022) Evaluation of natural radioactivity levels and potential radiological hazards of common building materials utilized in Mediterranean region. Turk Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:10575–10584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16505-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York-USA

  59. IAEA Safety Standards for protecting people and the environment GSGNoG-8 (2018) Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. Vienna

  60. Qureshi AA, Tariq S, Din KU et al (2014) Evaluation of excessive lifetime cancer risk due to natural radioactivity in the rivers sediments of Northern Pakistan. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, vol  21 no 1–3, publication 60

  62. WHO (World Health Organization) (2022) The global health observatory-life expectancy. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/life-expectancy-at-birth-(years). Accessed 16 Feb 2022

  63. Esmaeili J, Aslani H, Onuaguluchi O (2020) Reuse potentials of copper mine tailings in mortar and concrete composites. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao F, Zhao J, Liu H (2009) Autoclaved brick from low-silicon tailings. Constr Build Mater 23:538–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Huang X, Ni W, Cui W et al (2012) Preparation of autoclaved aerated concrete using copper tailings and blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 27:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gupta RC, Mehra P, Thomas BS (2017) Utilization of copper tailing in developing sustainable and durable concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04016274. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Saxena M, Gowri VS (2002) Innovative building materials. Civil Eng Constr Rev 15:64–50

    Google Scholar 

  68. Saxena M, Asokan P, Morchhale RK (2004) Durability characteristics of fired clay and clay fly ash bricks. In: Proceeding of the national seminar on recent trends in building materials, RRL, Bhopal. pp 328–303

  69. Sultan HA(1979) Stabilized copper mill tailings for highway construction Transp Res Rec, No. 734. In: 58th annual meeting of the transportation research board. Washington District of Columbia, United States

  70. Muleya F, Mulenga B, Zulu SL et al (2021) Investigating the suitability and cost-benefit of copper tailings as partial replacement of sand in concrete in Zambia: an exploratory study. J Eng Des Technol 19:828–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2020-0186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Argonne National Laboratory RESRAD-BUILD. Residual radioactive in buildings. https://resrad.evs.anl.gov/codes/resrad-build/. Accessed 23 Feb 2022

  72. Yu C, LePoire DJ, Cheng JJ et al (2003) User’s manual for RESRAD-BUILD Version 3. ANL/EAD/03 – 1

  73. Abdullahi S, Ismail AF, Yasir MS (2020) Radiological hazard analysis of Malaysia’s ceramic materials using generic and RESRAD-BUILD computer code approach. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 324:301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07070-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Pepin S (2018) Using RESRAD-BUILD to assess the external dose from the natural radioactivity of building materials. Constr Build Mater 168:1003–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ismail AF, Abdullahi S, Samat S, Yasir MS (2018) Radiological dose assessment of natural radioactivity in Malaysian tiles using RESRAD-BUILD computer code. Sains Malays 47:1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4705-18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. EU (2013) Council Directive 2013/59 Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Turkish Energy, Nuclear, and Mineral Research Agency and carried out as part of the research activities of the Nuclear Energy Research Institute’s Health Physics and Dosimetry Services Group and Radioactivity Measurement Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency, Nuclear Energy Research Institute, Atom Street, No:27, 06980, Kahramankazan, Ankara, Turkey

    Aydın Parmaksız, Yücel Özer Özkök & Yusuf Ağuş

Authors
  1. Aydın Parmaksız
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yücel Özer Özkök
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuf Ağuş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aydın Parmaksız.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no financial or non-financial interests in the subject matter or materials addressed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parmaksız, A., Özkök, Y.Ö. & Ağuş, Y. Natural radioactivity of a copper–zinc mine with a production facility in Türkiye and radiological consequences of usage of the tailing as a concrete additive. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 211–223 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08751-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08751-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation