Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficient removal of uranium from wastewater using amidoxime-carboxyl functional resin with large particle size

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing novel adsorbents for efficient U(VI) adsorption from wastewater is of great significance in both nuclear energy development and environmental protection. Herein, a novel functional resin (AO67/MA33-resin) with large particle size (100–200 μm) was controllably synthesized and employed for U(VI) elimination. The AO67/MA33-resin overcomes the shortcoming of small particle size of traditional adsorbents and shows strong antacid and high-temperature resistance stability and reusability. Meanwhile, the AO67/MA33-resin also exhibits excellent U(VI) removal ability including wide pH adaptability, fast adsorption kinetic, and high adsorption capacity. The adsorption mechanism was determined to involve chelation between amidoxime carboxyl functional groups and uranyl ions. A further application for U(VI) removal from real uranium mine wastewater was evaluated by dynamic column experiments. The present work indicated that the AO67/MA33-resin would be a promising adsorbent material for uranium removal from wastewater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brook BW, Alonso A, Meneley DA, Misak J, Blees T, van Erp JB (2014) Why nuclear energy is sustainable and has to be part of the energy mix. Sustain Mater Techno 1–2:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Go AW, Conag AT, Igdon RMB, Toledo AS, Malila JS (2019) Potentials of agricultural and agro-industrial crop residues for the displacement of fossil fuels: a Philippine context. Energy Strateg Rev 23:100–113

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qureshi MI, Rasli AM, Zaman K (2016) Energy crisis, greenhouse gas emissions and sectoral growth reforms: repairing the fabricated mosaic. J Clean Prod 112(5):3657–3666

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feng LD (2021) Research on nuclear energy and fossil fuels in China. IOP Conf Ser Earth: Environ Sci 621:012068

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desgranges L, Ma Y, Garcia P, Baldinozzi G, Siméone D, Fischer HE (2017) What is the actual local crystalline structure of uranium dioxide, UO2? A new perspective for the most used nuclear fuel. Inorg Chem 56(1):321–326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker RJ (2014) Uranium minerals and their relevance to long term storage of nuclear fuels. Coordin Chem Rev 266–267:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao N, Huang ZW, Liu HQ, Hou J, Liu XH (2019) Advances on the toxicity of uranium to different organisms. Chemosphere 237:124548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Y, Wang YX, Xie XJ (2014) Occurrence, behavior and distribution of high levels of uranium in shallow groundwater at Datong basin, northern China. Sci Total Environ 472:809–817

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 1. World health organization

  10. Cheng YX, He P, Dong FQ, Nie XQ, Ding CC, Wang S, Zhang Y, Liu HH, Zhou SP (2019) Polyamine and amidoxime groups modified bifunctional polyacrylonitrile-based ion exchange fibers for highly efficient extraction of U(VI) from real uranium mine water. Chem Eng J 367:198–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo WS, Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Watson D, Zhou JZ, Jardine PM, Gu BH (2009) Sequestering uranium and technetium through co-precipitation with aluminum in a contaminated acidic environment. Environ Sci Technol 43(19):7516–7522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kabay N, Demircioǧlu M, Yaylı S, Günay E, Yüksel M, Saǧlam M, Streat M (1998) Recovery of uranium from phosphoric acid solutions using chelating ion-exchange resins. Ind Eng Chem Res 37:1983–1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li ZJ, Huang ZW, Guo WL, Wang L, Zheng LR, Chai ZF, Shi WQ (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic removal of uranium(vi) from aqueous solution by magnetic TiO2 /Fe3O4 and its graphene composite. Environ Sci Technol 51(10):5666–5674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li WT, Liu YY, Bai Y, Wang J, Pang H (2020) Anchoring ZIF-67 particles on amidoximerized polyacrylonitrile fibers for radionuclide sequestration in wastewater and seawater. J Hazard Mater 395:122692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mishima K, Du XY, Miyamoto N, Kano N, Imaizumi H (2018) Experimental and theoretical studies on the adsorption mechanisms of uranium (VI) ions on chitosan. J Funct Biomater 9(3):49

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Satpathy A, Catalano JG, Giammar DE (2022) Reduction of U(VI) on chemically reduced montmorillonite and surface complexation modeling of adsorbed U(IV). Environ Sci Technol 56(7):4111–4120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu P, Wu HY, Yuan N, Liu YQ, Pan DQ, Wu WS (2017) Removal of U(VI) from aqueous solution using synthesized β-zeolite and its ethylenediamine derivative. J Mol Liq 234:40–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu KR, Chen CL, Xu MWC, Chen K, Tan XL, Wakeel M, Alharbi NS (2018) In situ carbothermal reduction synthesis of Fe nanocrystals embedded into N-doped carbon nanospheres for highly efficient U(VI) adsorption and reduction. Chem Eng J 331:395–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang PC, Wang L, Du K, Wang SY, Huang ZW, Yuan LY, Li ZJ, Wang HQ, Zheng LR, Chai ZF, Shi WQ (2020) Effective removal of U(VI) and Eu(III) by carboxyl functionalized MXene nanosheets. J Hazard Mater 396:122731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao J, Liu P, Xie Y, Zhang Y (2021) Metal oxide aerogels: Preparation and application for the uranium removal from aqueous solution. Sci Total Environ 768:144212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao J, Chen YT, Xu JB (2014) Plasma grafting montmorillonite/iron oxide composite with β-cyclodextrin and its application for high-efficient decontamination of U(VI). J Ind Eng Chem 20(5):2830–2839

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo BC, Yuan LY, Chai ZF, Shi WQ, Tang Q (2016) U(VI) capture from aqueous solution by highly porous and stable MOFs: UiO-66 and its amine derivative. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:269–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao XQ, Yao XB, Lu SS, Wang MM (2015) Efficient removal of radionuclide U(VI) from aqueous solutions by using graphene oxide nanosheets. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:245–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen M, Liu T, Zhang X, Zhang R, Tang S, Yuan Y, Xie Z, Liu Y, Wang H, Fedorovich KV, Wang N (2021) Photoinduced enhancement of uranium extraction from seawater by MOF/Black phosphorus quantum dots heterojunction anchored on cellulose nanofiber aerogel. Adv Funct Mater 31:2100106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cui HM, Feng XJ, Shi JS, Liu WG, Yan NF, Rao GH, Wang W (2020) A facile process for enhanced rare earth elements separation from dilute solutions using N, N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-diglycolamide grafted polymer resin. Sep Purif Technol 234:116096

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadeek SA, El-Sayed MA, Amine MM, Abd El-Magied MO (2013) A chelating resin containing trihydroxybenzoic acid as the functional group: synthesis and adsorption behavior for Th(IV) and U(VI) ions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:1299–1306

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang MJ, Liu HZ, Zeng MQ, Liu YC (2022) Preparation of PAMAM dendrimer modified amidoxime chelating resin and its adsorption for U(VI) in aqueous. Inorg Chem Commun 144:109909

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dai Y, Jin JY, Zhou LM, Li TQ, Li Z, Liu ZR, Huang GL, Adesina AA (2016) Preparation of hollow SiO2 microspheres functionalized with amidoxime groups for highly efficient adsorption of U(VI) from aqueous solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:2029–2203

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu JM, Liu T, Wang CC, Yin XH, Xiong ZH (2017) Introduction of amidoxime groups into metal-organic frameworks to synthesize MIL-53(Al)-AO for enhanced U(VI) sorption. J Mol Liq 242:531–536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shao DD, Wang XL, Ren XM, Hu S, Wen J, Tan ZY, Xiong J, Asiri AM, Marwani HM (2018) Polyamidoxime functionalized with phosphate groups by plasma technique for effective U(VI) adsorption. J Ind Eng Chem 67:380–387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang B, Guo XJ, Xie SY, Liu XY, Ling CJ, Ma HJ, Yu M, Li JY (2016) Synergistic nanofibrous adsorbent for uranium extraction from seawater. RSC Adv 6:81995–82005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmad M, Wu F, Cui YH, Zhang QY, Zhang BL (2020) Preparation of novel bifunctional magnetic tubular nanofibers and their application in efficient and irreversible uranium trap from aqueous solution. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:7825–7838

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Da’na E (2017) Adsorption of heavy metals on functionalized-mesoporous silica: a review. Micropor Mesopor Mater 247:145–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao R, Shi XY, Ma TT, Rong HZ, Wang ZY, Cui FC, Zhu GS, Wang C (2021) Constructing mesoporous adsorption channels and MOF-polymer interfaces in electrospun composite fibers for effective removal of emerging organic contaminants. ACS Appl Mater Interf 13:755–764

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wen R, Li Y, Zhang MC, Guo XH, Li X, Li XF, Han J, Hu S, Tan W, Ma LJ, Li SJ (2018) Graphene-synergized 2D covalent organic framework for adsorption: a mutual promotion strategy to achieve stabilization and functionalization simultaneously. J Hazard Mater 358:273–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Govindarajan M, Karabacak M, Suvitha A, Periandy S (2012) FT-IR, FT-raman, ab initio, HF and DFT studies, NBO, HOMO-LUMO and electronic structure calculations on 4-chloro-3-nitrotoluene. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 89:137–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gao QH, Hu JT, Li R, Xing Z, Xu L, Wang MH, Guo XJ, Wu GZ (2016) Radiation synthesis of a new amidoximated UHMWPE fibrous adsorbent with high adsorption selectivity for uranium over vanadium in simulated seawater. Radiat Phys Chem 122:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  38. Groetsch T, Maghe M, Rana R, Hess R, Nunna S, Herron J, Buckmaster D, Creighton C, Varley RJ (2021) Gas emission study of the polyacrylonitrile-based continuous pilot-scale carbon fiber manufacturing process. Ind Eng Chem Res 60:17379–17389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu MT, Ao JX, Ma L, Kong DX, Qi SM, Zhang P, Xu G, Wu MH, Ma HJ (2022) Uranium removal from waste water of the tailings with functional recycled plastic membrane. Sep Purif Technol 287:120572

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng H, Zhou L, Liu Z, Le Z, Ouyang J, Huang G, Shehzad H (2019) Functionalization of mesoporous Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres for highly efficient U(VI) adsorption. Micropor Mesopor Mater 279:316–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yuan F, Wu CF, Cai YW, Zhang LJ, Wang JQ, Chen LH, Wang XK, Yang ST, Wang SA (2017) Synthesis of phytic acid-decorated titanate nanotubes for high efficient and high selective removal of U(VI). Chem Eng J 322:353–365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tong J, Yang JQ, Zhang LL, Liu TH, Peng CY, Ni XF, Dong TH, Mocilac P, Shi KL, Hou XL (2022) Efficient removal of Se-79 from highly acidic solution using SiO2 particles functionalised with iron hydroxide. Chem Eng J 446:137387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Alharthi S (2021) Separation of thorium(IV) from aquatic media using magnetic ferrite nanoparticles. Radiochim Acta 109:823–833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang JQ, Shi KL, Wu F, Tong J, Su Y, Liu TH, He JG, Mocilac P, Hou XL, Wu WS, Shi WQ (2022) Technetium-99 decontamination from radioactive wastewater by modified bentonite: batch, column experiment and mechanism investigation. Chem Eng J 428:131333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Yen CH, Lien HL, Chung JS, Yeh HD (2017) Adsorption of precious metals in water by dendrimer modified magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 322:215–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li P, Wang JJ, Wang Y, Liang JJ, He BH, Pan DQ, Fan QH, Wang XK (2019) Photoconversion of U(VI) by TiO2: an efficient strategy for seawater uranium extraction. Chem Eng J 365:231–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. He NN, Li H, Cheng C, Dong H, Lu XR, Wen J, Wang XL (2020) Enhanced marine applicability of adsorbent for uranium via synergy of hyperbranched poly(amido amine) and amidoxime groups. Chem Eng J 395:125162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Lin ZW, Zhang HS, Liu Q, Yu J, Liu JY, Chen RR, Zhu JH, Wang J (2021) Anti-bacterial and super-hydrophilic bamboo charcoal with amidoxime modified for efficient and selective uranium extraction from seawater. J Colloid Interf Sci 598:455–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu X, Wu J, Zhang S, Ding C, Sheng G, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Li J, Song Y (2019) Amidoxime-functionalized hollow carbon spheres for efficient removal of uranium from wastewater. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:10800–10807

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22061132004, U21A20442, 22106059, 21771093), Science and Technology Projects of Gansu Province (21JR1RA265), Gansu Industrial Support Plan of colleges and Universities (2022CYZC-06) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. lzujbky-2022-pd11, lzujbky-2022-kb13) are gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Frontier Science Center for Rare Isotopes, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People’s Republic of China

    Fuan Lei, Tonghuan Liu, Keliang Shi, Wangsuo Wu, Xiaoqing Gao & Junqiang Yang

  2. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, People’s Republic of China

    Fuan Lei, Weibo Zhang, Yun Zhou, Ningyuan Zhou, Tonghuan Liu, Keliang Shi, Wangsuo Wu, Xiaoqing Gao & Junqiang Yang

Authors
  1. Fuan Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weibo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ningyuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tonghuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Keliang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wangsuo Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaoqing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Junqiang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junqiang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, F., Zhang, W., Zhou, Y. et al. Efficient removal of uranium from wastewater using amidoxime-carboxyl functional resin with large particle size. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 1135–1147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08711-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08711-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation