Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the suitability of clay rock sites for geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in the Tamusu area, Inner Mongolia, China

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geology of Tamusu site candidate for high-level radioactive waste (HLW) in Inner Mongolia in China was characterized by large size, moderate burial, good integrity, strong nuclide adsorption, very low permeability, high stress strength, and a relatively stable regional tectonic environment. An evaluation system of QCHLW for the suitability of clay rock strata for HLW geological disposal was proposed and applied to Tamusu site candidate. The result shows that the geological factors meet the requirements of China for a clay rock site for an HLW geological repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. Pan, ZQ, Qian QH (2009) Strategy research on high-level radioactive waste geological disposal. Publishing House of Atomic Energy, Beijing pp 15–17 in Chinese

  2. IAEA (2003) Scientific and technical basis for the geological disposal of radioactive wastes. IAEA Technical Rapport-413, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  3. Nuclear Energy Agency (2012) Methods for safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste:outcomes of the NEA MeSA initiative. Radioactive Waste Manage 149–163

  4. Witherspoon PA (2001) Geological problems in radioactive waste isolation: The 3rd World WideReview (LBNL-38915). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California

  5. Zhang CL, Wang J, Su K (2006) Concepts and tests for disposal of radioactive waste in deep geological formations. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(4):750–767

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu XD, Liu PH (2012) Study on the basic characteristics of clay rock in Tamusi area of Bayingobi basin. In: Proceedings of the fourth symposium on underground waste disposal. China Society of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 64–72

  7. The National Standards Compilation Group of Peoples Republic of China (2014) GB/T 50218–2014 Standard for engineering classification of rock masses. China Planning Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech Rock Eng 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang CX, Liu XD, Liu PH (2008) Research situation of claystone as hosting rock for high level radioactive waste geological disposal. World Nucl Geosci 25(02):98–103 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li HH, Zhao SW, Li P, Jia ML, Liu W, Mao L, Yang ZT, An HX (2015) Safety functions and characteristics of a geologic disposal system. Radiat Protect Bull 35(05):15–20 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swift PN (2017) Geological repository systems for safe disposal of spent nuclear fuels and radioactive waste, 2nd Edition. pp 451–473, Woodhead Publishing

  13. Martin M, Andreas G, Paul M, Georges V, Patrick L, Jacques D (2008) Transferability of geoscientific information from various sources (study sites, underground rock laboratories, natural analogues) to support safety cases forradioactive waste repositories in argillaceous formations. Phys Chem Earth 33:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Nucci MR, Brunnengräber A, Isidoro Losada AM (2017) From the “right to know” to the “right to object” and “decide”. A comparative perspective on participation in siting procedures for high level radioactive waste repositories. Prog Nucl Energy 100:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bossart P, Bernier F, Birkholzer J, Bruggeman C, Connolly P, Dewonck S, Fukaya M, Herfort M, Jensen M, Matray JM, Mayor JC, Moeri A, Oyama T, Schuster K, Shigeta N, Vietor T, Wieczorek K (2017) Mont Terri rock laboratory, 20 years of research: introduction, site characteristics and overview of experiments. Swiss J Geosci 110:3–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li SZ (2018) Geological characteristics and comprehensive evaluation of clay preselected section of Bayingebi formation in Ingejing depression inner Mongolia [D]. East China University of Technology in Chinese

  17. Newsam JM (1989) The zeolite cage structure. Science 231:1093–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng WL, Huang SJ, Huang PP, Zou ML, Wu M (2009) Sandstone reservoir characteristics of Taiyuan formation in northeastern Ordos basin. Lithol Reserv 21(01):89–93 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu SF, Cui H, Jia Y, Zhu XM, Tong H, Ma LC (2020) Occurrence, composition, and origin of analcime in sedimentary rocks of non-marine petroliferous basins in China. Marine Pet Geol 113:104164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh H, Goel RK (1999) Rock mass classification. a practical approach in civil engineering. pp 17–117, Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford

  21. Aikas K, Riekkola R (2000) Locating of the high level waste repository. Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Helsinki

  22. Roshoff K, Lanaro F, Jing L (2002) Strategy for a rock mechanics site descriptive model: development and testing of the empirical approach. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co(SKB), Stockholm

  23. Hagros A (2006) host rock classification(HRC) system for nuclear waste disposal in crystalline bedrock. University of Helsinki, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mcewen T, Aro S, Kosunen P, Mattila J (2012) Rock suitability classification RSC 2012. Posiva Oy, Olkiluo

  25. Chen L, Wang J, Zong ZH, Liu J, Su R, Guo YH, Jin YX, Chen WM, Ji RL, Zhao HG, Wang XY, Tian X, Luo H, Zhang M (2015) A new rock mass classification system Q HLW for high-level radioactive waste disposal. Eng Geol 190:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen L, Wang J, Liu J, Liu YH (2018) A new system of rock suitability classification QHLW for high-level radioactive waste disposal and its application in the selection of URL site in China. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 37(06):1385–1394 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Eng Geol 1(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Swiss Federal Office of Energy (2008) Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories Conceptual Part

  29. Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min ScienceDirect 39:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gonzalez de Vallejo LI (2003) SRC rock mass classification of tunnels under high tectonic stress excavated in weak rocks. Eng Geol 69:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gonzalez de Vallejo LI, Hijazo T (2008) A new method of estimating theratiobetween in situ rock stresses and tectonics based on empirical and probabilistic analyses. Eng Geol 101:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hijazo T, Gonzalez de Vallejo LI (2012) In-situ stress amplification due to geological factors in tunnels: the case of Pajares tunnels. Spain Eng Geol 137:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu YS, Li Z, Liang JZ (2020) Prediction of rockburst proneness of surrounding rock in iron mine based on empirical method. Chin J Undergr Space Eng 16(02):591–598 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miao SJ, Cai MF, Guo QF, Huang ZJ (2016) Rock burst prediction based on in-situ stress and energy accumulation theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanaka H, Fujimoto K, Ohtani T, Ito H (2001) Structural and chemical characterization of shear zones in the freshly activated Nojima fault, Awaji Island, southwest Japan. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 106(B5):8789–8881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen JY, Yang XS, Ma SL, Spiers CJ (2013) Mass removal and clay mineral dehydration/rehydration in carbonate-rich surface exposures of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake fault: Geochemical evidence and implications for fault zone evolution and coseismic slip. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118(2):474–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sibson RH (1975) Seismic pumping: A hydrothermal fluid transport mechanism. J Geol Soc 131(6):653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sinisi R, Petrullo AV, Agosta F, Paternoster M, Belviso C, Grassa F (2016) Contrasting fault fluids along high-angle faults:a case study from Southern Apennines(Italy). Tectonophysics 69:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanaori Y, Tanaka K, Miyakoshi K (1984) Further studies on the use of guartz grains from fauit gouges of establish the age of faulting. Eng Geol 21:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kanaori Y (1986) A SEM cathodoluminescence study of quartz in mildly deformed granite from the region of the Atotsugawa fault, central Japan. Tectonophysics 131(1–2):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang ZE (1985) A new method to determine the relative age of active fault activity is the method to determine the micro structure of quartz grains in fault gouge. Seismic Geol Transl 01:10–14 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zheng GD, Fu BH, Takahashi Y, Miyahara M, Kuno A, Matsuo M, Miyashita Y (2008) Iron speciation in fault gouge from the Ushikubi fault zone central Japan. Hyperfine Interact 186(1–3):39–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo C, Li GR, Wang C, Zhang WQ, Liu S, Gong ZJ, Liu XD (2018) Distribution of iron species in faults and its indication of fault activity in Tamusu area. Inner Mong Geol Rev 64(06):1365–1378 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Distinguin M, Lavanchy JM (2007) Determination of hydraulic properties of the Callovo-Oxfordian argillite at the Bure site: Synthesis of the results obtained in deep boreholes using several in situ investigation techniques. Phys Chem Earth 32:379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yven B, Sammartino S, Geroud Y, Homand F, Villieras F (2007) Mineralogy, texture and porosity of Callovo-Oxfordian argillites of the Meuse/Haute-Marne region (eastern Paris Basin). Bull Soc Geol Fr 178:73–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express sincere thanks to Dr. Shuiwei Zhao from China Institute for Radiation Protection for his helpful discussion on criterion analysis. Prof. Miles Silbeman from University of Texas at El Paso is highly acknowledged for his help on grammar correction and professional comments that helps improving this paper to a higher level. This work was funded by the National Defense science, Technology and Industry Bureau project (NO. [2014]1587), Independent Fund Projects from the State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment (No. Z1904), and Special funds for local science and technology development guided by the central government (No. 2018ZDB40001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangrong Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, H., Rao, Z., Li, G. et al. Evaluation of the suitability of clay rock sites for geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in the Tamusu area, Inner Mongolia, China. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 47–61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08654-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08654-x

Keywords

Navigation