Skip to main content
Log in

Qualitative assessment of uranium ore concentrates and related materials using scanning electron microscopy

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated the morphology of uranium compounds produced under controlled conditions at the laboratory scale, but it is unclear whether the morphological characteristics of these materials persist in commercially produced uranium ore concentrates (UOCs). To assess the morphology in “real-world” UOCs, we qualitatively evaluated the morphological profile of secondary electron images from over 100 commercial UOCs using a previously published lexicon. We observe differences between samples with differing chemical composition and samples with similar chemical composition and differing provenance. This work contextualizes morphology for commercially produced UOCs and will provide a basis for future machine learning efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal SK (2006) Nuclear forensics: what, why and how. Curr Sci 110:782–791

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kristo MJ, Tumey SJ (2013) The state of nuclear forensics. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 294:656–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin DHM, Manara D, Varga Z, Berlizov A, Fanghänel T, Mayer K (2013) Applicability of Raman spectroscopy as a tool in nuclear forensics for analysis of uranium ore concentrates. Radiochim Acta 101:779–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Varga Z, Öztürk B, Meppen M, Mayer K, Wallenius M, Apostolidis C (2011) Characterization and classification of uranium ore concentrates (yellow cakes) using infrared spectrometry. Radiochim Acta 99:807–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manna S, Karthik P, Mukherjee A, Banerjee J, Roy SB, Joshi JB (2012) Study of calcinations of ammonium diuranate at different temperatures. J Nucl Mater 426:229–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manna S, Basak C, Thakkar UR, Thakur S, Roy SB, Joshi JB (2016) Study on effect of process parameters and mixing on morphology of ammonium diuranate. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 310:287–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tamasi AL, Cash LJ, Tyler Mullen W, Ross AR, Ruggiero CE, Scott BL, Wilkerson MP (2016) Comparison of morphologies of a uranyl peroxide precursor and calcination products. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 309:827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Klunder GL, Plaue JW, Spackman PE, Grant PM, Lindvall RE, Hutcheon ID (2013) Application of visible/near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to uranium ore concentrates for nuclear forensic analysis and attribution. Appl Spectrosc 67:1049–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moody KJ, Grant PM, Hutcheon ID (2005) Nuclear forensic analysis. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer K, Wallenius M, Ray I (2005) Nuclear forensics—a methodology providing clues on the origin of illicitly trafficked nuclear materials. Analyst 130:433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tamasi AL, Cash LJ, Mullen WT, Pugmire AL, Ross AR, Ruggiero CE, Scott BL, Wagner GL, Walensky JR, Wilkerson MP (2017) Morphology of U3O8 materials following storage under controlled conditions of temperature and relative humidity. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwerdt IJ, Olsen A, Lusk R, Heffernan S, Klosterman M, Collins B, Martinson S, Kirkham T, McDonald LW IV (2018) Nuclear forensics investigation of morphological signatures in the thermal decomposition of uranyl peroxide. Talanta 176:284–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreev EI, Glavin KV, Ivanov AV, Malovik VV, Martynov VV, Panov VS (2009) Some results uranium dioxide powder structure investigation. Russ J Non-Ferr Met 50:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen AM, Richards B, Schwerdt I, Heffernan S, Lusk R, Smith B, Jurrus E, Ruggiero C, McDonald LW IV (2017) Quantifying morphological features of α-U3O8 with image analysis for nuclear forensics. Anal Chem 89:3177–3183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Girard M, Hagen A, Schwerdt I, Gaumer M, McDonald LW IV, Hodas N, Jurrus E (2021) Uranium oxide synthetic pathway discernment through unsupervised morphological analysis. J Nucl Mater 552:152983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ly C, Olsen AM, Schwerdt IJ, Porter R, Sentz K, McDonald LW IV, Tasdizen T (2019) A new approach for quantifying morphological features of U3O8 for nuclear forensics using a deep learning model. J Nucl Mater 517:128–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott EC, Brenkmann A, Galbraith C, Ong J, Schwerdt IJ, Albrecht BD, Tasdizen T, McDonald LW IV (2019) Dependence of UO2 surface morphology on processing history within a single synthetic route. Radiochim Acta 107:1121–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamasi AL, Cash LJ, Eley C, Porter RB, Pugmire DL, Ross AR, Ruggiero CE, Tandon L, Wagner GL, Walensky JR, Wall AD, Wilkerson MP (2016) A lexicon for consistent description of material images for nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1611–1619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bickley, AA (2022) Application of artificial intelligence methods to microscopic particle analysis. Twelfth International Conference on Methods and Applications of Radioanalytical Chemistry (American Nuclear Society), April 3 - 8, 2022

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mike Sharp and Sarah Roberts for their efforts in sample preparation and pXRD analysis, respectively. This work was performed with support from the Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DOD-DTRA) Nuclear Science and Security Summer Internship Program (NS3IP) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Seaborg Institute. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. LLNL-JRNL-833247.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meena Said.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 821 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Said, M., Marks, N.E., Dai, Z. et al. Qualitative assessment of uranium ore concentrates and related materials using scanning electron microscopy. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 5053–5060 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08605-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08605-6

Keywords

Navigation