Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of AG1-x8 to separate radionuclides in an irradiated sample

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequential separation methods are key for rapid determination of multiple radionuclides. Seven different activation and fission products were isolated by two different sized anion exchange columns after a UTEVA/ TRU double stack. First, a 6 mL column of AG1-x8 separated Cd, Zn, Co, and Ir. The Cd recoveries were quantitative, with a decontamination factor of 106 from 132Te, a fission product interferent. Next, a 2 mL AG1-x8 column further separated the Fe/Ga/Te fraction from the first column. Ascorbic acid was used to control redox conditions, allowing for separation of Fe, Ga, and Te. With the use of two anion exchange columns, seven elements can be rapidly separated from a mixed activation/ fission product sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzales E, Garcia S, Mahan C, Hang W (2005) Evaluation of mass spectrometry and radiation detection for the analysis of radionuclides. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:457–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morley SM, Seiner B, Finn E, Greenwood L, Smith SC, Gregory S, Haney M, Lucas D, Arrigo L, Beacham T (2015) Integrated separation scheme for measuring a suite of fission and activation products from a fresh mixed fission and activation product sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang J, Davies A, Arrigo L, Friese J, Seiner BN, Greenwood L, Finch Z (2021) Analysis of 161Tb by radiochemical separation and liquid scintillation counting. Appl Radiat Isot 170:107298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle J (2011) Nuclear safeguards, security and nonproliferation: achieving security with technology and policy. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols A, Verpelli M, and Aldama D (2008) Handbook of nuclear data for safeguards: database extensions, August 2008. IAEA

  6. Seiner BN, King AR, Finn E, Greenwood LR, Metz LA, Friese J, Marsden O, Davies AV, Scivier P (2016) Fission product analysis of HEU irradiated within a boron carbide capsule: comparison of detection methodology at PNNL and AWE. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1729–1734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dry DE, Bauer E, Petersen LA (2005) Rapid separation of fresh fission products. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:19–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roach BD, Fenske EK, Glasgow DC, Partridge JD, Keever TJ, Giaquinto JM (2019) Rapid concentration and isotopic measurements of ultra-trace 235U fission products with comparison to an ORIGEN isotope depletion model. Talanta 205:120079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McAlister DR and Horwitz EP (2011) Chromatographic generator systems for the actinides and natural decay series elements.

  10. Michel H, Gasparro J, Barci-Funel G, Dalmasso J, Ardisson G, Sharovarov G (1999) Radioanalytical determination of actinides and fission products in Belarus soils. Talanta 48:821–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Douglas M, Friese J, Greenwood L, Farmer O, Thomas M, Maiti T, Finn E, Garofoli S, Gassman P, Huff M (2009) Separation and quantification of chemically diverse analytes in neutron irradiated fissile materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:63–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arrigo L, Herman S, and Arnold E (2020) Flowsheet Improvements FY19 Results. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

  13. Korkisch J (1988) CRC handbook of ion exchange resins. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faris JP (1978) Separation of metal ions by anion exchange in mixtures of hydrochloric acid and hydrofluoric acid. Argonne National Lab., IL (USA). p. Medium: ED; Size: Pages: 67.

  15. Walton HF (1965) Ion exchange in analytical chemistry. ACS Publications.

  16. Nelson F, Rush RM, Kraus KA (1960) Anion-exchange studies. XXVII. Adsorbability of a number of elements in HCl-HF solutions1, 2. J Am Chem Soc 82:339–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faris JP and Buchanan RF (1964) Anion exchange characteristics of the elements in nitric acid and nitrate solutions and application in trace element analysis. Argonne National Lab., Ill. p. Medium: ED; Size: Pages: 29.

  18. Kraus KA, Nelson F, Smith GW (1954) Anion exchange studies. IX. Adsorbability of a number of metals in hydrochloric acid solutions. J Phys Chem 58:11–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao GG, Rao VN (1955) Ascorbic acid as a reducing agent in quantitative analysis. Fresenius’ Zeitschrift Anal Chem 147:338–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Borsook H, Keighley G (1933) Oxidation-reduction potential of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19:875–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haynes WM, Lide DR, Bruno TJ (2016) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Bouroushian M (2010) Electrochemistry of the Chalcogens. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Matters. We would like to thank the Radiological Processing Laboratory (RPL) service center at PNNL for gamma emission analysis data. PNNL is operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL0-1830. PNNL draws on signature capabilities in chemistry, earth sciences, and data analytics to advance scientific discovery and create solutions to the nation's toughest challenges in energy resiliency and national security.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Staci Herman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herman, S., Arrigo, L.M., Arnold, E. et al. Evaluation of AG1-x8 to separate radionuclides in an irradiated sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 5107–5112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08601-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08601-w

Keywords

Navigation