Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of secondary solvent on the sample load capacity of a newly designed scintillation cocktail

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper describes the influence of secondary organic solvents on the performance of a newly designed scintillation cocktail. The work mainly focuses on the sample load capacity of the scintillation cocktail in connection with the solvent component to be able to accept the largest possible volume of different types of samples, especially aqueous ones. Previous research was focused on the ideal composition of the detergent component, which has a major impact on sample load capacity and new primary phosphors for use in liquid scintillation. However, the solvent component also has a significant impact on sample load capacity. Individual properties characterizing the performance of the scintillation cocktail were tested namely detection efficiency, alpha/beta discrimination ability, spillover effect, FOM, and sample load capacity. The resulting scintillation cocktail was compared to selected commercially available scintillation cocktails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kallmann H(1950) Scintillation counting with solutions [11].Phys. Rev.78

  2. Reynolds GT, Harrison FB, Salvini G(1950) Liquid scintillation counters [28].Phys. Rev.78

  3. Broda R, Cassette P, Kossert K (2007) Radionuclide metrology using liquid scintillation counting. Metrologia 44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/44/4/S06

  4. Hou X(2018) Liquid scintillation counting for determination of radionuclides in environmental and nuclear application.J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.318

  5. L’Annunziata MF, Tarancón A, Bagán H, García JF (2020) Liquid scintillation analysis: principles and practice. Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis, pp. 575–801. Academic press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814397-1.00006-6

  6. Gibson JAB (1971) Liquid Scintillation Counting as an Absolute Method. Liquid scintillation counting vol, vol 2. Heyden and Son, London, UK, pp 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lombardi P, Ranucci G, Ortica F, Romani A (2013) Decay time and pulse shape discrimination of liquid scintillators based on novel solvents. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip 701. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.10.061

  8. Thomson J, Temple S (2020) Sample preparation techniques for liquid scintillation analysis. In: Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis: Volume 1: Radiation Physics and Detectors, pp. 803–860. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814397-1.00007-8

  9. Kaptanoglu T, Callaghan EJ, Yeh M, Orebi Gann GD (2022) Cherenkov and scintillation separation in water-based liquid scintillator using an LAPPDTM. Eur Phys J C 82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10087-5

  10. Boos EF, Magid J, Bruun S, Jørgensen NOG (2022) Liquid scintillation counting can underestimate 14 C-activity of 14CO2 trapped in NaOH. Soil Biol Biochem 166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108576

  11. Horrocks D (ed) (2012) Applications of liquid scintillation counting. Elsevier

  12. Bush ET (1963) General Applicability of the Channels Ratio Method of Measuring Liquid Scintillation Counting Efficiencies. Anal Chem 35(8):1024–1029. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60201a032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook GT, Anderson R (1991) The determination of 241Pu by liquid scintillation spectrometry using the Packard 2250CA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem Lett 154(5):319–330. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02165488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verrezen F, Loots H, Hurtgen C (2008) A performance comparison of nine selected liquid scintillation cocktails. Appl Radiat Isot 66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.050

  15. Wiel JT, Hegge T (1991) Advances in scintillation cocktails. Liquid scintillation counting and organic scintillators, first edn. Lewis, Michigan, pp 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aqualight HIDEX, Aqualight+ AB (2021) MaxiLight + Cocktails for LSC. https://hidex.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HIDEX-Cocktails-1.pdf. Accessed 22

  17. Perkin Elmer - MSDS Ultima Gold XR (2021) https://www.perkinelmer.com/Content/MSDSDatabase/MSDS_6013119_Ultima_Gold_XR_(GB).pdf. Accessed 22

  18. Rajchl E, Janda J, Sedlačík M (2021) Optimization of composition of water accepting scintillation cocktail. J Radioanalytical Nuclear Chem Doi:. doi.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08386-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Rajchl.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajchl, E., Janda, J. Effect of secondary solvent on the sample load capacity of a newly designed scintillation cocktail. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 1445–1451 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08563-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08563-z

Keywords

Navigation