Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Glycolate in Radioactive Waste by Ion Chromatography (IC) and Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (H NMR)

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In preparation for implementing the Nitric-Glycolic (NG) acid flowsheet for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS), analytical methods for determining glycolate at low concentration, below 20 mg/L in radioactive samples, were developed to support system management and safety. To accommodate the wide range of LWS matrix conditions, two alternative methods were developed, refined, and demonstrated for glycolate analysis in radioactive waste samples: ion chromatography (IC) and a proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H NMR). Investigators validated IC and H NMR methods for glycolate analysis, defined the range of applicability, and demonstrated key supporting analytical protocols. The deployed IC method is applicable in low to moderate ionic strength samples and requires sample pretreatment using a Dionex OnGuard II H+ cartridge. The deployed H NMR method is more labor intensive but provides options for a broader range of matrices. Based on the results, high quality glycolate analysis of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) condensate in Tank 22 is feasible by IC down to approximately 12 mg/L. Using H NMR, glycolate may be determined to 8 mg/L or lower depending on the run time with the potential for broader applicability of the method to higher ionic strength conditions in other tanks of the SRS LWS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams M, Jantzen C, Burket P (2016) Corrosion Testing of Monofrax K-3 Refractory in Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Alternative Reductant Feeds. Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC SRNL-STI-2016-00030.

  2. Lambert D, Williams M, Brandenburg C, Luther M, Newell J, Woodham W (2016) Sludge Batch 9 Simulant Runs Using the Nitric-Glycolic Acid Flowsheet. Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC SRNL-STI-2016-00319; SRNL.

  3. Woodham W (2020) Calculation of Glycolate Concentration Factors Across the 242-25H (3H) Evaporator System. Savannah River Site. Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2020-00385.

  4. White T, DiPrete D, Fondeur F (2020) Glycolate Analysis in Tank 22: Developing and Testing Analytical Methods for the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System. Savannah River Site. Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2019-000712

  5. White T, DiPrete D, Fondeur F, Coleman C, Looney B (2021) Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (H NMR) of Glycolate in Real Waste: Developing and Testing Analytical Methods for the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System. Savannah River Site. Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2021-00020

  6. Caligiani A, Acquotti D, Palla G, Bocchi V (2007) Identification and quantification of the main organic components of vinegars by high resolution H NMR spectroscopy. Anal Chem Acta 585:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Figueiredo I, Pereira N, Efraim P, Garcia N, Rodrigues N, Marsaioli J (2006) a rapid method to monitor organic acids during cupuassu (Theobroma Grandiflorum Spreng) Processing. J Agric Food Chem 54:4102–4106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratanapariyanuch K, Shen J, Jia Y, Tyler R, Shim Y, Reaney M (2011) Rapid NMR Method for the Quantification of Organic Compounds in Thin Stillage. J Agric Food Chem 59:10454–10460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajabzadeh M (2012) Determination of Unknown Concentration of Sodium Acetate Using the Method of Standard Addition and Proton HMR: An Experiment for the Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Laboratory. J Chem Educ 89:1454–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu M, Mao X, Ye C, Huan H, Nicholson J, Lindon C (1998) Improved WATERGATE pulse sequence for solvent suppression in NMR Spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 132(1):125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguilar J, Kenwright S (2016) Robust NMR water signal suppression for demanding analytical applications. Analyst 141:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor-Pashow K, Analysis of Harrell Monosodium Titanate Lot # 46000908120 (2014) Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2012- 00659 Rev. 1

  13. Portanova R, Lajunen L, Tolazzi M, Piispanen J (2003) Critical evaluation of stability constants alpha-hydroxycarboxylic acid complexes with protons and metal ions and the accompanying enthalpy changes part II. aliphatic 2-hydroxycarboxylic acids. Int Union Pure Appl Chem 75(4):495–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karraker R (1961) Stability constants of some rare-earth-metal chelates. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo C (1988) Improved application of ion chromatographic determination of carboxylic acids in ozonated drinking water. J Chromatogr A 804:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thermo Scientific (2015) Product Manual for Dionex OnGuard II Cartridges https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/057086

  17. Thermo Scientific (2018) Dionex ICS-6000 Ion Chromatography System Operator’s Manual ICS-6000 Ion Chromatography System Operator’s Manual (fishersci.com)

  18. Sillen L, Martell A (1964) Stability constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. Burlington House, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  19. SeQuant (2007) A Practical Guide to Ion Chromatography. SeQuant AB. Umea, SeQuant AB. Sweden,1–26.SeQuant, Ed

    Google Scholar 

  20. Electronic Code of Federal Refulations - Title 40 - Chap. 1 - Subchapter D - Appendix B to Part 136 - Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit - Revision 2, www.ecfr.gov (accessed 4/2020)

  21. White T, Sigfried M, Riley W, Lambert D, Mahannah R, Harris S(2021) Ion Chromatography (IC) Round Robin Analyses of Low Glycolate Concentration in Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) Post Permanganate Treatment Simulant, Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2021-00476

  22. Duff M, Hunter D, Hobbs D, Fink S, Dai Z, Bradley J (2004) Mechanisms of Strontium and Uranium Removal from High-Level Radioactive Waste Simulant Solutions by Sorbent Monosodium Titanate. Environ Sci Technol 38:5201–5207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oji L, Martin K, Hobbs D (2011) Selective Removal of Strontium and Cesium from Simulated Waste Solution with Titanate Ion-exchangers in a Filter Cartridge Configuration. Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2011-00102.

  24. Chitra S, Shanmugamani A, Sudha R, Kalavathi S, Paul B (2017) Selective removal of cesium and strontium by crystalline silicotitanates. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hobbs D (2011) Properties and Uses of sodium titanates and peroxotitanates. J South Carolina Acad Sci 9(1):20–24

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oji L, Martin K, Hobbs D (2011) Selective Removal of Strontium and Cesium from Simulated Waste Solutions with Titanate Ion-exchangers in a Filter Cartridge Configuration. Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC, SRNL-STI-2011-00102.

  27. Jorge T, Mata A, Antonio C (2016) Mass spectrometry as a quantitative tool in plant metabolomics. Phil Trans R Soc A 374:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Stephanie Craig for ion chromatography analyses and Shirley McCollum for help with NMR samples. Thank you for your contributions to this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. White.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest (COI)

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, T.L., Coleman, C.J., DiPrete, D.D. et al. Analysis of Glycolate in Radioactive Waste by Ion Chromatography (IC) and Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (H NMR). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 4837–4849 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08507-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08507-7

Keywords

Navigation