Abstract
Certified reference material (CRM) standards are used for calibration of mass spectrometer instruments, for measurement control, and for validating analytical methods used by safeguards laboratories. We evaluated the minor isotopic data on plutonium CRMs 136, 137, 138, and 126-A to estimate the contributing factors to the uncertainty budgets of these ratios. Data evaluated were obtained using the total evaporation methodology, which is considered the gold standard for major ratio measurements. For the minor isotope ratios, the per turret correction yielded overall uncertainties that are a factor of 2 to 3 smaller than the correction based on an assumed correction factor using the specified abundance sensitivity. LA-UR-22–22,150.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Romkowski M, Franzini S, Koch L (1987) Mass-spectrometric analysis of sub-nanocurie samples of uranium and plutonium. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual ESARDA symposium, London, 12–14
Richter S, Goldberg SA (2003) Improved techniques for high accuracy isotope ratio measurements of nuclear materials using thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 229:181–197
Mathew KJ, O’Connor G, Hasozbek A, Kraiem MJ (2013) Total evaporation method for uranium isotope-amount ratio measurements. J Anal At Spectrom 28:866–876
Callis EL, Abernathy RM (1991) High-precision isotopic analyses of uranium and plutonium by total sample volatilization and signal integration. Int J Mass Spectrom 103:93–105
Mathew KJ, Ottenfeld CF, Keller RC, Kuhn KJ, Fulwyler JB (2020) Preparation of 241Am/243Am gravimetric mixtures and development of Am isotopic and assay measurement techniques using thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 458:116430
Richter S, Kühn K, Aregbe Y, Hedberg M, Horta-Domenech J, Mayer K, Zuleger E, Bürger S, Boulyga S, Köpf A, Poths J, Mathew K (2011) Improvements in routine uranium isotope ratio measurements using the modified total evaporation method for multi-collector thermal ionization mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 26:550–564
Mathew KJ, Canaan RD, Hexel C, Giaqunito J, Krichinsky AM (2015) Qualification and initial characterization of a high-purity 233U spike for use in uranium analyses. Int J Mass Spectrom 389:47–53
Mathew KJ, Essex RM, Hasozbek A, Orlowicz G, Soriano M (2014) Uranium isotope-amount ratios in certified reference material 116-A – uranium (enriched) metal assay and isotopic standard. Int J Mass Spectrom 369:48–58
Mathew KJ, Mason P, Voeks A, Narayanan U (2012) Uranium isotope abundance ratios in natural uranium metal certified reference material 112-A. Int J Mass Spectrom 315:8–14
Mathew KJ, Singleton GL, Essex RM, Hasozbek A, Orlowicz G, Soriano M (2013) Characterization of the uranium isotopic abundances in depleted uranium metal assay standard. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:435–440
Mialle S, Quémet A, Ponvienne A, Gourgiotis A, Aubert M, Isnard H, Chartier F (2012) The use of total evaporation method using channeltron electron multipliers by thermal ionization mass spectrometry for europium isotope ratio measurements on pictogram sample amounts. Int J Mass Spectrom 309:141–147
Richter S, Alonso A, Aregbe Y, Eykens R, Kehoe F, Kühn H, Kivel N, Verbruggen A, Wellum R, Taylor PDP (2009) A new series of uranium isotope reference materials for investigating linearity of secondary electron multipliers in isotope mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 281:115–125
Mialle S, Richter S, Hennessy C, Truyens J, Jacobsson U, Aregbe Y (2015) Certification of uranium hexafluoride reference materials for isotopic composition. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 305:255–266
Burger S, Essex RM, Mathew KJ, Richter S, Thomas RB (2010) Implementation of guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) to multi-collector TIMS uranium isotope ratio metrology. Int J Mass Spectrom 294:65–76
BIPM JCGM 100 (2008) (GUM 1995 with minor corrections), evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. bureau international des poids et mesures, sevres cedex, France (www.bipm.org)
QUAM (2012) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement – eurachem, 3rd edn, EURACHEM/CITAG Guide CG4
Acknowledgements
Discussions with colleagues S. Floyd (LLNL), L. Tandon (LANL), A. Olson (LANL), S. Richter (IRMM), and P. Mason (NBL-PO) on TIMS isotopic data uncertainties are gratefully acknowledged. Authors have no conflict of interest to declare. All authors have reviewed the paper and approved the content. Authors are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for a very detailed review and comments. Revisions performed as a result of these comments have improved the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mathew, K.J., Ottenfeld, C. & Butterfield, N. An evaluation of the minor isotope ratio uncertainties based on traceable standards from new brunswick laboratory. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 4881–4889 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08505-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08505-9