Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of tailing correction on minor isotopic abundances: Large enough to make the major isotope abundance pass or fail in a proficiency test campaign?

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the major isotope abundance measurements of plutonium, uranium, and americium, the total evaporation technique yields data with best precision and accuracy characteristics. However, minor isotope abundance measurements using this technique are biased higher due to peak tailing effects. We investigate whether the tailing corrections at the minor isotopes are large enough to shift the major isotope abundance values outside the ITV-2010 values, which are routinely used as pass/fail criteria in proficiency test programs. Measured data in a plutonium sample, a uranium sample, and a uranium separate (from decay of Pu isotopes) is investigated. LA-UR-22–22,282.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter S, Alonso A, Truyens J, Kühn H, Verbruggen A, Wellum R (2007) Evaluating the status of uranium isotope ratio measurements using an inter-laboratory comparison campaign. Int J Mass Spectrom 264:184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crozet M, Roudil D, Rigaux C, Bertorello C, Picart S, Maillard C (2019) EQRAIN. Uranium and plutonium interlaboratory exercises from 1997 to 2016: comparison to ITVs-2010. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:1013–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Target Values 2010 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Materials, International Atomic Energy Agency, STR-368.

  4. Bürger S, Essex RM, Mathew KJ, Richter S, Thomas RB (2010) Implementation of guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) to multi-collector TIMS uranium isotope ratio metrology. Int J Mass Spectrom 294:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathew KJ, Thomas MR (2016) Correlation effects in uncertainty calculations involving atom (or weight) percent isotopic abundances. In: Proceedings of the ANS Meeting, Santa Fe, US

  6. Richter S, Kühn K, Aregbe Y, Hedberg M, Horta-Domenech J, Mayer K, Zuleger E, Bürger S, Boulyga S, Köpf A, Poths J, Mathew K (2011) J Anal At Spectrom 26:550–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter S, Goldberg SA (2003) Improved techniques for high accuracy isotope ratio measurements of nuclear materials using thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 229:181–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Callis EL, Abernathy RM (1991) High-precision isotopic analyses of uranium and plutonium by total sample volatilization and signal integration. Int J Mass Spectrom 103:93–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathew KJ, O’Connor G, Hasozbek A, Kraiem MJ (2013) Total evaporation method for uranium isotope-amount ratio measurements. J Anal At Spectrom 28:866–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Romkowski M, Franzini S, Koch L (1987) Mass-Spectrometric Analysis of Sub-nanoCurie Samples of Uranium and Plutonium. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual ESARDA symposium, 12–14 May, London

  11. Mathew KJ, Ottenfeld CF, Keller RC, Kuhn KJ, Fulwyler JB (2020) Preparation of 241Am/243Am gravimetric mixtures and development of Am isotopic and assay measurement techniques using thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 458:116430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Standard Test Method for Determination of Uranium or Plutonium Isotopic Composition or Concentration by the Total Evaporation Method Using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer, ASTM C1672–17

  13. Standard Test Method for Uranium and Plutonium Concentrations and Isotopic Abundances by Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry, ASTM C1625–12

  14. Mathew K, Mason P, Voeks A, Narayanan U (2012) Uranium isotope abundance ratios in natural uranium metal certified reference material 112-A. Int J Mass Spectrom 315:8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter S, Eykens R, Kühn H, Aregbe Y, Verbruggen A, Weyer S (2010) New average values for the n(238U)/n(235U) isotope ratios of natural uranium standards. Int J Mass Spectrom 295:94–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathew KJ, Singleton GL, Essex RM, Hasozbek A, Orlowicz G, Soriano M (2013) Characterization of uranium isotopic abundances in depleted uranium metal assay standard 115. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296(1):435–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathew KJ, Ottenfeld C, Keller R, Slemmons A (2018) Systematic bias in the 240Pu/239Pu isotopic ratio of plutonium isotopic standard CRM138. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318:395–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stanley FE, Mathew KJ, Byerly BL, Keller R, Spencer KJ, Thomas MR (2017) Pursuing standards strategies in nuclear forensics: Investigating extraction of progeny uranium in CRM 126a as a quality control material in Pu-U chronometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311(3):1819–1824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathew K, Kayzar-Boggs T, Varga Z, Gaffney A, Denton J, Fulwyler J et al (2019) Inter-comparison of the radio-chronometric ages of plutonium-certified reference materials with distinct isotopic compositions. Anal Chem 91(18):11643–11652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Discussions with colleagues L. Tandon (LANL) A. Olson (LANL), P. Mason (NBL PO), F. Stanley (LLNL), S. Richter (IRMM), and B. Srinivasan (Office of Science, Chicago) are greatly appreciated. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their thorough and helpful comments. Authors have no conflict of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kattathu J. Mathew.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathew, K.J., Ottenfeld, C., Butterfield, N. et al. Effect of tailing correction on minor isotopic abundances: Large enough to make the major isotope abundance pass or fail in a proficiency test campaign?. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 4873–4879 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08486-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08486-9

Keywords

Navigation